【摘要】：2016年,黨的十八屆四中全會首次提出推進(jìn)“以審判為中心”的訴訟制度改革。隨后,為進(jìn)一步完善我國刑事訴訟制度,根據(jù)中央關(guān)于深化司法體制和工作機制改革的總體部署,“完善非法證據(jù)排除制度,明確非法證據(jù)排除的范圍,證明責(zé)任、審查程序和救濟途徑等”納入司法改革事項。本論文將分析論證偵查階段排除非法證據(jù)這一理念的合理性以及非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則在偵查階段如何具體實施的問題。中國的刑事訴訟程序分為三階段,即偵查階段、審查起訴階段和審判階段。從法律上來說,這三個階段是相對獨立的,雖然檢察機關(guān)作為法律監(jiān)督機關(guān),具有相應(yīng)的監(jiān)督職權(quán),但是,無論從案件的辦理深入程度來說,還是檢察機關(guān)自身力量來說,都不可能完全的對三個階段中的每一起案件“全方位不留死角”的監(jiān)督。因此,僅僅就刑事訴訟的偵查階段而言,相對于國外的警察機構(gòu),我國公安機關(guān)本身就擁有決定并實施偵查措施的權(quán)力,因此必須建立具有自身特色的證據(jù)審查制度。在此,本論文對偵查階段排除非法證據(jù)的正當(dāng)性予以論證,對這一規(guī)則在實施中存在的問題進(jìn)行分析,進(jìn)而提出偵查階段排除非法證據(jù)機制及相關(guān)配套措施的建議。推進(jìn)以“審判為中心”的訴訟制度改革是我國未來刑事司法制度改革的前進(jìn)方向,偵查階段排除非法證據(jù)的規(guī)定正是此項改革精神的最好展現(xiàn)。因此我們必須有磨礪前行的勇氣,堅定地將此項規(guī)則落實在每一起刑事案件中,切切實實回應(yīng)好人民群眾對保障人權(quán)和司法公正的需求。
[Abstract]:In 2016, the fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee for the first time proposed to promote the "trial-centric" litigation system reform. Subsequently, in order to further improve our criminal procedure system, according to the overall arrangement of the central authorities on deepening the reform of the judicial system and the working mechanism, "perfecting the system of excluding illegal evidence, clarifying the scope of the exclusion of illegal evidence, and the burden of proof," Review procedures and remedies, etc., "should be incorporated into the matter of judicial reform." This paper will analyze the rationality of the idea of excluding illegal evidence in the investigation stage and how to implement the exclusionary rule of illegal evidence in the investigation stage. The criminal procedure in China is divided into three stages, namely, the investigation stage, the examination and prosecution stage and the trial stage. Legally speaking, these three stages are relatively independent. Although the procuratorial organ, as a legal supervisory organ, has corresponding supervisory powers, however, whether from the depth of handling the case or from the power of the procuratorial organ itself, It is impossible to completely supervise every case in the three stages. Therefore, as far as the investigation stage of criminal proceedings is concerned, the public security organs in our country have the power to decide and implement the investigation measures compared with the foreign police organs, so we must establish the evidence examination system with its own characteristics. In this paper, the legitimacy of the exclusion of illegal evidence in the investigation stage is demonstrated, the problems existing in the implementation of this rule are analyzed, and the mechanism of excluding illegal evidence in the investigation stage and the relevant supporting measures are put forward. To promote the reform of litigation system with "trial as the center" is the forward direction of our country's criminal justice system reform in the future. The rule of excluding illegal evidence in the investigation stage is the best manifestation of this reform spirit. Therefore, we must have the courage to hone our way forward, firmly implement this rule in every criminal case, and respond to the needs of the people for the protection of human rights and justice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊正萬;王天子;;非法證據(jù)排除證明機制研究——以審判中心主義為視角[J];貴州民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2015年01期

2 楊正萬;;偵查環(huán)節(jié)排除非法證據(jù)思考[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年01期

3 王超;;非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的虛置化隱憂與優(yōu)化改革[J];法學(xué)雜志;2013年12期

4 楊鵬;;公安機關(guān)行政執(zhí)法領(lǐng)域非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則研究[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年08期

5 姜淑華;;我國偵查監(jiān)督機制的反思與重構(gòu)[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年03期

6 蘇鴻靖;;非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則虛化防范——以新《刑事訴訟法》為視角[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會科學(xué)(漢文版);2013年03期

7 郝躍偉;;非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則給職務(wù)犯罪偵查工作帶來的挑戰(zhàn)與機遇[J];中國檢察官;2013年07期

8 邰桂艷;;偵查監(jiān)督之程序性制裁可行性探析[J];湖南警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年01期

9 蘇喜民;閻瑋;;偵查環(huán)節(jié)的權(quán)利保障機制初探——以偵查環(huán)節(jié)實施刑事非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則為視角[J];中國刑事法雜志;2013年01期

10 朱劍冰;吳晶;;偵查監(jiān)督機關(guān)排除非法證據(jù)程序若干問題[J];湖北經(jīng)濟學(xué)院學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2013年01期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前6條

1 劉靜坤;;從非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則看偵查制度改革[N];人民公安報;2014年

2 郭志媛;;非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則實施研討會綜述[N];人民法院報;2013年

3 張旺;朱愛軍;;偵查階段證據(jù)評估排除制度初探[N];江蘇法制報;2013年

4 韓明 ;蔣曉棟;;偵查過程中如何排除非法證據(jù)[N];江蘇法制報;2013年

5 劉景;;偵查階段證據(jù)合法性審查六議題[N];檢察日報;2013年

6 陳海鷹 ;黃金鐘;;確立非法證據(jù)排除啟動、決定和救濟程序[N];檢察日報;2013年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 謝佳宏;非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則比較研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

2 楊宇冠;非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2002年

，

本文編號：2189723