本文選題：旅游凝視 + 鄉(xiāng)村旅游�。� 參考：《吉首大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：“旅游凝視”是厄里由拉康、�？碌热说睦碚摶A上,在《旅游者的凝視:當代社會的休閑與旅游業(yè)》中提出的。厄里認為“旅游凝視”包括旅游欲求、旅游動機和旅游行為等一系列過程,是一種隱喻和理論抽象,也是旅游者對旅游地的一種作用力,具有生產(chǎn)性。旅游凝視這一過程中,游客、本地居民、政府、策劃者之間進行著權力的博弈、商榷與妥協(xié)。游客和本地居民作為意義生產(chǎn)的實踐主體,政府和策劃人作為意義生產(chǎn)的組織主體,兩方面主體的合力對鄉(xiāng)村空間進行重塑。鄉(xiāng)村在旅游凝視中被重塑,這一過程也是意義被生產(chǎn)的過程。具體到德夯村而言,是以前往德夯旅游的消費者的生理、心理需求為目標產(chǎn)物,以鄉(xiāng)村已有的自然山水、民俗風情和公路奇觀為底板,政府、策劃者作為中介和詮釋力量,將鄉(xiāng)村的文化符碼帶入到不同的表征系統(tǒng)和敘事語法當中,意義由此被建構和生產(chǎn)。德夯原有的自然、文化符碼被轉譯,發(fā)生形變。最后,論文對旅游凝視下鄉(xiāng)村的意義生產(chǎn)中的問題進行分析。也即文化大眾化與文化個性化之間的沖突問題,更細致地是文化接受、變現(xiàn)過程中的“文化折扣”和“文化增值”的問題進行分析。“文化折扣”原本被使用在跨國界的文化傳播和接受中,但民族地域之間文化語境的差異確實同樣會導致文化在傳播和接受中產(chǎn)生損耗。為了更好地闡述觀點,本文在民族地域文化傳播中使用了“文化折扣”的概念。同時,將湘西德夯苗寨的鄉(xiāng)村旅游開發(fā)與日本鄉(xiāng)村旅游發(fā)展較為成熟的三島町案例進行分析比較,試圖提供一些可供參考的啟示。本研究以湖南省湘西州德夯苗寨為例,通過敘事學和符號學的方法,旨在研究“旅游凝視”中的哪些主體使得鄉(xiāng)村的意義發(fā)生變化,變化的具體內(nèi)容是什么,以及這些變化會導致怎樣的問題,最后參考較為成熟的鄉(xiāng)村旅游案例嘗試給出建議。以期對鄉(xiāng)村旅游的開發(fā)、打造和少數(shù)民族本土文化的活態(tài)保護有所助益。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the theory of Uryukan and Foucault, "tourist gaze" was put forward in "tourist gaze: leisure and tourism in contemporary society". Urry believes that "tourist gaze" includes a series of processes, such as tourism desire, tourism motivation and tourism behavior, which is a metaphor and theoretical abstraction, and is also a kind of force and productive force of tourists to the tourist destination. In the process of tourist gaze, there is a game of power, discussion and compromise among tourists, local residents, government and planners. Tourists and local residents are the practical subjects of meaningful production, the government and planners are the organizational subjects of meaningful production, and the joint forces of the two main bodies reshape the rural space. The village is reshaped in the process of tourism gaze, which is also the process of meaning being produced. As far as the village is concerned, it is the target product of the physiological and psychological needs of the consumers who travel to Dezan, the natural landscape, customs and the wonders of the highway that the countryside already has, and the government and planners act as the intermediary and interpretation force. The rural cultural code is introduced into different representation systems and narrative grammar, and the meaning is constructed and produced. The original natural and cultural codes are translated and deformed. Finally, the paper analyzes the problems in the meaning production of tourism staring at the countryside. In other words, the conflict between cultural popularization and cultural individualization is more detailed analysis of cultural acceptance, cultural discount and cultural appreciation in the process of realization. "Cultural discount" was originally used in the cultural communication and acceptance across national boundaries, but the differences of cultural context between ethnic regions can also lead to the loss of culture in the process of transmission and acceptance. In order to better explain the point of view, this paper uses the concept of "cultural discount" in the dissemination of national regional culture. At the same time, the paper analyzes and compares the rural tourism development of Dezam Miao Zhai in Xiangxi with the case of Miyamachi, which is mature in the development of rural tourism in Japan, in order to provide some references for reference. This study takes De-Pan Miao Zhai in Xiangxi Prefecture, Hunan Province as an example, through narratology and semiotics methods, the purpose of this study is to study which subjects in "Tourism gaze" make the meaning of the village change and what is the specific content of the change. And how these changes will lead to problems, finally, reference to more mature cases of rural tourism try to give suggestions. It is helpful to the development of rural tourism and the protection of the native culture of ethnic minorities.
【學位授予單位】：吉首大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F592.7;F327

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 樊友猛;謝彥君;;記憶、展示與凝視:鄉(xiāng)村文化遺產(chǎn)保護與旅游發(fā)展協(xié)同研究[J];旅游科學;2015年01期

2 胡大平;;南京長江大橋[J];學術研究;2012年10期

3 明躍玲;;鄉(xiāng)村旅游與社區(qū)參與的主體意識培養(yǎng)——以湘西德夯苗族村寨為例[J];湖北民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2010年04期

4 左曉斯;李鈺;;現(xiàn)代性、逃避主義與后現(xiàn)代旅游[J];思想戰(zhàn)線;2009年05期

5 徐曉光;;芭茅草與草標——苗族口承習慣法中的文化符號[J];貴州民族研究;2008年03期

6 左曉斯;現(xiàn)代性、后現(xiàn)代性與鄉(xiāng)村旅游[J];廣東社會科學;2005年01期

7 周 憲;作為地方性概念的審美現(xiàn)代性[J];南京大學學報(哲學.人文科學.社會科學版);2002年03期

8 石向實;論發(fā)生認識論的同化和順應概念[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會科學(文史哲版);1996年03期

9 楊昌國;龍·鳥·牛——苗族圖騰崇拜三題[J];貴州社會科學;1992年01期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 劉思敏;霍光;;“飚高三部曲”與城市休閑天際線[N];中國旅游報;2010年

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 朱曉蘭;“凝視”理論研究[D];南京大學;2011年

相關碩士學位論文 前8條

1 李思穎;鄉(xiāng)村旅游中的“凝視”：云南省瀘西縣城子村個案考察[D];云南大學;2015年

2 何娟;游客凝視下鼓浪嶼旅游意象研究[D];福建師范大學;2014年

3 王瑾;平江歷史文化街區(qū)旅游意象研究[D];蘇州大學;2014年

4 張秀娟;“旅游凝視”視角下的民族文化建構研究[D];云南大學;2012年

5 劉潤;旅游凝視需求驅動下的藏區(qū)城鎮(zhèn)社會空間結構演變研究[D];西北師范大學;2012年

6 譚杰倪;旅游者攝影行為研究[D];重慶師范大學;2011年

7 徐琦;消費社會中的旅游凝視行為研究[D];東北財經(jīng)大學;2010年

8 崔紅紅;旅游圖文凝視下的目的地形象研究[D];華東師范大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1922775