城市房屋征收與補償?shù)乃痉ň葷芯?/H1>
發(fā)布時間：2018-06-09 11:44
本文選題：城市房屋 + 征收與補償��； 參考：《海南大學》2014年碩士論文
【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟社會的不斷發(fā)展,城市化建設也在加速推進。城市化進程中必然會伴隨著大量市政建設以及舊城區(qū)改造等建設項目的實施,而這些項目的實施都不可避免會涉及到對城市房屋的征收與補償。而且隨著城市化建設步伐的加快,城市房屋征收規(guī)模的擴大,數(shù)量的增多,使得城市房屋征收與補償領域的糾紛日益增多,城市房屋征收與補償成為最易引發(fā)社會問題的一個敏感領域。城市房屋征收與補償是我國的一項獨特的制度,因為我國實行的是城市土地所有權(quán)與城市房屋所有權(quán)相分離的二元產(chǎn)權(quán)制度,城市規(guī)劃區(qū)域內(nèi)的土地所有權(quán)歸屬于國家,而城市房屋所有者只對其房屋占用范圍內(nèi)的土地擁有有限的使用權(quán)。這樣的制度設計使得我國的城市房屋征收相較于域外國家的征收制度更繁雜,加之相關(guān)法律制度不健全,導致了城市房屋征與收補償糾紛日益突出,進而引發(fā)諸多的暴力事件和群體性事件。目前針對城市房屋征收與補償糾紛,存在行政救濟和司法救濟兩種權(quán)利救濟機制。司法救濟在城市房屋征收與補償糾紛中具備權(quán)力制約和權(quán)利救濟雙重功能,是解決城市房屋征收與補償糾紛最權(quán)威、最正式的法律程序。理應成為解決城市房屋征收與補償糾紛的最重要的途徑。 本文對城市房屋征收與補償?shù)乃痉ň葷贫冗M行研究,全文共四部分。 第一部分,圍繞城市房屋征收與補償?shù)乃痉ň葷囊话憷碚撨M行論述,主要介紹了城市房屋征收與補償?shù)母拍�、城市房屋征收與補償?shù)乃痉ň葷母拍�、特點、城市房屋征收與補償司法救濟的意義等內(nèi)容。 第二部分,立足于域外研究的視角,主要介紹了英國、美國、法國、日本這幾個國家的城市房屋征收與補償司法救濟方面的制度,并在此基礎上總結(jié)了國外的成功經(jīng)驗,如設置了完備的司法救濟制度、司法救濟與行政救濟緊密配合、司法救濟介入公共利益的確定程序、司法救濟中注重促成糾紛雙方達成合意來化解糾紛等,對完善我國的城市房屋征收與補償司法救濟具有重大的借鑒意義。 第三部分,著重論述了我國城市房屋征收與補償司法救濟的立法和司法現(xiàn)狀,并重點分析了城市房屋征收與補償?shù)乃痉ň葷写嬖诘膯栴},諸如司法地方化阻礙城市房屋征收與補償司法救濟的正常運行、城市房屋征收與補償?shù)乃痉ň葷秶^窄、城市房屋征收與補償?shù)乃痉ň葷黄胶狻⒊鞘蟹课菡魇张c補償司法救濟的審查范圍不合理等,這些問題都亟待解決。 第四部分,針對我國目前城市房屋征收與補償?shù)乃痉ň葷嬖诘默F(xiàn)實問題,提出了較為可行的六個方面的完善構(gòu)想。包括：提高城市房屋征收與補償糾紛案件審理法院的級別、擴大城市房屋征收與補償司法救濟的范圍、賦予征收機關(guān)對城市房屋征收補償協(xié)議糾紛的起訴權(quán)、準予法院對城市房屋征收與補償行為進行合理性審查、增加城市房屋征收與補償司法救濟的判決種類、引入城市房屋征收與補償司法救濟的調(diào)解制度。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of the economy and society, the urbanization construction is also accelerating. The process of urbanization must be accompanied by the implementation of a large number of municipal construction and the reconstruction of the old city area, and the implementation of these projects will inevitably involve the collection and compensation of urban housing. The enlargement of the city housing expropriation scale and the increase of the quantity make the disputes in the field of urban housing expropriation and compensation increasing. The collection and compensation of urban housing are the most sensitive areas to cause social problems. The collection and compensation of urban housing is a unique system in our country, because China implements the urban land ownership and city. The two yuan property right system separated from the ownership of the city's housing ownership, the land ownership in the urban planning area belongs to the state, and the urban housing owners only have limited use right to the land occupied by their houses. This system design makes the urban housing expropriation in China more complicated than the foreign countries. The relevant legal system is not perfect, which leads to the increasingly prominent disputes between the urban housing levy and the compensation for compensation, and then many violent incidents and mass incidents. At present, there are two rights relief mechanisms of administrative relief and judicial relief in the case of urban housing expropriation and compensation. The dual function of force restriction and right relief is the most authoritative and formal legal procedure to solve the dispute of urban housing expropriation and compensation. It should be the most important way to solve the dispute of urban housing expropriation and compensation.
