刑事電子取證過程中公民隱私權(quán)保護(hù)問題研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-18 14:50
【摘要】：修訂后的《刑事訴訟法》明確了“電子數(shù)據(jù)”獨(dú)立證據(jù)形式的法律地位，因此電子證據(jù)在今后的刑事案件辦理過程中無論是作為破案線索還是定案依據(jù)都將發(fā)揮越來越重要的作用。由于電子證據(jù)收集運(yùn)用與傳統(tǒng)刑事證據(jù)相比有許多不同的地方，在電子取證的過程中，取證人員不但要侵入公民的物理空間還要侵入公民的虛擬空間，因此電子取證活動(dòng)更易對(duì)公民的隱私權(quán)造成侵害。本文將從電子取證的有關(guān)基本理論出發(fā)，對(duì)電子取證的概念和特征進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的闡述。在對(duì)電子取證侵犯公民隱私權(quán)的原因進(jìn)行詳細(xì)分析的基礎(chǔ)之上。借鑒國(guó)外有關(guān)電子取證規(guī)制方面的經(jīng)驗(yàn)，對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行電子取證措施的完善提出些許不成熟的建議，以期對(duì)我國(guó)電子取證過程中的隱私權(quán)保護(hù)這一難題有所裨益。 本文共有四章，第一章是電子取證相關(guān)基礎(chǔ)理論的概述，重點(diǎn)是對(duì)電子取證的概念和電子取證的特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的闡明，，引出電子取證與傳統(tǒng)刑事證據(jù)收集的不同之處。接下來講述電子取證在新形勢(shì)下對(duì)偵查破案的重要價(jià)值，以顯示電子取證在偵查機(jī)關(guān)現(xiàn)行偵查措施體系中的重要地位。 第二章在前一章的基礎(chǔ)之上，首先對(duì)隱私權(quán)的含義做一個(gè)簡(jiǎn)要的介紹，明確隱私權(quán)保護(hù)的范圍以及我國(guó)隱私權(quán)保護(hù)的發(fā)展歷程。接下來從電子取證對(duì)隱私權(quán)侵犯的正當(dāng)性及電子取證過程中隱私權(quán)保護(hù)的必要性兩方面來講述電子取證與公民隱私權(quán)保護(hù)關(guān)系。 第三章著重介紹電子取證的幾種主要措施，以及這幾種措施對(duì)隱私權(quán)侵犯的主要原因，并對(duì)國(guó)外有關(guān)電子取證規(guī)制的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)單的介紹。 第四章從電子取證的取證主體、取證原則、監(jiān)督機(jī)制以及權(quán)利救濟(jì)機(jī)制的設(shè)計(jì)四個(gè)方面，論述我國(guó)電子取證與公民隱私權(quán)保護(hù)的平衡機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:The revised Code of Criminal procedure clarifies the legal status of "electronic data" in the form of independent evidence. Therefore, electronic evidence will play a more and more important role in the process of handling criminal cases. Since there are many differences between the collection of electronic evidence and the traditional criminal evidence, in the process of electronic forensics, forensics personnel not only intrude into the physical space of citizens, but also invade the virtual space of citizens. Therefore, electronic forensics activities are more likely to cause infringement on citizens' right to privacy. Based on the basic theory of electronic forensics, this paper expounds the concept and characteristics of electronic forensics in detail. On the basis of the detailed analysis of the reasons why electronic forensics infringes the right of privacy of citizens. Based on the experience of foreign countries on the regulation of electronic forensics, this paper puts forward some immature suggestions for the perfection of the current electronic forensics measures in China, in order to benefit the protection of privacy in the process of electronic forensics in China. There are four chapters in this paper. The first chapter is an overview of the basic theory of electronic forensics, focusing on the concept of electronic forensics and the characteristics of electronic forensics, leading to the differences between electronic forensics and traditional criminal evidence collection. Then it tells the important value of electronic forensics in investigating and solving cases under the new situation, in order to show the important position of electronic forensics in the current investigation measure system of investigative organs. On the basis of the previous chapter, the second chapter first makes a brief introduction to the meaning of privacy, defines the scope of privacy protection and the development of privacy protection in China. Then the relationship between electronic forensics and the protection of citizens' privacy is discussed from two aspects: the legitimacy of electronic forensics against the right to privacy and the necessity of privacy protection in the process of electronic forensics. The third chapter focuses on several main measures of electronic forensics, and the main reasons for the violation of privacy rights, and briefly introduces the successful experience of foreign countries in the regulation of electronic forensics. The fourth chapter discusses the balance mechanism between electronic forensics and civil privacy protection from four aspects: the subject of electronic forensics, the principle of evidence collection, the mechanism of supervision and the design of right relief mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2;D923
