本文選題：環(huán)境行政權(quán) + 環(huán)境執(zhí)法�。� 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在法律一部又一部出臺的情況下,為何我國的環(huán)境問題非但沒有得到抑制,反而卻越演越烈呢?面對立法日趨完善的今天,我們深刻的意識到,是在治理環(huán)境時,執(zhí)法出現(xiàn)了問題。改善環(huán)境行政執(zhí)法,除了依靠執(zhí)法者提高自身素質(zhì)進(jìn)而加強對自我的約束之外,更重要的是建立有效的外在制約機制,從外部建立行為模式框架以此來要求執(zhí)法者依法執(zhí)政,即建立環(huán)境行政執(zhí)法監(jiān)督機制。 機制的建立,一靠制度,二靠體制,制度就是環(huán)境行政監(jiān)督權(quán)的設(shè)置,體制是環(huán)境行政監(jiān)督權(quán)的運行。本文圍繞“制度——體制——機制”的研究思路,展開全文的論述。同時又將研究重點放在體制的研究,分別從不同的權(quán)力主體：國家權(quán)力機關(guān)、行政機關(guān)、司法機關(guān)、公民與社會團體等角度提出相應(yīng)的問題以及解決的途徑。 文章的脈絡(luò)大致如下： 首先發(fā)現(xiàn)在環(huán)境行政執(zhí)法中的問題,從制度的建設(shè)到體制的運行,都是存在各種各樣的問題的,例如立法規(guī)定之間缺乏協(xié)調(diào)和配合、并且內(nèi)容過于簡單,中央與地方環(huán)保部門權(quán)力配置的隨意性,不同的執(zhí)法機構(gòu)設(shè)置重復(fù),機構(gòu)間協(xié)調(diào)機制欠缺等,透過這些問題的表面現(xiàn)象再尋找深層次的原因。 其次發(fā)現(xiàn)環(huán)境行政執(zhí)法監(jiān)督中的問題,監(jiān)督權(quán)在制度規(guī)定上的便存在著操作性差的問題；在執(zhí)行中,也存在著,環(huán)境行政執(zhí)法監(jiān)督隨意性大,缺乏環(huán)境行政監(jiān)督主體,環(huán)境執(zhí)法監(jiān)督體制分布上的不合理,缺乏責(zé)任制度規(guī)定的同時制裁力也不足。 最后筆者將制度與體制相結(jié)合,提出了不同的意見,即從修改完善現(xiàn)有法律、法規(guī)、規(guī)章,國務(wù)院下發(fā)規(guī)范性文件,環(huán)境行政公益訴訟制度的構(gòu)建,權(quán)力機關(guān)與行政機關(guān)內(nèi)部的監(jiān)督與問責(zé),新聞媒體與公眾的監(jiān)督等方面展開論述。
[Abstract]:With the introduction of one law after another, why is it that the environmental problems in our country have not been restrained, but have become more and more serious? In the face of the increasingly perfect legislation today, we are deeply aware that it is in the governance of the environment, law enforcement problems. In order to improve environmental administrative law enforcement, in addition to relying on law enforcers to improve their own quality and strengthen their self-restraint, it is more important to establish an effective external restraint mechanism and to establish a framework of behavior patterns from the outside to require law enforcers to govern according to law. That is, the establishment of environmental administrative law enforcement supervision mechanism. The establishment of the mechanism depends on the system, which is the establishment of the environmental administrative supervision power and the operation of the environmental administrative supervision power. This paper focuses on the research ideas of system-Mechanism. At the same time, it focuses on the study of the system, and puts forward the corresponding problems and solutions from the different power subjects: the state power organ, the administrative organ, the judicial organ, the citizen and the social organization and so on. The context of the article is as follows: First of all, it is found that there are various problems in environmental administrative law enforcement, from the construction of the system to the operation of the system. For example, there is a lack of coordination and cooperation between the legislative provisions, and the content is too simple. The arbitrary allocation of power between central and local environmental protection departments, the duplication of different law enforcement agencies, the lack of coordination mechanism between agencies, and so on, seek the deep-seated causes through the superficial phenomena of these problems. Secondly, the problems in the supervision of environmental administrative law enforcement are found, and there is a problem of poor operation in the regulation of supervision power. In the implementation, there are also problems in the supervision of environmental administrative law enforcement, which is arbitrary and lacks the subject of environmental administrative supervision. The distribution of environmental law enforcement supervision system is unreasonable, and the punishment power is also insufficient when the responsibility system is lacking. Finally, the author combines the system with the system, puts forward different opinions, that is, from the modification and improvement of existing laws, regulations, the State Council issued normative documents, the construction of environmental administrative public interest litigation system, The internal supervision and accountability of power organs and administrative organs, the supervision of the news media and the public are discussed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 尚福泉;陳洪梅;;淺談環(huán)境執(zhí)法在具體執(zhí)法實踐中存在的現(xiàn)實問題和提高環(huán)保執(zhí)法能力的對策[J];環(huán)境科學(xué)與管理;2009年05期

2 黃錫生;王江;;中國環(huán)境執(zhí)法的障礙與破解[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年01期

3 肖莆;陳紅楓;;我國環(huán)境執(zhí)法體系問題初探[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(下半月);2008年09期

4 馬品懿;;論環(huán)境執(zhí)法監(jiān)督體系的完善[J];黨史博采.理論;2006年09期

5 李克榮;;環(huán)境法執(zhí)法機制研究[J];河北科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年03期

6 杜萬平;;環(huán)境行政權(quán)的監(jiān)督機制研究——對環(huán)境法律實施狀況的一種解釋[J];環(huán)境資源法論叢;2006年00期

7 劉書俊;;淺論環(huán)境執(zhí)法的規(guī)范化[J];環(huán)境保護(hù);2008年10期

8 馮錦彩;;論中國環(huán)境執(zhí)法制度的完善——以中美環(huán)境執(zhí)法制度比較為視角[J];環(huán)境保護(hù);2009年06期

9 曹璐璐;姚s，

本文編號：1885992