本文選題：競(jìng)業(yè)禁止 + 勞動(dòng)權(quán)��； 參考：《廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)條件下,競(jìng)業(yè)禁止與勞動(dòng)權(quán)的沖突時(shí)有發(fā)生,競(jìng)業(yè)禁止是保護(hù)商業(yè)秘密權(quán)和社會(huì)公共利益的法律手段,又是導(dǎo)致勞動(dòng)權(quán)與上述兩個(gè)法益沖突的重要原因。本文通過(guò)比較研究,肯定了競(jìng)業(yè)禁止制度的意義和存在價(jià)值,通過(guò)對(duì)競(jìng)業(yè)禁止涉及的矛盾和沖突的成因及實(shí)務(wù)問(wèn)題分析,首先確立了平衡沖突的三個(gè)原則:社會(huì)利益最大化原則、傾斜保護(hù)原則、合理限制原則,并結(jié)合了域外的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出了一系列的完善建議。針對(duì)我國(guó)競(jìng)業(yè)禁止法律規(guī)范凌亂,原則性強(qiáng),缺乏靈活性和可操作性的問(wèn)題,提出統(tǒng)一競(jìng)業(yè)禁止相關(guān)立法,細(xì)化競(jìng)業(yè)禁止相關(guān)規(guī)定,增強(qiáng)指導(dǎo)性,對(duì)競(jìng)業(yè)禁止的范圍、主體、法律救濟(jì)、經(jīng)濟(jì)補(bǔ)償金等進(jìn)行規(guī)范,以增強(qiáng)司法實(shí)務(wù)中的可操作性。針對(duì)法律對(duì)競(jìng)業(yè)禁止協(xié)議的形式和有效要件缺乏規(guī)制的情況,提出競(jìng)業(yè)禁止協(xié)議應(yīng)當(dāng)以采取書(shū)面形式和必須包含經(jīng)濟(jì)補(bǔ)償條款為必要生效要件。針對(duì)我國(guó)立法對(duì)競(jìng)業(yè)禁止的法律定位不清導(dǎo)致救濟(jì)方式混亂以及立法混亂的問(wèn)題,提出要明確立法目的,明確競(jìng)業(yè)禁止協(xié)議的性質(zhì),提高行政救濟(jì)效力,發(fā)揮社會(huì)團(tuán)體力量等。針對(duì)勞動(dòng)者因受到競(jìng)業(yè)禁止協(xié)議的限制而得不到合理補(bǔ)償?shù)膯?wèn)題,提出要細(xì)化經(jīng)濟(jì)補(bǔ)償?shù)南嚓P(guān)規(guī)定,如如何計(jì)算經(jīng)濟(jì)補(bǔ)償金額等。
[Abstract]:Under the condition of market economy, the conflict between the prohibition of competition and the right of labor occurs from time to time. The prohibition of competition is the legal means to protect the right to trade secret and the public interest of society, and it is also an important reason leading to the conflict between the right of labor and the two legal interests mentioned above. Through comparative study, this paper affirms the significance and existence value of the non-compete system, and analyzes the causes and practical problems of the contradictions and conflicts involved in the prohibition of competition. Firstly, three principles of balancing conflict are established: the principle of maximization of social benefits, the principle of tilt protection, the principle of reasonable restriction, and a series of perfect suggestions are put forward in combination with the legislative experience of foreign countries. In view of the problems of disorderly, strong principle, lack of flexibility and maneuverability of the legal norms of the prohibition of non-competition in China, this paper puts forward a unified legislation on the prohibition of non-competition, the refinement of the relevant provisions of the prohibition of non-competition, the enhancement of guidance, the scope and the subject of the prohibition of non-competition. Legal relief, economic compensation and other norms to enhance the operation of judicial practice. In view of the lack of legal regulation on the form and effective elements of non-compete agreement, this paper puts forward that the non-competition agreement should take written form and must contain economic compensation clause as the necessary effective elements. In view of the confusion of the legal position of the legislation on the prohibition of non-competition in our country and the confusion of the legislation, it is proposed that the purpose of legislation should be clarified, the nature of the non-compete agreement should be clarified, the effectiveness of administrative relief should be improved, and the strength of social organizations should be brought into full play. In view of the problem that the laborer can not get reasonable compensation because of the restriction of non-competition agreement, this paper puts forward some relevant regulations to refine the economic compensation, such as how to calculate the amount of economic compensation, etc.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 喬安麗;李坤剛;;論約定競(jìng)業(yè)限制的合理范圍[J];中國(guó)勞動(dòng);2015年18期

2 胡良榮;易小輝;;沖突與協(xié)調(diào):人力資源的有序流動(dòng)與商業(yè)秘密的充分保護(hù)——以強(qiáng)化勞動(dòng)權(quán)保障和優(yōu)化競(jìng)業(yè)禁止制度為視角[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年07期

3 廖秀健;高楚南;;商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)中競(jìng)業(yè)禁止制度的完善初探[J];學(xué)理論;2013年22期

4 王林清;;公司法與勞動(dòng)法語(yǔ)境下競(jìng)業(yè)禁止之比較[J];政法論壇;2013年01期

5 朱軍;;離職競(jìng)業(yè)禁止之經(jīng)濟(jì)補(bǔ)償?shù)暮侠泶_定——以德國(guó)法為視角[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2011年04期

6 徐陽(yáng);劉新智;;競(jìng)業(yè)禁止中的權(quán)利沖突與衡平[J];西南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

7 馮果;;“禁止篡奪公司機(jī)會(huì)”規(guī)則探究[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2010年01期

8 劉小勇;;論營(yíng)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)讓人的競(jìng)業(yè)禁止義務(wù)——以日本法為中心展開(kāi)[J];太平洋學(xué)報(bào);2009年10期

9 郭毅;;競(jìng)業(yè)禁止制度的法益衡量——商業(yè)秘密權(quán)與勞動(dòng)權(quán)的沖突和協(xié)調(diào)[J];高等函授學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年08期

10 王鍇;;論我國(guó)憲法上的勞動(dòng)權(quán)與勞動(dòng)義務(wù)[J];法學(xué)家;2008年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 翟業(yè)虎;競(jìng)業(yè)禁止法律問(wèn)題研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2013年

2 徐陽(yáng);勞動(dòng)權(quán)保障視域下的競(jìng)業(yè)禁止法律制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 尹姝然;商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)中的競(jìng)業(yè)禁止制度研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2014年

2 陳曉蕓;論商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)中的競(jìng)業(yè)禁止制度[D];上海交通大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1886196