本文編號(hào)：2189811
[Abstract]:The revised Code of Criminal procedure clarifies the legal status of "electronic data" in the form of independent evidence. Therefore, electronic evidence will play a more and more important role in the process of handling criminal cases. Since there are many differences between the collection of electronic evidence and the traditional criminal evidence, in the process of electronic forensics, forensics personnel not only intrude into the physical space of citizens, but also invade the virtual space of citizens. Therefore, electronic forensics activities are more likely to cause infringement on citizens' right to privacy. Based on the basic theory of electronic forensics, this paper expounds the concept and characteristics of electronic forensics in detail. On the basis of the detailed analysis of the reasons why electronic forensics infringes the right of privacy of citizens. Based on the experience of foreign countries on the regulation of electronic forensics, this paper puts forward some immature suggestions for the perfection of the current electronic forensics measures in China, in order to benefit the protection of privacy in the process of electronic forensics in China. There are four chapters in this paper. The first chapter is an overview of the basic theory of electronic forensics, focusing on the concept of electronic forensics and the characteristics of electronic forensics, leading to the differences between electronic forensics and traditional criminal evidence collection. Then it tells the important value of electronic forensics in investigating and solving cases under the new situation, in order to show the important position of electronic forensics in the current investigation measure system of investigative organs. On the basis of the previous chapter, the second chapter first makes a brief introduction to the meaning of privacy, defines the scope of privacy protection and the development of privacy protection in China. Then the relationship between electronic forensics and the protection of citizens' privacy is discussed from two aspects: the legitimacy of electronic forensics against the right to privacy and the necessity of privacy protection in the process of electronic forensics. The third chapter focuses on several main measures of electronic forensics, and the main reasons for the violation of privacy rights, and briefly introduces the successful experience of foreign countries in the regulation of electronic forensics. The fourth chapter discusses the balance mechanism between electronic forensics and civil privacy protection from four aspects: the subject of electronic forensics, the principle of evidence collection, the mechanism of supervision and the design of right relief mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2;D923
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條
1 許晶晶;;通過一起案件看公民隱私權(quán)保護(hù)問題[J];滁州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年06期
2 劉品新;論電子證據(jù)的定位——基于中國(guó)現(xiàn)行證據(jù)法律的思辨[J];法商研究;2002年04期
3 梁曉明;建議設(shè)立侵犯公民隱私權(quán)罪[J];法學(xué);1995年05期
4 楊俊;中國(guó)偵查程序與人權(quán)保障的現(xiàn)實(shí)性考察[J];公安教育;2003年04期
5 劉琴;;國(guó)際領(lǐng)域計(jì)算機(jī)取證過程中的規(guī)制研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年25期
6 王玲,錢華林;計(jì)算機(jī)取證技術(shù)及其發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[J];軟件學(xué)報(bào);2003年09期
7 張斌,李輝;計(jì)算機(jī)取證有效打擊計(jì)算機(jī)犯罪[J];網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全技術(shù)與應(yīng)用;2004年07期
本文編號(hào)：2189811
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2189811.html
最近更新
教材專著
