本文選題：未成年人犯罪案件 + 量刑公正��； 參考：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：量刑程序是實現(xiàn)量刑規(guī)范化的程序保障,用“看得見”的方式實現(xiàn)量刑公正,實現(xiàn)量刑活動的公開透明,控制法官自由裁量權(quán)的恣意,充分保障訴訟參與人的訴訟權(quán)利。隨著社會中對未成年人加強司法保護的呼聲日漸增強,世界各國對未成年犯罪人處置方式的輕緩化趨勢亦成為主流。在我國,刑事案件中體現(xiàn)出的未成年犯罪人量刑不均衡問題,已經(jīng)引起了學(xué)界重視。 現(xiàn)行司法體制改革過程中,量刑規(guī)范化的改革進行的如火如荼,并取得了一定進展,學(xué)者們也大都提出建立相對獨立的量刑程序更適合目前中國的國情和審判實踐。本文從未成年人犯罪案件量刑失衡的現(xiàn)狀入手,分析未成年人刑事案件量刑中存在的問題及原因,并通過介紹借鑒英美法系關(guān)于未成年人犯罪案件的量刑程序,探討構(gòu)建我國未成年人犯罪案件獨立量刑程序的理論基礎(chǔ)、基本原則、程序模式并對未成年人的社會調(diào)查制度和暫緩判決制度提出完善建議,最后,在此基礎(chǔ)上針對未成年犯罪人這一特殊主體,突破合一模式或者相對獨立的審判程序規(guī)則,設(shè)置一套獨立于定罪程序的未成年人犯罪案件的量刑程序,這樣的設(shè)置有助于從程序角度出發(fā),保障量刑結(jié)果的公正并實現(xiàn)司法公正,從而最終達到對未成年人利益保護的最大化。
[Abstract]:Sentencing procedure is the procedural guarantee to realize the standardization of sentencing, to realize sentencing justice by "visible" method, to realize the openness and transparency of sentencing activities, to control the arbitrary discretion of the judge, and to fully protect the litigation rights of the litigant participants. With the increasing calls for strengthening the judicial protection of minors in the society, the trend of slowing down the handling of juvenile offenders in various countries has also become the mainstream. In our country, the imbalanced sentencing of juvenile offenders in criminal cases has aroused the attention of scholars. In the process of the reform of the current judicial system, the reform of sentencing standardization has been carried out in full swing, and has made some progress, scholars have mostly proposed to establish a relatively independent sentencing procedures more suitable for the current situation of China and trial practice. Starting from the current situation of sentencing imbalance in juvenile delinquency cases, this paper analyzes the problems and causes of sentencing in juvenile criminal cases, and introduces the sentencing procedures of juvenile delinquency cases in Anglo-American law system. This paper probes into the theoretical basis, basic principles, procedural model of the independent sentencing procedure for juvenile delinquency cases in China, and puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of the social investigation system and the reprieve system of juvenile delinquency. On this basis, aiming at the minor offender as a special subject, it breaks through the unified mode or relatively independent rules of trial procedure, and sets up a set of sentencing procedures for juvenile delinquency cases, which are independent of the conviction procedure. This kind of setting is helpful to guarantee the justice of sentencing result and realize judicial justice from the point of view of procedure, so as to maximize the protection of minors' interests.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.11

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 汪貽飛;;論社會調(diào)查報告對我國量刑程序改革的借鑒[J];當代法學(xué);2010年01期

2 陳增寶;李安;;量刑應(yīng)當具有獨立的專門程序[J];法律適用;2005年12期

3 陳瑞華;;定罪與量刑的程序關(guān)系模式[J];法律適用;2008年04期

4 陳瑞華;;論量刑信息的調(diào)查[J];法學(xué)家;2010年02期

5 熊秋紅;;中國量刑改革:理論、規(guī)范與經(jīng)驗[J];法學(xué)家;2011年05期

6 易利;;對未成年犯罪引用刑事和解制度必要性初探[J];法制與社會;2007年09期

7 傅佳唯;簡易程序不適用于少年刑事案件[J];青少年犯罪問題;1997年01期

8 何淵;美國處理未成年人犯罪案件的司法程序[J];青少年犯罪問題;2002年06期

9 李璞榮,司明燈;我國未成年被告人社會調(diào)查制度運行模式的比較分析[J];青少年犯罪問題;2003年01期

10 劉立霞;尹璐;;未成年人恢復(fù)性司法研究[J];青少年犯罪問題;2006年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王U，

本文編號：1882151