本文選題：開放經(jīng)濟 + 環(huán)保財政支出��； 參考：《中國人口·資源與環(huán)境》2017年10期

【摘要】：首先按照各省環(huán)保財政支出占GDP比重與按主成分分析法計算的地方環(huán)境污染物排放綜合指數(shù)的排名情況把中國30個省份分成兩個區(qū)域,區(qū)域1環(huán)保財政支出污染治理效應(yīng)較強,區(qū)域2環(huán)保財政支出污染治理效應(yīng)較弱。區(qū)域1包括北京、海南等14個省市,區(qū)域2包括天津、上海等16個省市。其次基于2007—2014年中國省級和行業(yè)面板數(shù)據(jù),分析開放經(jīng)濟、環(huán)保財政支出對污染治理的影響。最后借鑒門限回歸模型檢驗開放經(jīng)濟是否存在環(huán)保財政支出與污染治理的門檻效應(yīng)。結(jié)果顯示:(1)環(huán)境污染物排放存在區(qū)域差異和行業(yè)差異,區(qū)域1呈現(xiàn)出開放程度和污染物排放雙低的特征,而區(qū)域2則表現(xiàn)為雙高特征。制造業(yè)、電力、煤氣及水的生產(chǎn)和供應(yīng)業(yè)污染物排放較高,采掘業(yè)污染物排放年均增長速度最快。(2)樣本期內(nèi)省級和行業(yè)面板數(shù)據(jù)均表明開放經(jīng)濟與環(huán)境污染物排放顯著負相關(guān),對外開放不是助推環(huán)境污染的原因。(3)中國環(huán)保財政支出與環(huán)境污染物排放顯著負相關(guān),環(huán)保財政支出具有顯著的污染治理效應(yīng)。(4)開放經(jīng)濟對環(huán)保財政支出的污染治理效應(yīng)具有門檻效應(yīng),當進口和出口貿(mào)易總額高于門檻值-1.221、-1.016時環(huán)保財政支出的污染治理效應(yīng)很難發(fā)揮。(5)以進、出口貿(mào)易總額為門檻變量時,有107個觀測值低于門檻值,占總觀測值的44.58%,其中有59個位于區(qū)域1,占55.14%。鑒于此應(yīng)繼續(xù)加大環(huán)境保護財政支出,進一步提升環(huán)保財政專項支出在GDP中所占比重,保持適度的對外開放,優(yōu)化能源消費結(jié)構(gòu)和實現(xiàn)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級,全面改善環(huán)境質(zhì)量,提升開放經(jīng)濟下環(huán)保財政支出的污染治理效應(yīng)。
[Abstract]:Firstly, 30 provinces in China are divided into two regions according to the proportion of environmental financial expenditure in GDP and the comprehensive index of local environmental pollutant emissions calculated by principal component analysis. Region 2 environmental protection fiscal expenditure pollution control effect is weak. Region 1 includes Beijing, Hainan and other 14 provinces and cities, region 2 including Tianjin, Shanghai and other 16 provinces and cities. Secondly, based on the provincial and industry panel data from 2007 to 2014, the paper analyzes the impact of open economy and environmental expenditure on pollution control. Finally, the threshold regression model is used to test whether there is the threshold effect of environmental financial expenditure and pollution control in open economy. The results showed that there were regional and industry differences in the discharge of environmental pollutants. Region 1 showed the characteristics of both open degree and low emission of pollutants, while region 2 showed double high characteristics. The provincial and industry panel data of manufacturing, electricity, gas and water production and water production and supply industries show that there is a significant negative correlation between open economy and environmental pollutant emissions during the sample period. Opening to the outside world is not the cause of promoting environmental pollution. (3) there is a significant negative correlation between China's environmental financial expenditure and environmental pollutant emissions. Environmental financial expenditure has significant pollution control effect. (4) Open economy has threshold effect on pollution control effect of environmental financial expenditure. When the total import and export trade is above the threshold -1.221 ~ 1.016, the pollution control effect of the environmental financial expenditure is very difficult to bring into play. When the total export trade is the threshold variable, 107 observed values are below the threshold. Of the total observed values, 59 were located in area 1, accounting for 55.14. In view of this, we should continue to increase the financial expenditure on environmental protection, further enhance the proportion of special expenditure on environmental protection in GDP, keep the moderate opening to the outside world, optimize the energy consumption structure and realize the upgrading of industrial structure, and comprehensively improve the environmental quality. Enhance the pollution control effect of environmental financial expenditure under open economy.
【作者單位】： 重慶大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院;重慶師范大學(xué)經(jīng)濟與管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：中國博士后科學(xué)基金面上項目“碳減排與經(jīng)濟增長的最優(yōu)耦合測度及差別化減排方案設(shè)計”(批準號:2012M511898) 重慶市人民政府發(fā)展研究中心項目“聯(lián)動治理農(nóng)村面源污染推進美麗鄉(xiāng)村建設(shè)的對策研究”(批準號:2014-ZB-11)
【分類號】：F812.45;X22

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 吳江;賈蕾;石磊;孫彤;;美國環(huán)境財政的發(fā)展歷程及其對我國的啟示[J];環(huán)境保護;2012年20期

2 關(guān)海玲;張鵬;;財政支出、公共產(chǎn)品供給與環(huán)境污染[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟;2013年10期

3 盧洪友;田丹;;中國財政支出對環(huán)境質(zhì)量影響的實證分析[J];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2014年04期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 朱海倫;鄭琳;謝斌;;地方環(huán)境保護財政支出效能研究——以嘉興市為例[A];中國行政管理學(xué)會2011年年會暨“加強行政管理研究，，推動政府體制改革”研討會論文集[C];2011年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 吳紅萱 武財 許美艷;武進財政支出“環(huán)保優(yōu)先”[N];中國財經(jīng)報;2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 趙瑞雪;河北省財政支出對環(huán)境的影響效應(yīng)分析[D];河北大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：1784801