【摘要】：博客和個人空間是web2.0中十分重要的應(yīng)用。它充分發(fā)揮了網(wǎng)絡(luò)用戶知識創(chuàng)造和信息發(fā)布的能力,更滿足了廣大用戶對自由表達的追求。因此博客空間在世界范圍內(nèi)迅速發(fā)展壯大。網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息中心(CNNIC)發(fā)布的第29次《中國互聯(lián)網(wǎng)絡(luò)發(fā)展狀況統(tǒng)計報告》顯示,截至2012年6月底,我國博客和個人空間用戶數(shù)量為3.53億。在博客作品中,作者可以發(fā)布自己生活瑣事的相關(guān)記錄,也可以發(fā)表個人看法和見解,甚至是自己的創(chuàng)作成果和時事新聞。博客作品中充滿了智慧和思想的結(jié)晶,是新形勢的知識的載體,也是迅速傳播知識和思想的途徑。博客的產(chǎn)生不僅快速改變了人們對個人網(wǎng)站的認識,更是促進了思想火花的迸發(fā)和知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護。 我國公眾對著作權(quán)保護意識普遍不高,然而卻有著根深蒂固的盜版思想。這給博客著作權(quán)保護帶來了重大影響和問題。博客作品的載體和表現(xiàn)形式與傳統(tǒng)作品存在著明顯差異。博客著作權(quán)是一種新型的著作權(quán),有著不同于傳統(tǒng)著作權(quán)的特殊性。傳統(tǒng)的著作權(quán)法律法規(guī)以及我國現(xiàn)行的法律法規(guī)對博客的保護存在一定的不足之處。本文主要是從對比國內(nèi)外法律的角度,思考如何有效地保護我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)博客的著作權(quán)。以期通過借鑒國外有益的立法和司法實踐,為我國博客著作權(quán)法律保護體系的完善進行有益的思考。 本文總體上分為以下三個部分： 第一部分是對博客及博客著作權(quán)的概述,本部分首先對博客、博客著作權(quán)、博客服務(wù)商等相關(guān)概念進行界定,進而指出實務(wù)中侵犯博客著作權(quán)的表現(xiàn)形式及博客著作權(quán)保護所面臨的問題。 第二部分從國內(nèi)外法律對博客著作權(quán)的規(guī)定入手,首先對我國博客著作權(quán)保護的相關(guān)法律規(guī)定進行論述,并淺析《信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護條例》中存在的部分規(guī)定模糊、缺乏賠償計算方式等問題。接著對域外法律有關(guān)博客著作權(quán)的保護進行介紹。這里主要介紹了英國,美國以及法國和日本的相關(guān)規(guī)定。最后針對域外有益的法律實踐進行分析,尤其是美國數(shù)字千年法案和法國三振法案,指出值得我國借鑒之處。 第三部分為完善我國博客著作權(quán)保護的建議。該部分首先指出,對于博客著作權(quán)的保護應(yīng)當以法律為后盾,多角度、多途徑地進行保護。希望在立法中通過借鑒數(shù)字千年法案中的合理使用規(guī)則完善技術(shù)措施保護的規(guī)定。其次應(yīng)該在立法中明確默示授權(quán)的規(guī)定。以及在司法和執(zhí)行中提出相應(yīng)建議,完善賠償計算方法和司法執(zhí)行方式。接著提出提高公民保護著作權(quán)的意識和推廣創(chuàng)作共用協(xié)議的建議,以期完善相關(guān)配套措施。最后文章作出引申,認為對博客空間中的RSS問題和博客作品的著作權(quán)保護時間問題仍存在著繼續(xù)研究的價值。 文章的結(jié)語部分提出現(xiàn)階段對于博客作品的保護應(yīng)當需要依靠法律制度的完善,更要依賴一套完整的保護體系。
[Abstract]:Blog and personal space are very important applications in web2.0. It gives full play to the ability of network users to create knowledge and publish information, and satisfies the users' pursuit of free expression. Therefore, the blog space in the world has grown rapidly. The 29th China Internet Development Statistics report released by the Network Information Center (CNNIC) shows that by the end of June 2012, the number of blog and personal space users in China was 353 million. In a blog work, an author can release a record of his life's trivia, as well as his own opinions and opinions, even his own creative achievements and current affairs news. Blog works are full of wisdom and thought crystallization, is the carrier of knowledge in the new situation, but also the way to spread knowledge and ideas. The emergence of blog not only changes people's understanding of personal website, but also promotes the spark of thought and the protection of intellectual property. China's public awareness of copyright protection is generally low, but there are deep-rooted piracy ideas. This brings great influence and problem to the copyright protection of blog. There are obvious differences between the carrier and expression form of blog works and traditional works. Blog copyright is a new type of copyright, which is different from traditional copyright. The traditional copyright laws and regulations as well as the current laws and regulations of our country have some deficiencies in the protection of blogs. From the angle of comparing domestic and foreign laws, this paper thinks about how to effectively protect the copyright of internet blog in our country. In order to learn from foreign beneficial legislation and judicial practice, for the perfection of the legal protection system of blog copyright in China. This paper is divided into the following three parts: the first part is an overview of blog and blog copyright, this part first defines the relevant concepts of blog, blog copyright, blog service provider, etc. Then it points out the manifestation of the infringement of blog copyright in practice and the problems faced by the protection of blog copyright. The second part starts with the domestic and international laws on blog copyright, first of all, discusses the relevant legal provisions of the protection of blog copyright in China, and analyzes the ambiguity of some provisions in the "regulations on the Protection of Information Network Transmission right". Lack of compensation calculation methods and so on. Then it introduces the protection of the copyright of blog. Here mainly introduces the British, the United States, as well as France and Japan related regulations. Finally, the author analyzes the beneficial legal practice abroad, especially the Digital Millennium Act of the United States and the three strikes Act of France, and points out the points that our country can use for reference. The third part is the suggestion of perfecting the copyright protection of blog in our country. Firstly, this part points out that the protection of blog copyright should be supported by law, from many angles and ways. The author hopes to perfect the protection of technical measures by using for reference the rules of reasonable use in the Digital Millennium Act. Secondly, it is necessary to make clear the provisions of implied authorization in the legislation. And put forward the corresponding suggestion in the judicature and execution, consummate the compensation calculation method and the judicial execution way. Then the author puts forward some suggestions to improve the awareness of copyright protection and to promote creative sharing agreement in order to improve the relevant supporting measures. In the end, the author concludes that there is still value in the study of the RSS problem in blog space and the time of copyright protection in blog works. The conclusion of the article points out that the protection of blog works at this stage should depend on the perfection of legal system and a complete system of protection.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊和義;;日本著作權(quán)法律的新變化及其特征[J];海峽法學(xué);2010年01期

