本文選題：經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房　切入點：騙購　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房是國家以物化的形式對城市住房困難人群的一種政策性保障,對解決城市低收入家庭住房困難起到了積極作用。但在經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房的開發(fā)建設(shè)過程中,申購人購房信息造假、申購過程中暗箱操作、審查程序形同虛設(shè)、相關(guān)人員收受賄賂等問題層出不窮。經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房與商品房之間巨大的差價誘惑,為權(quán)錢交易創(chuàng)造了空間,大量不符合條件的騙購者為騙購成功而與具有審批監(jiān)管職權(quán)的相關(guān)單位或部門的工作人員進(jìn)行不正當(dāng)經(jīng)濟(jì)往來。在權(quán)力得不到有力制約和監(jiān)督的情況下,“權(quán)力尋租”現(xiàn)象在所難免,與騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房有關(guān)的瀆職行為成為了經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房政策中的毒瘤。 隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房暴露的問題越發(fā)嚴(yán)重,學(xué)術(shù)理論界對騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房行為的開展了探討和研究,但與騙購行為相關(guān)聯(lián)的瀆職行為仍屬理論探討的空白。與經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房有關(guān)的瀆職行為作為一種新興的瀆職行為,在案件定性、損失認(rèn)定、因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定等方面均值得探討。筆者從職務(wù)犯罪偵查實務(wù)的角度,結(jié)合參與辦理某市房管部門工作人員涉嫌瀆職犯罪的案件的司法實踐,對涉及經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房的瀆職行為進(jìn)行分析和研究,意在評估經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房制度,并提出預(yù)防和控制這種瀆職行為的對策和建議。 在經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房申購審批過程中富有監(jiān)管職責(zé)的國家機關(guān)工作人員,通過監(jiān)守自盜、領(lǐng)導(dǎo)授意、權(quán)錢交易等方式,沒有正確履行監(jiān)管職責(zé),致使不符合申購條件的行為人成功騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房,給國家造成了巨額經(jīng)濟(jì)損失。這些國家機關(guān)工作人員的行為應(yīng)當(dāng)構(gòu)成刑法意義上的瀆職。認(rèn)定與騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房有關(guān)的瀆職行為,要重點把握職務(wù)行為與最終房產(chǎn)被騙購的結(jié)果之間的因果關(guān)系。經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房作為事關(guān)民生、民利、民心的工程,直接關(guān)系到社會和諧穩(wěn)定和低收入群眾的切身利益。在實踐中,司法機關(guān)應(yīng)當(dāng)充分行使職能,對與騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房有關(guān)的瀆職行為進(jìn)行有力查處,為經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房政策保駕護(hù)航。
[Abstract]:Affordable housing is a kind of policy guarantee for urban housing poor people in the form of materialization, which plays a positive role in solving the housing difficulties of low-income families in urban areas. However, in the process of development and construction of affordable housing, The information of requisitioners to purchase houses is falsified, the process of requisition is secretly operated, the examination procedures are virtually false, and the relevant personnel accept bribes, and so on. The huge price difference between affordable housing and commercial housing creates space for the trading of power and money. A large number of unqualified purchasers engaged in improper economic contacts with the staff of the relevant units or departments with the authority of examination and approval for the purpose of successful purchase. The phenomenon of "rent" is inevitable. Dereliction of duty related to the purchase of affordable housing has become a cancer in affordable housing policy. With the problem of exposure to affordable housing becoming more and more serious, the academic theorists have explored and studied the behavior of cheating on affordable housing. However, the dereliction of duty related to deception is still a blank in theoretical discussion. As a new kind of malfeasance, dereliction of duty related to affordable housing is identified as a case of characterization and loss. From the angle of the investigation practice of duty crime, the author combines the judicial practice of taking part in handling the cases of the staff of the housing management department of a certain city suspected of dereliction of duty. This paper analyzes and studies malfeasance related to affordable housing, which is intended to evaluate the system of affordable housing, and puts forward countermeasures and suggestions to prevent and control such malfeasance. The functionaries of state organs with supervisory responsibilities in the process of examination and approval of affordable housing applications have failed to properly perform their supervisory duties by means of self-invigilation, leadership instructions, power and money transactions, etc. As a result, the actor who does not meet the requisition conditions successfully tricked in the purchase of affordable housing, The actions of the functionaries of these state organs should constitute dereliction of duty in the sense of criminal law. It is necessary to focus on the causal relationship between job behavior and the result of the final property purchase. Affordable housing is a project that affects people's livelihood, people's interests, and people's hearts. It is directly related to the vital interests of the harmonious and stable society and the low-income masses. In practice, the judicial organs should fully exercise their functions and effectively investigate and deal with malfeasance related to the fraudulent purchase of affordable housing. Escort for affordable housing policy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F299.23;D924.393

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 張江水;梅全亭;賈勝武;;我國經(jīng)濟(jì)適用住房制度的形成與演變[J];中國儲運;2012年12期

2 周陽;吳元其;韓曉峰;;經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房政策研究綜述[J];決策咨詢通訊;2007年05期

3 龔超;;完善我國經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房制度的一些思考[J];今日南國(理論創(chuàng)新版);2009年05期

4 肖中華;瀆職罪認(rèn)定中的幾個共性問題探析[J];法學(xué)論壇;2001年05期

5 張慶立;;騙購經(jīng)濟(jì)適用房的刑法規(guī)制[J];上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(法治論叢);2012年04期

，

本文編號：1662814