【摘要】：民事裁判文書公開是審判公開在新時(shí)期的具體要求。民事裁判文書的公開不僅有利于人民法院落實(shí)公開審判原則和廣泛接受人民監(jiān)督的意志，也有利于保障了公眾的參與權(quán)、知情權(quán)和監(jiān)督權(quán)。 最新修訂的《民事訴訟法》規(guī)定公眾可以查閱發(fā)生法律效力的判決書、裁定書。2014年1月1日生效的《最高人民法院關(guān)于人民法院在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)公布裁判文書的規(guī)定》規(guī)范了民事裁判文書上網(wǎng)公開制度的內(nèi)容、程序以和相關(guān)保障措施，使得在中國(guó)裁判文書網(wǎng)公開的各級(jí)法院生效的裁判文書具有統(tǒng)一的公開平臺(tái)、公開程序、公開內(nèi)容、公開保障措施，推進(jìn)實(shí)現(xiàn)司法透明化的進(jìn)程。但是相比域外國(guó)家（地區(qū)）的網(wǎng)上公開、判例形式公開以及嚴(yán)密的判決理由、合議庭少數(shù)人意見的公開，我國(guó)民事裁判文書公開在裁判文書質(zhì)量，審核程序、告知程序、技術(shù)處理程序、檢索程序等仍然存在隱患和不足。 本文共有四部分，第一部分是民事裁判文書公開制度基本理論；第二部分是我國(guó)民事裁判文書公開現(xiàn)狀及評(píng)析；第三部分是國(guó)外民事裁判文書公開現(xiàn)狀及評(píng)析；第四部分是我國(guó)民事裁判文書公開制度的完善。本文以民事裁判文書公開與審判公開、當(dāng)事人隱私保護(hù)的兩大關(guān)系為法理基礎(chǔ)，評(píng)析國(guó)內(nèi)外關(guān)于民事裁判文書公開的規(guī)制現(xiàn)狀和司法實(shí)踐現(xiàn)狀，提出在遵循全部完整公開原則、謹(jǐn)慎公開原則、統(tǒng)一公開原則的基礎(chǔ)上，完善民事裁判文書公開制度的公開的形式、內(nèi)容、程序、保障四個(gè)體系的建議。 另外，民事裁判文書上網(wǎng)公開只是民事裁判文書公開制度的一部分，還需要注意民事裁判文書本身內(nèi)容的改革方向，例如合議庭少數(shù)人意見，，當(dāng)事人雙方訴辯意見，案件質(zhì)證，證據(jù)的分析認(rèn)證等的公開。民事裁判文書應(yīng)該具有：反映完整的審判過程，說(shuō)理透徹有力，文本規(guī)范精確的特點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:The opening of civil judgment documents is the specific requirement of open trial in the new period. The publicity of civil judgment documents is not only conducive to the people's court to implement the principle of open trial and widely accept the will of the people to supervise, but also conducive to the protection of public participation, the right to know and the right to supervision. The newly amended Code of Civil procedure provides for public access to legally binding judgments, Order. The provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the publication of judgment documents by the people's Court on the Internet, effective January 1, 2014, regulate the contents, procedures, and related safeguards of the online disclosure system of civil adjudicative documents, So that the courts at all levels that are open in China's adjudicative documents network have a unified open platform, open procedures, open content, open safeguard measures, and promote the process of realizing judicial transparency. However, compared with the online publicity of foreign countries (regions), the open form of jurisprudence and the strict reasons for adjudication, the public opinion of a minority of collegiate panels, the publicity of civil adjudicative documents in China is in the quality of adjudication documents, the examination procedures, and the notification procedures. There are still hidden dangers and deficiencies in technical processing and retrieval procedures. There are four parts in this paper: the first part is the basic theory of the open system of civil adjudication documents; the second part is the current situation and evaluation of the opening of civil adjudicative documents in China; the third part is the current situation and evaluation of the opening of civil adjudicative documents abroad. The fourth part is the perfection of the open system of civil adjudication documents in our country. Based on the legal basis of the two relations between the opening of civil adjudicative documents and the open trial, and the protection of the privacy of the parties, this paper comments on the present situation of regulation and judicial practice of the openness of civil adjudicative documents at home and abroad, and puts forward that the principles of full disclosure should be followed. On the basis of the principle of careful publicity and unifying the principle of openness, the suggestions of perfecting the open form, content, procedure and protection of the four systems of the open system of civil adjudication documents are put forward. In addition, the online disclosure of civil adjudication documents is only a part of the open system of civil adjudicative documents. We also need to pay attention to the direction of reform of the contents of civil adjudicative documents, such as the opinions of a minority of the collegiate panel, the pleading opinions of both parties, and the cross-examination of cases. The publication of evidence, analysis, authentication, etc. Civil adjudication documents should have the characteristics of reflecting a complete trial process, reasoning thoroughly and accurately.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曾嬌艷;謝紅丹;;讓正義以看得見的方式實(shí)現(xiàn)——試論裁判文書與司法公信力[J];北京郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期

2 李友根;;裁判文書公開與當(dāng)事人隱私權(quán)保護(hù)[J];法學(xué);2010年05期

3 胡夏冰;;裁判文書上網(wǎng)難點(diǎn)及對(duì)策[J];法制資訊;2009年07期

4 張樸田;;裁判文書公布問題研究[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

5 高玉娟;;司法裁判中少數(shù)人意見公開之法理分析[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

6 張建文;;從判決書的私人公開看公共記錄中的隱私權(quán)保護(hù)[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年05期

7 劉麗君;于麗英;;數(shù)字化和傳統(tǒng)背景中的裁判文書公開機(jī)制[J];法學(xué);2013年08期

8 王敏;;我國(guó)民事裁判文書公開范圍的實(shí)踐檢視與法律完善[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年11期

9 江必新;程琥;;司法程序公開研究[J];法律適用;2014年01期

10 何帆;林娜;楊建文;龍飛;;外國(guó)裁判文書上網(wǎng)概況[J];法制資訊;2013年05期

本文編號(hào)：2135542