本文關鍵詞： 廣府村落 空間形態(tài) 比較研究　出處：《華南理工大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：廣府傳統(tǒng)文化是嶺南地區(qū)分布最廣，影響最大的文化類型，，主要分布在粵中、粵西及桂東南地區(qū),是以粵語為日常用語的廣府人聚居的地區(qū)。廣府文化區(qū)內的村落以梳式布局、三間兩廊民居、以及濃郁的嶺南裝飾為地域特征，是適應南方炎熱多雨氣候而形成的傳統(tǒng)村落。在廣府文化區(qū)內，珠三角地區(qū)是文化核心區(qū)，該區(qū)內的傳統(tǒng)村落特征最明顯。而桂東南地區(qū)的傳統(tǒng)村落處于文化邊緣區(qū)，風格特征、文化識別性相對較弱。 本文以廣府地區(qū)內的傳統(tǒng)村落為研究對象，分別在珠三角及桂東南地區(qū)抽取具有代表性的案例。采用實地調查與理論分析相結合、宏觀與個案研究相結合的研究方法，并借鑒文化地理學、歷史地理學等學科知識，努力發(fā)掘廣府邊緣區(qū)村落與核心區(qū)村落的異同，找出產(chǎn)生這些差異的內在及外在因素，揭示廣府傳統(tǒng)村落的核心特質以及其在應對不同自然環(huán)境時所展現(xiàn)的深刻內涵。 文章先對研究對象、研究范圍、研究方法予以討論和界定，著重于明確廣府文化的范圍，然后梳理國內外傳統(tǒng)村落及廣府傳統(tǒng)村落的研究現(xiàn)狀，尤其仔細閱讀兩廣廣府村落的相關著作，把握現(xiàn)有的研究成果。接著簡述珠三角與桂東南地區(qū)的自然環(huán)境、人文條件等基本內容，總結廣府傳統(tǒng)村落在不同區(qū)域中的分布情況及形態(tài)特征。文章重點在于對這兩個地區(qū)傳統(tǒng)村落的總體格局、形態(tài)特征和建筑特點等進行全面的研究和總結，始終采用比較的分析手法，得出文化核心區(qū)和邊緣區(qū)村落的共同點和不同點。最后，分析存在這些差異的深層原因，指出廣府傳統(tǒng)村落的本質特性，得出全文的結論。 通過本次比較研究，筆者希望達到豐富廣府地區(qū)傳統(tǒng)村落研究的目的，尤其對桂東南地區(qū)廣府村落的研究和記錄作補充，為廣府文化的整體保護做貢獻。
[Abstract]:Guangfu traditional culture is the most widely distributed and most influential cultural type in Lingnan region. It is mainly distributed in central Guangdong, western Guangdong and southeast Guangxi. It is an area where Cantonese is used as a daily language, and the villages in Guangfu cultural area are arranged in comb style. The three two-corridor houses, as well as the rich Lingnan decoration, are the traditional villages formed by adapting to the hot and rainy climate in the south. The Pearl River Delta region is the cultural core area in the Guangfu Cultural region. The characteristics of traditional villages in this area are the most obvious, while the traditional villages in southeast Guangxi are located in the marginal areas of culture, with relatively weak style features and cultural recognitions. This paper takes the traditional villages in the Guangfu area as the research object, and extracts the representative cases in the Pearl River Delta and Southeast Guangxi, respectively. The research method combines the field investigation with the theoretical analysis, the macroscopic and the case study. With reference to the knowledge of cultural geography, historical geography, and so on, this paper tries to find out the similarities and differences between the villages in the margin area of Guangfu and the villages in the core area, and find out the internal and external factors that produce these differences. It reveals the core characteristics of Guangfu traditional village and its profound connotation in dealing with different natural environment. The article first discusses and defines the research object, scope and method, focusing on clarifying the scope of Guangfu culture, and then combing the current research situation of the traditional villages at home and abroad, as well as the traditional villages at home and abroad. In particular, he carefully read the relevant works of the villages of the two countries, and grasped the existing research results. Then he briefly described the natural environment and human conditions of the Pearl River Delta and the southeast of Guangxi, and so on. This paper summarizes the distribution and morphological characteristics of the traditional villages in different areas of Guangfu, and focuses on the overall pattern, morphological characteristics and architectural characteristics of the traditional villages in these two areas. The common points and differences of the villages in the cultural core area and the marginal area are obtained by comparative analysis all the time. Finally, the deep reasons for these differences are analyzed, the essential characteristics of the traditional village in Guangfu are pointed out, and the conclusion of the full text is drawn. Through this comparative study, the author hopes to enrich the study of traditional villages in Guangfu area, especially to supplement the research and records of Guangfu villages in the southeast of Guangxi, so as to contribute to the overall protection of Guangfu culture.
【學位授予單位】：華南理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：TU982.29

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 申秀英;劉沛林;鄧運員;王良健;;中國南方傳統(tǒng)聚落景觀區(qū)劃及其利用價值[J];地理研究;2006年03期

2 楊煥典 ,梁振仕 ,李譜英 ,劉村漢;廣西的漢語方言(稿)[J];方言;1985年03期

3 邱麗;張海;;廣府民系聚落與居住建筑的防御性分析[J];華中建筑;2007年11期

4 羅瑜斌;肖大威;;珠江三角洲歷史文化村鎮(zhèn)的類型及特征研究[J];華中建筑;2009年08期

5 潘瑩;施瑛;;湘贛民系、廣府民系傳統(tǒng)聚落形態(tài)比較研究[J];南方建筑;2008年05期

6 陸琦;潘瑩;;珠江三角洲水鄉(xiāng)聚落形態(tài)[J];南方建筑;2009年06期

7 孫楊栩;唐孝祥;;嶺南廣府地區(qū)傳統(tǒng)聚落中的生態(tài)智慧探析[J];華中建筑;2012年10期

8 黃雪暉;;嶺南走廊文化線路遺產(chǎn)保護初探[J];韶關學院學報;2011年07期

9 吳必虎;中國文化區(qū)的形成與劃分[J];學術月刊;1996年03期

相關博士學位論文 前3條

1 賴瑛;珠江三角洲廣府民系祠堂建筑研究[D];華南理工大學;2010年

2 劉沛林;中國傳統(tǒng)聚落景觀基因圖譜的構建與應用研究[D];北京大學;2011年

3 熊偉;廣西傳統(tǒng)鄉(xiāng)土建筑文化研究[D];華南理工大學;2012年

本文編號：1504362