【摘要】：通過跨案例比較與理論整合構(gòu)架了包括搜尋階段、橋化階段、內(nèi)化階段和增值階段在內(nèi)的國家重點實驗室創(chuàng)新資源捕獲過程SBIP模型。結(jié)合110份有效調(diào)查問卷,實證檢驗了SBIP模型及其對國家重點實驗室創(chuàng)新資源捕獲績效產(chǎn)生的影響。研究結(jié)果表明:1)SBIP模型客觀存在,內(nèi)化階段、橋化階段、增值階段、搜尋階段對國家重點實驗室創(chuàng)新資源捕獲績效的貢獻依次遞減;2)國家重點實驗室創(chuàng)新資源捕獲過程資源支撐特征明顯,能力支撐乏力;3)國家重點實驗室創(chuàng)新資源捕獲過程實現(xiàn)途徑呈現(xiàn)"計劃-市場"二元性。另外實證結(jié)果還顯示:目前我國國家重點實驗室正處于快速成長期;與配置、整合創(chuàng)新資源相比,最大化創(chuàng)新資源引入量對發(fā)展我國國家重點實驗室的現(xiàn)實意義更大。
[Abstract]:Through cross-case comparison and theoretical integration, the SBIP model of national key laboratories' innovative resource capture process including search stage, bridge stage, internalization stage and value-added stage is set up. Combined with 110 effective questionnaires, this paper empirically examines the SBIP model and its impact on the performance of the national key laboratories' innovative resource capture. The results show that the SBIP model exists objectively, internalize, bridge, and add value. The contribution of the search stage to the performance of the national key laboratories' innovation resources capture is decreasing in turn. 2) the characteristics of the state key laboratories' innovation resources capture process are obvious. Ability support is weak (3) the process of capturing innovative resources in state key laboratories is characterized by "plan-market" duality. In addition, the empirical results also show that China's national key laboratories are in a rapid growth period, and compared with the allocation and integration of innovation resources, maximizing the amount of innovation resources to the development of China's national key laboratories is of greater practical significance.
【作者單位】： 揚州大學商學院;揚州大學政府治理與公共政策研究中心;華中科技大學公共管理學院;
【分類號】：G322.2
，

本文編號：2176872