本文選題：死刑復(fù)核程序 + 死刑復(fù)核程序定位��； 參考：《煙臺(tái)大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：死刑復(fù)核程序在控制和限制死刑方面發(fā)揮著重要功能,而實(shí)現(xiàn)這一功能最為關(guān)鍵的便是辯護(hù)權(quán)的有效行使。辯護(hù)權(quán)作為維護(hù)被告人權(quán)益的手段之一,廣泛存在于各種刑事案件的審判程序中,它不僅是法律賦予被告人的權(quán)利,也是體現(xiàn)審判程序公平公正的保證。在死刑復(fù)核程序賦予被告人以辯護(hù)權(quán),使律師有效參與死刑復(fù)核程序,充分表達(dá)被告人的訴求,對(duì)死刑被告人具有極為重要的意義。2007年最高人民法院將死刑核準(zhǔn)權(quán)收回后,相繼出臺(tái)了一系列的法律法規(guī)政策,對(duì)死刑復(fù)核程序中的辯護(hù)權(quán)加以規(guī)定,使死刑被告人辯護(hù)權(quán)的行使有了初步的保障。但就現(xiàn)階段的情況來看,死刑被告人辯護(hù)權(quán)在死刑復(fù)核程序中的行使還存在諸多障礙,例如,死刑復(fù)核程序的定位不明,影響著復(fù)核程序的審核方式;辯護(hù)權(quán)立法不完善,對(duì)被告人和辯護(hù)律師在參與復(fù)核程序,行使具體權(quán)利以及權(quán)利受到侵害時(shí)的救濟(jì)等方面存在不足。在司法實(shí)踐中,復(fù)核死刑的人民法院受到以上諸多因素的影響,存在排斥辯護(hù)權(quán)的介入、妨礙辯護(hù)權(quán)有效行使的情況,無法實(shí)現(xiàn)死刑復(fù)核程序的功能。基于我國死刑程序中辯護(hù)權(quán)的行使保障不足、缺乏實(shí)效的問題,應(yīng)在明確死刑復(fù)核程序定位的基礎(chǔ)上,從以下幾個(gè)方面完善保障辯護(hù)權(quán)有效行使的程序制度。首先,明確被告人和辯護(hù)律師在死刑復(fù)核程序中的地位以及享有的具體的辯護(hù)權(quán),為被告人和辯護(hù)律師參與死刑復(fù)核程序提供堅(jiān)實(shí)的基礎(chǔ)。其次,通過實(shí)體與程序措施保障辯護(hù)權(quán)被侵害時(shí)的救濟(jì),使得被告人和辯護(hù)律師在辯護(hù)權(quán)行使受阻以及無法行使的情況下,獲得必需的救濟(jì)措施。最后,檢察機(jī)關(guān)亦應(yīng)承擔(dān)辯護(hù)權(quán)的保障職能,通過法律監(jiān)督對(duì)被告人辯護(hù)權(quán)的有效行使予以保障。
[Abstract]:The death penalty review procedure plays an important role in controlling and restricting the death penalty, and the key to the realization of this function is the effective exercise of the right to defend the defense. The right to defense, as one of the means to safeguard the rights and interests of the defendant, is widely used in the trial procedure of various criminal cases. It is not only the right given by the law to the defendant, but also the embodiment of the trial. The procedure of the review of the death penalty gives the defendant the right to defend the defendant, make the lawyer participate in the procedure of rechecking the death penalty effectively, fully express the appeal of the defendant, and have great significance to the defendant of the death penalty. After the Supreme People's Court of.2007 reclaims the death penalty approval right, a series of laws and regulations have been issued successively. The right of defense in the procedure of the review of death penalty is stipulated to ensure the exercise of the defense right of the death penalty defendant. However, in the present situation, there are many obstacles in the exercise of the defendant's right to defend the death penalty in the procedure of the review of death penalty, for example, the unidentified position of the procedure for the review of the death penalty will affect the review method of the review procedure; The right legislation is not perfect, and there are deficiencies in the participation of the defendant and the defense lawyer in the review procedure, the exercise of the specific rights and the relief of the rights when the rights are infringed. In the judicial practice, the people's Court of rechecking the death penalty is affected by the above factors, and there is an intervention to exclude the right of defence and prevent the effective exercise of the right to defend the right. To realize the function of the procedure for the review of the death penalty. Based on the lack of guarantee and the lack of actual effect in the execution of the death penalty procedure in our country, the procedural system for the effective exercise of the right to defend the defense should be perfected on the basis of the definition of the procedure for the review of the death penalty. First, it is clear that the defendant and the defense lawyer are in the procedure of the death penalty review. The status and the specific right to defense provide a solid foundation for the defendants and defense lawyers to participate in the procedure for the review of death penalty. Secondly, through substantive and procedural measures to ensure the relief of the right to defend the right of defense, the defendant and the defence lawyer obtain the necessary relief measures when the exercise of the right of defence is blocked and the law is not exercised. Finally, the procuratorial organ should also assume the protection function of the right to defense, and guarantee the effective exercise of the defendant's right of defense through legal supervision.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺(tái)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2
，

本文編號(hào)：2089462