發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-16 22:28

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：東莞SC研究院發(fā)展模式和路徑研究　出處：《華南理工大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 地方智庫(kù) 研究院 發(fā)展模式

【摘要】：東莞SC研究院作為一家民間研究機(jī)構(gòu),經(jīng)過幾年時(shí)間發(fā)展,在決策咨詢領(lǐng)域取得一定的成績(jī)。但同時(shí),也存在著許多民間智庫(kù)發(fā)展中所遇到的一些難題和困惑。比如,組織結(jié)構(gòu)、運(yùn)營(yíng)機(jī)制、資金渠道、人才隊(duì)伍等方面都存在許多問題和不足。因此,本文通過實(shí)地調(diào)查法、文獻(xiàn)分析法、案例研究法等研究方法,對(duì)東莞SC研究院進(jìn)行深入調(diào)查,對(duì)其內(nèi)、外部環(huán)境進(jìn)行全面剖析,查找存在問題的原因,為研究院未來可持續(xù)發(fā)展提出合適的對(duì)策和建議。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),隨著中央相關(guān)系列政策的出臺(tái),中國(guó)民間智庫(kù)將會(huì)迎來發(fā)展機(jī)遇。目前,東莞決策咨詢行業(yè)具有很大的發(fā)展空間,政府決策層面也逐步形成一種廣聽民意的社會(huì)氛圍,東莞本土的經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力以及對(duì)思想產(chǎn)品的需求為東莞SC研究院帶來了許多發(fā)展機(jī)會(huì),與此同時(shí),我們也看到東莞目前高端的研究人才十分短缺,研究人員成本也逐步加大,市場(chǎng)對(duì)于思想產(chǎn)品的要求也越來越高,這些威脅也對(duì)研究院帶來了挑戰(zhàn)。在研究院內(nèi)部,研究院擁有自身的獨(dú)特優(yōu)勢(shì)資源,作為省市社會(huì)建設(shè)共建項(xiàng)目,在項(xiàng)目來源、經(jīng)費(fèi)支持、成果報(bào)送等方面具有自身特點(diǎn),但在管理機(jī)制、團(tuán)隊(duì)建設(shè)等方面也存在一些不足和問題。研究認(rèn)為,東莞SC研究院應(yīng)立足于東莞本土市情,堅(jiān)持做小做精的發(fā)展方向,其發(fā)展模式應(yīng)該是服務(wù)東莞社會(huì)建設(shè)的樞紐型智庫(kù)平臺(tái),充分發(fā)揮靈活平臺(tái)作用,廣泛集聚社會(huì)各界力量的核心優(yōu)勢(shì),為東莞社會(huì)建設(shè)服務(wù)。發(fā)展路徑需要以提升內(nèi)部能力和整合外部資源作為重點(diǎn),從建立現(xiàn)代管理體系、打造特色思想產(chǎn)品、整合高素質(zhì)人才力量、拓寬籌資融資渠道、完善成果轉(zhuǎn)化宣傳機(jī)制五個(gè)方面加以推進(jìn),實(shí)現(xiàn)東莞SC研究院可持續(xù)發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:As a private research institution, the Dongguan SC Research Institute has made some achievements in the field of decision-making consulting after several years of development. But at the same time. There are also some problems and puzzles encountered in the development of many folk think tanks. For example, there are many problems and deficiencies in organizational structure, operation mechanism, financial channels, talent team, etc. Through field investigation, literature analysis, case study and other research methods, this paper makes an in-depth investigation on Dongguan SC Research Institute, analyzes its internal and external environment comprehensively, and finds out the reasons for the problems. For the future sustainable development of the Institute to put forward appropriate countermeasures and suggestions. The study found that with the introduction of the central related series of policies, China's non-governmental think tanks will ushered in development opportunities. Dongguan decision-making consulting industry has a great space for development, government decision-making level has gradually formed a broad public opinion of the social atmosphere. Dongguan's local economic strength and the demand for ideological products have brought many development opportunities for the Dongguan SC Research Institute. At the same time, we also see a very shortage of high-end research personnel in Dongguan. The cost of researchers is also gradually increasing, the market for ideological products are also increasingly demanding, these threats also bring challenges to the Institute. Within the Institute, the Institute has its own unique advantages and resources. As a co-construction project of provincial and municipal social construction, it has its own characteristics in terms of project source, funding support, achievement reporting and so on, but there are some shortcomings and problems in management mechanism, team building and so on. Dongguan SC Research Institute should be based on the local market situation in Dongguan, adhere to the development direction of small do fine, its development model should be serving Dongguan social construction hub think tank platform, give full play to the role of flexible platform. The development path needs to focus on enhancing internal capacity and integrating external resources from the establishment of modern management system to create characteristic ideological products. The sustainable development of Dongguan SC Research Institute can be realized by integrating the high quality talents, widening the financing channels and perfecting the propaganda mechanism of the achievement transformation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：G322.23

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 楊平波;張曉琴;;慈善組織公信力財(cái)務(wù)解讀[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2011年20期

2 楊平波;;產(chǎn)權(quán)視角下非公募慈善基金會(huì)信息披露探討[J];財(cái)會(huì)月刊;2010年15期

3 張昌輝;;公司治理機(jī)制在非營(yíng)利組織中的應(yīng)用研究[J];管理觀察;2014年28期

4 臧紅雨;馬文婷;文香;;基于公信力危機(jī)的公益性非營(yíng)利組織治理和績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系研究[J];對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào);2013年08期

5 黃承偉;周晶;程水林;;農(nóng)村貧困治理中民間組織的發(fā)展及制約因素分析——以秦巴山片區(qū)4家草根民間組織的調(diào)查為例[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年10期

6 尚子娟;李衛(wèi)東;閆紹華;;性別失衡公共治理的結(jié)構(gòu)與績(jī)效——一個(gè)分析框架[J];西安交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年06期

7 尚子娟;;中國(guó)性別失衡公共治理的探索與實(shí)踐[J];西安交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年06期

8 劉麗瓏;;我國(guó)非營(yíng)利組織內(nèi)部治理有效嗎——來自基金會(huì)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2015年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 顏克高;非營(yíng)利組織理事會(huì)特征與組織財(cái)務(wù)績(jī)效的關(guān)聯(lián)性研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2012年

2 黃建;民主政治視域下中國(guó)非政府組織發(fā)展研究[D];中共中央黨校;2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1435133