本文選題：框架填充墻 + 抗震�。� 參考：《遼寧工業(yè)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：框架填充墻結(jié)構(gòu)具有施工方便、空間布置靈活和室內(nèi)空間大等優(yōu)點(diǎn)，在建筑工程領(lǐng)域是一種廣泛使用的結(jié)構(gòu)形式。雖然框架填充墻有很多優(yōu)點(diǎn)，但是已發(fā)生的地震災(zāi)害現(xiàn)象表明填充墻的破壞依然很?chē)?yán)重，傳統(tǒng)的設(shè)計(jì)方法及施工模式已經(jīng)很難滿足現(xiàn)代建筑的抗震要求，框架填充墻結(jié)構(gòu)在強(qiáng)震中的破壞已造成重大的人員傷亡和財(cái)產(chǎn)損失，引起了各國(guó)相關(guān)研究機(jī)構(gòu)和設(shè)計(jì)人員的高度重視。 雖然我國(guó)設(shè)計(jì)規(guī)范提出砌體填充墻與鋼筋混凝土框架之間，宜脫開(kāi)或采用柔性連接，但并沒(méi)有給出明確的構(gòu)造方法，在施工上具有很大隨意性。為了合理提出框架與填充墻之間的可靠連接方式，必須先研究框架與填充墻之間的相互作用，使得框架主體與填充墻構(gòu)件之間有利的相互作用得到充分發(fā)揮，而不利的相互作用得以避免，最大程度的提高結(jié)構(gòu)整體抗震能力。通過(guò)對(duì)比分析普通純框架體系和框架填充墻結(jié)構(gòu)體系的抗震行為，在已有的研究成果基礎(chǔ)上，本文闡述了在水平地震作用下墻體與框架結(jié)構(gòu)之間的相互影響，，包括填充墻對(duì)框架的有利和不利影響，以及框架對(duì)填充墻的約束效應(yīng)，提高了填充墻的變形能力和抵抗荷載的能力。 根據(jù)填充墻在地震中的破壞情況和框架與填充墻之間的相互作用，為防止結(jié)構(gòu)的破壞，框架與填充墻之間的連接方式最為關(guān)鍵，同時(shí)對(duì)提高框架填充墻整體的抗震性能也有一定的研究?jī)r(jià)值。本文提出了帶阻尼裝置的框架填充墻，利用有限元分析軟件ABAQUS進(jìn)行模擬，通過(guò)對(duì)比分析純框架、普通框架填充墻和帶阻尼裝置的框架填充墻三種不同結(jié)構(gòu)組成在低周反復(fù)荷載作用下的受力性能，得出以下結(jié)論：普通框架填充墻與純框架相比，普通框架填充墻的承載能力較純框架要有所提高，而耗能能力比純框架的要差；帶阻尼裝置的框架填充墻與普通框架填充墻相比，前者的承載能力和耗能能力都有不同程度的提高，說(shuō)明此構(gòu)造措施有助于提高結(jié)構(gòu)的抗震能力，具有一定的應(yīng)用價(jià)值和開(kāi)發(fā)前景。
[Abstract]:The frame infilled wall structure has the advantages of convenient construction, flexible space arrangement and large indoor space. It is a widely used structure form in the field of building engineering. Although the frame infilled wall has many advantages, but the earthquake disaster phenomenon has occurred, the damage of the infilled wall is still very serious, the traditional design method and construction mode have been difficult to meet the seismic requirements of modern buildings. The damage of frame infilled wall structure in strong earthquake has caused heavy casualties and property losses, which has attracted great attention of relevant research institutions and designers in various countries. Although the design code of our country suggests that the masonry infilled wall and reinforced concrete frame should be removed or flexible connection is suitable, but there is no clear construction method, which is very random in construction. In order to reasonably propose a reliable connection between the frame and the infilled wall, we must first study the interaction between the frame and the infilled wall, so that the beneficial interaction between the frame body and the infilled wall member can be brought into full play. Adverse interactions can be avoided and the overall seismic capacity of the structure can be maximized. By comparing and analyzing the seismic behavior of ordinary pure frame system and frame filled wall structure system, based on the existing research results, this paper expounds the interaction between wall and frame structure under horizontal earthquake. The advantages and disadvantages of the infilled wall on the frame and the constraint effect of the frame on the infilled wall can improve the deformation capacity and the ability of resisting load of the infilled wall. According to the failure situation of infilled wall in earthquake and the interaction between frame and infilled wall, in order to prevent the damage of structure, the connection between frame and infilled wall is the most important. At the same time, it has certain research value to improve the seismic performance of frame infilled wall. In this paper, the frame infilled wall with damping device is proposed, and the finite element analysis software ABAQUS is used to simulate it, and the pure frame is compared and analyzed. The mechanical behavior of common frame infilled wall and frame infilled wall with damping device under low cyclic cyclic loading is obtained. The following conclusions are drawn: compared with pure frame, the common frame infilled wall is different from pure frame. The load-carrying capacity of the ordinary frame infilled wall is higher than that of the pure frame, but the energy dissipation capacity is worse than that of the pure frame, and the frame infill wall with damping device is compared with the ordinary frame infill wall. The load-carrying capacity and energy dissipation capacity of the former have been improved to some extent, which indicates that this structural measure is helpful to improve the seismic capacity of the structure, and has certain application value and development prospect.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：TU352.11

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 田志昌,韓建忠,朱梅生;耗能框架填充墻的設(shè)計(jì)和實(shí)驗(yàn)[J];包頭鋼鐵學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1997年04期

2 杜永峰;耿繼芳;;利用簡(jiǎn)易耗能裝置提高填充墻耗能減震能力的數(shù)值模擬[J];工程抗震與加固改造;2011年01期

3 周云;彭水淋;吳從永;尹慶利;郭陽(yáng)照;;新型框架阻尼填充墻的設(shè)計(jì)與分析[J];工程抗震與加固改造;2011年04期

4 章叢俊;李愛(ài)群;趙明;;軟鋼阻尼器耗能減震結(jié)構(gòu)的研究與應(yīng)用綜述[J];工業(yè)建筑;2006年09期

5 蔣利學(xué);鄭喬文;;磚填充墻加固前后鋼筋混凝土框架抗震性能試驗(yàn)[J];工業(yè)建筑;2009年10期

6 譚皓;李杰;張電吉;張澤強(qiáng);章國(guó)成;;玉樹(shù)大地震砌體結(jié)構(gòu)房屋震害特征[J];工程抗震與加固改造;2011年05期

7 郭陽(yáng)照;周云;朱勇;廖奕發(fā);甘英杰;;框架填充墻抗震性能研究的回顧與前瞻[J];工程抗震與加固改造;2012年06期

8 李艷艷;陳艷風(fēng);韓紅霞;劉坤;;帶縫填充墻框架結(jié)構(gòu)抗震性能試驗(yàn)研究[J];工業(yè)建筑;2013年02期

9 周振軼;唐興榮;;多層砌體填充墻框架結(jié)構(gòu)的非線性有限元分析[J];淮海工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2010年02期

10 李哲明,寧文奎,宋玉普,車(chē)軼,夏國(guó)明;非承重抗震墻體實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];建筑結(jié)構(gòu);2004年08期

本文編號(hào)：1842334