本文選題：不可移動文物 + 影響評價　； 參考：《學術(shù)交流》2017年02期

【摘要】：城市發(fā)展與城市賴以產(chǎn)生與存在的歷史文化密不可分,對城市文物環(huán)境的破壞會割裂城市與其歷史文化之間的聯(lián)系,最終阻礙城市的發(fā)展�，F(xiàn)有的文物保護法律體系存在保護對象未盡周嚴,行政監(jiān)督乏力的缺陷。不可移動文物是城市文物環(huán)境的組成部分,環(huán)境保護是文物保護的重要環(huán)節(jié)。從解釋論的視角出發(fā),合乎環(huán)境法基本原理的"環(huán)境"概念應(yīng)包括文物環(huán)境,環(huán)境影響評價的法律規(guī)則亦應(yīng)適用于不可移動文物保護。從立法論的角度出發(fā),需要從模式選擇和程序規(guī)則兩個方面實現(xiàn)文物影響評價制度的法治化。在模式選擇上,相較于獨立的文物影響評價機制,文物與環(huán)境的綜合影響評價是更適合我國的做法。在評價程序上,綜合影響評價的主體和評價對象兩項規(guī)則上應(yīng)具有不同于單純環(huán)境影響評價的特色。
[Abstract]:Urban development is inseparable from the historical culture on which the city is born and exists. The destruction of the city's cultural relic environment will separate the connection between the city and its historical culture, and ultimately hinder the development of the city. The existing legal system of cultural relic protection has defects of incomplete protection objects and weak administrative supervision. Immovable cultural relic is an integral part of urban cultural relic environment, and environmental protection is an important link of cultural relic protection. From the angle of explanation, the concept of "environment" according to the basic principle of environmental law should include the environment of cultural relics, and the legal rules of environmental impact assessment should also be applied to the protection of immovable cultural relics. From the point of view of legislation, it is necessary to realize the legalization of cultural relic impact assessment system from two aspects: mode selection and procedural rules. Compared with the independent cultural relic impact assessment mechanism, the comprehensive impact assessment of cultural relic and environment is more suitable for our country. In the evaluation procedure, the main body and the object of comprehensive impact assessment should have different characteristics from that of pure environmental impact assessment.
【作者單位】： 中央財經(jīng)大學;北京師范大學珠海分校;
【基金】：中國法學會省部級課題“非國有不可移動文物上的土地發(fā)展權(quán)實現(xiàn)方式研究”(CLS(2016)C10)
【分類號】：D922.16

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 桑杰;;我國宗教立法論要[J];攀登;2007年01期

2 桑杰;;我國宗教立法論要[J];世界宗教研究;2006年01期

3 馮彥君;李娜;;勞務(wù)派遣的法治化探尋——解釋論與立法論的雙重考量[J];學習與探索;2013年08期

4 陳海嵩;;“生態(tài)紅線”的規(guī)范效力與法治化路徑——解釋論與立法論的雙重展開[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2014年04期

5 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 梁景辰 褚文學 程計山;“泛立法論”不利于打造責任政府[N];檢察日報;2005年

，

本文編號：1884763