【摘要】：在"互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+"時(shí)代,網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)服務(wù)提供者扮演著提供交換資源、承擔(dān)組織調(diào)度的角色,已成為身處網(wǎng)絡(luò)活動(dòng)第一線的管理者。在法定義務(wù)以及與網(wǎng)民協(xié)定契約的共同塑造之下,網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)服務(wù)提供者擁有了網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)管中的"軟權(quán)力",進(jìn)而引申出"以網(wǎng)管網(wǎng)"的命題。為了確保網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)服務(wù)提供者積極履行"以網(wǎng)管網(wǎng)"職責(zé),《刑法修正案(九)》引入拒不履行信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全管理義務(wù)罪,該罪采取了概括式罪名模式,條文輻射的范圍過(guò)寬,難以為司法機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)其進(jìn)行刑事追責(zé)提供確定性約束。鑒于此,裁判者應(yīng)秉持"兼顧互聯(lián)網(wǎng)行業(yè)發(fā)展與網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪治理"的基本立場(chǎng),嚴(yán)格拿捏"不履行法定義務(wù)的規(guī)范依據(jù)與實(shí)質(zhì)內(nèi)容、責(zé)令改正意見(jiàn)的明確性以及義務(wù)違反與危害后果間的因果關(guān)系"等限制要點(diǎn),確定該罪名在司法適用中的法治邊界,并嘗試通過(guò)科學(xué)的釋法來(lái)獲取該罪名在司法實(shí)踐中正當(dāng)?shù)倪m用范式。
[Abstract]:In the "Internet" era, network platform service providers play the role of providing exchange resources and assuming the role of organization scheduling, and have become the front-line managers of network activities. Under the legal obligation and the contract with netizens, the network platform service provider has the "soft power" in the network supervision, and then extends the proposition of "network pipe network". In order to ensure that the network platform service providers actively perform the duty of "network", the Criminal Law Amendment (9) introduces the crime of refusing to perform the obligation of information network security management. The crime adopts a general pattern of charges, and the scope of the provisions radiation is too wide. It is difficult for the judicial organs to provide certain constraints on criminal accountability. In view of this, judges should adhere to the basic position of "taking into account the development of the Internet industry and the governance of cybercrime", and strictly grasp the normative basis and substance of "failure to perform legal obligations." Ordering the clarity of the correction opinion and the causal link between the breach of obligations and the consequences of harm "and determining the boundaries of the rule of law in the application of justice for the offence, And try to get the proper application paradigm of the crime in judicial practice through the scientific interpretation of the law.
【作者單位】： 大連理工大學(xué)法律系;
【基金】：作者主持的遼寧省社科規(guī)劃基金青年項(xiàng)目“網(wǎng)絡(luò)黑社會(huì)犯罪刑法治理”(L15 CFX007)階段性研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3
，

本文編號(hào)：2446602