2 王潘;;淺談博客著作權(quán)法律保護[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬);2012年02期

3 陳石;林鴻;;淺析博客版權(quán)的侵權(quán)問題[J];法制與社會;2007年03期

4 陳治宇;袁剛;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)服務(wù)提供商著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任立法之探討——從百度案與雅虎案分析《信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護條例》的不足[J];法制與社會;2008年26期

5 羅德蓮;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)博客的著作權(quán)問題探討[J];法制與社會;2009年05期

6 趙鳳娟;何偉;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)博客著作權(quán)問題探析[J];法制與社會;2009年22期

7 王素玲;南振興;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)博客著作權(quán)侵權(quán)認定及其責(zé)任承擔(dān)[J];湖北經(jīng)濟學(xué)院學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2009年11期

8 趙冉;;談博客著作權(quán)的侵權(quán)行為及解決途徑[J];科技情報開發(fā)與經(jīng)濟;2009年04期

9 萬曉玲;;論博客侵權(quán)行為[J];理論界;2006年12期

10 嚴國定;;淺議網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品著作權(quán)保護[J];科技創(chuàng)業(yè)月刊;2011年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 梁燕;超鏈接的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)問題探析[D];四川大學(xué);2004年

2 金成哲;論著作權(quán)侵權(quán)損害賠償[D];延邊大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：2218183