【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)的發(fā)展導(dǎo)致利用網(wǎng)絡(luò)的犯罪日益增多,單個(gè)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪所造成的危害其實(shí)并不大,但是近年來(lái)利用互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺(tái)效應(yīng)進(jìn)行犯罪的現(xiàn)象越來(lái)越嚴(yán)重,網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪逐漸發(fā)生異化,以至于網(wǎng)絡(luò)幫助犯的作用越來(lái)越大,甚至?xí)h(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超過(guò)實(shí)行犯的作用。為了對(duì)此類(lèi)行為予以嚴(yán)格的規(guī)制,刑法修正案九新增幫助信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪活動(dòng)罪。對(duì)于該罪的出臺(tái),筆者認(rèn)為,這是幫助行為正犯化的體現(xiàn),但是不能對(duì)類(lèi)似行為一律入罪,應(yīng)該對(duì)其進(jìn)行一定的限制解釋,否則會(huì)導(dǎo)致在實(shí)踐中擴(kuò)大處罰范圍的結(jié)果。基于此,本文擬進(jìn)行相關(guān)研究。首先,筆者從網(wǎng)絡(luò)中立技術(shù)幫助行為的上位概念——中立幫助行為入手,以快播案所帶來(lái)的法律界爭(zhēng)議引出中立幫助行為,對(duì)其能否進(jìn)行處罰進(jìn)行分析,得出限制處罰的觀點(diǎn)。即首先強(qiáng)調(diào)客觀方面的作用,同時(shí)適當(dāng)考慮主觀方面的因素對(duì)其處罰范圍進(jìn)行限制;進(jìn)而將其引申到網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)中立幫助行為上,基于網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)中立幫助行為的特殊性,對(duì)其處罰進(jìn)行相關(guān)限制。最后,根據(jù)刑法修正案九對(duì)幫助信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪的規(guī)定,對(duì)其基本性質(zhì)進(jìn)行界定,最終對(duì)該罪在實(shí)踐中的應(yīng)用需要進(jìn)行哪些方面的限制進(jìn)行分析。主要從主客觀兩個(gè)方面對(duì)該行為的處罰進(jìn)行相關(guān)限制解釋,以期防止對(duì)其處罰范圍的過(guò)于擴(kuò)大,從而保證對(duì)該行為的刑法規(guī)制達(dá)到罪責(zé)刑相適應(yīng)的程度。
[Abstract]:The development of the network leads to the increasing number of crimes using the network, and the harm caused by the single network crime is not great, but in recent years, the phenomenon of using the Internet platform effect to commit crimes is becoming more and more serious, and the network crime is gradually dissimilated. So much so that the role of the network to help offenders, or even far more than the role of crime. In order to strictly regulate this kind of behavior, the ninth amendment of the Criminal Law adds the crime of helping information network criminal activities. For the introduction of this crime, the author believes that it is the embodiment of helping behavior to commit the crime, but the similar behavior can not all be incriminated, should be interpreted to some extent, otherwise it will lead to the result of expanding the scope of punishment in practice. Based on this, this paper intends to carry out relevant research. First of all, the author starts with the concept of neutral help behavior, which is the upper concept of network neutral technical help behavior, and draws out the neutral help behavior from the legal disputes brought about by the rapid-broadcast case, analyzes whether it can be punished or not, and draws the point of view of restricting punishment. First of all, it emphasizes the role of objective aspects, and at the same time, it limits the scope of punishment by taking due account of subjective factors. Then it is extended to the network technology neutral help behavior, based on the particularity of the network technology neutral help behavior, the punishment is restricted. Finally, according to the provisions of the Ninth Amendment of Criminal Law to help the information network crime, the basic nature of the crime is defined, and finally, the limitations of the application of the crime in practice are analyzed. Mainly from the subjective and objective aspects of the behavior of the punishment of the relevant restrictions, in order to prevent its scope of punishment to expand too, so as to ensure that the criminal regulation of the act to achieve the degree of guilt and punishment to adapt.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊曉培;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)中立行為的刑事責(zé)任范圍[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2017年02期

2 趙津;;“快播案”的法律適用[J];人民法治;2017年02期

3 劉艷紅;;無(wú)罪的快播與有罪的思維——“快播案”有罪論之反思與批判[J];政治與法律;2016年12期

4 熊亞文;黃雅珠;;幫助信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪活動(dòng)罪的司法適用[J];人民司法(應(yīng)用);2016年31期

5 喻海松;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪的立法擴(kuò)張與司法適用[J];法律適用;2016年09期

6 溫登平;;論幫助關(guān)系的脫離[J];刑法論叢;2016年01期

7 劉艷紅;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪幫助行為正犯化之批判[J];法商研究;2016年03期

8 花岳亮;;幫助信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪活動(dòng)罪中“明知”的理解適用[J];預(yù)防青少年犯罪研究;2016年02期

9 楊彩霞;;P2P軟件和服務(wù)提供商著作權(quán)侵害刑事責(zé)任探究——以P2P技術(shù)架構(gòu)為切入點(diǎn)[J];政治與法律;2016年03期

10 靳曉婷;;淺析不作為犯罪中的先行行為[J];法制與社會(huì);2016年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2376221