電視媒體報道偵查階段刑事案件的合理界限
發(fā)布時間：2019-08-10 07:32
【摘要】：電視媒體對偵查階段的未決刑事案件進(jìn)行報道,在行使社會監(jiān)督職能的同時,也滿足了公眾的知情權(quán)。然而,如果報道失當(dāng),甚至讓犯罪嫌疑人在電視上認(rèn)罪或指認(rèn)他人犯罪,則會妨礙公正司法,削弱司法權(quán)威,進(jìn)而對嫌疑人的隱私和人格尊嚴(yán)構(gòu)成挑戰(zhàn)。為電視報道設(shè)定一個憲法性的分析框架,有助于探尋和明確報道的合理邊界,并在此基礎(chǔ)上逐步形成一套準(zhǔn)則,以確保電視媒體在報道未決刑事案件時,能夠在新聞自由、司法公正和個人權(quán)利之間維系動態(tài)的平衡。應(yīng)進(jìn)一步規(guī)范電視媒體的喉舌功能,阻卻電視媒體和偵查機(jī)關(guān)之間關(guān)系的異化,擴(kuò)張無罪推定原則的適用,保護(hù)當(dāng)事人隱私和人格尊嚴(yán)。允許受侵害的當(dāng)事人依照一般人格權(quán)條款請求私法救濟(jì),并通過建立偵查機(jī)關(guān)新聞發(fā)言人制度,強(qiáng)化媒體自律和相關(guān)機(jī)構(gòu)的職業(yè)倫理,不斷完善電視報道的公正性和適當(dāng)性。
[Abstract]:The TV media reports the outstanding criminal cases in the investigation stage, which not only exercises the social supervision function, but also satisfies the public's right to know. However, if the report is misreported, or even allow the suspect to plead guilty or identify others on television, it will hinder the fair administration of justice, weaken the judicial authority, and thus challenge the privacy and human dignity of the suspect. The establishment of a constitutional analytical framework for television reports is helpful to explore and clarify the reasonable boundaries of reporting, and on this basis, a set of guidelines is gradually formed to ensure that the television media can maintain a dynamic balance between freedom of the press, judicial justice and individual rights when reporting outstanding criminal cases. We should further standardize the mouthpiece function of TV media, block the alienation of the relationship between TV media and investigation organs, expand the application of the principle of presumption of innocence, and protect the privacy and human dignity of the parties concerned. The aggrieved parties are allowed to request private law relief in accordance with the provisions of general personality rights, and the fairness and appropriateness of television reports are constantly improved by establishing the press spokesman system of the investigation organs, strengthening the self-discipline of the media and the professional ethics of the relevant organizations.
【作者單位】： 四川大學(xué)人權(quán)法律研究中心;
【分類號】：D925.2
，
本文編號：2525069
[Abstract]:The TV media reports the outstanding criminal cases in the investigation stage, which not only exercises the social supervision function, but also satisfies the public's right to know. However, if the report is misreported, or even allow the suspect to plead guilty or identify others on television, it will hinder the fair administration of justice, weaken the judicial authority, and thus challenge the privacy and human dignity of the suspect. The establishment of a constitutional analytical framework for television reports is helpful to explore and clarify the reasonable boundaries of reporting, and on this basis, a set of guidelines is gradually formed to ensure that the television media can maintain a dynamic balance between freedom of the press, judicial justice and individual rights when reporting outstanding criminal cases. We should further standardize the mouthpiece function of TV media, block the alienation of the relationship between TV media and investigation organs, expand the application of the principle of presumption of innocence, and protect the privacy and human dignity of the parties concerned. The aggrieved parties are allowed to request private law relief in accordance with the provisions of general personality rights, and the fairness and appropriateness of television reports are constantly improved by establishing the press spokesman system of the investigation organs, strengthening the self-discipline of the media and the professional ethics of the relevant organizations.
【作者單位】： 四川大學(xué)人權(quán)法律研究中心;
【分類號】：D925.2
，
本文編號：2525069
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2525069.html
最近更新
教材專著