This paper studies the judicial remedy system of urban housing expropriation and compensation, which consists of four parts.
In the first part, the general theory of judicial relief for urban housing expropriation and compensation is discussed. The concept of urban housing expropriation and compensation, the concept of judicial relief for urban housing expropriation and compensation, characteristics, the meaning of urban housing expropriation and compensation for judicial relief are introduced in the first part.
The second part, based on the perspective of extraterritorial research, mainly introduces the system of urban housing expropriation and compensation in Britain, the United States, France and Japan, and summarizes the successful experience of foreign countries on this basis, such as the establishment of a complete judicial relief system, the close cooperation of judicial relief and administrative relief, and the judicial rescue. It is of great significance to improve our country's housing expropriation and compensation to improve our country's housing expropriation and compensation for judicial relief.
The third part mainly discusses the legislative and judicial status of the urban housing expropriation and compensation judicial relief, and focuses on the analysis of the existing problems in the judicial relief of the urban housing expropriation and compensation, such as the normal operation of the judicial localization which hinders the urban housing expropriation and the compensation of the judicial relief, and the judicial rescue of the urban housing expropriation and compensation. The economic scope is narrow, the judicial relief of the urban housing expropriation and compensation is not balanced, and the examination scope of the urban housing expropriation and compensation judicial relief is not reasonable, and these problems need to be solved urgently.
The fourth part, in view of the current problems existing in the judicial relief of urban housing expropriation and compensation in China, put forward more feasible six aspects of the perfect conception, including: raising the level of the court to improve the cases of urban housing expropriation and compensation disputes, expanding the scope of the urban housing expropriation and compensation judicial relief, and endow the expropriation organ to the government. The right to prosecute the urban housing compensation agreement disputes, grant the court to the city housing expropriation and compensation conduct reasonable review, increase the urban housing collection and compensation judicial relief of the type of judgment, the introduction of urban housing collection and compensation of judicial relief mediation system.
【學位授予單位】：海南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 周佑勇;熊樟林;;房屋征收決定之可訴性的制度解讀——評《國有土地上房屋征收與補償條例》第14條[J];湖北社會科學;2011年10期
2 莫紀宏;論人權(quán)的司法救濟[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);2000年05期
3 劉飛;行政訴訟類型制度探析——德國法的視角[J];法學;2004年03期
4 張武揚;公共利益界定的實踐性思考[J];法學;2004年10期
5 唐杰英;;“司法強拆”可否走出征收困局[J];法學;2012年04期
6 陳發(fā)桂;;司法強拆運行機制可行性審視——基于案例分析的反思與重構(gòu)[J];福建行政學院學報;2012年01期
7 劉善春;裴建饒;;試論行政訴訟禁止判決[J];公法研究;2010年00期
8 張開俊;;房屋征收補償協(xié)議的性質(zhì)及其司法救濟途徑[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學院學報;2012年01期
9 黃東斌;;征收補償協(xié)議法律適用的困境與司法救濟[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2012年21期
10 任志強;;走出司法強拆征收困境的模式選擇[J];廣東行政學院學報;2013年01期
，
本文編號：1999611
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/1999611.html
本文選題：城市房屋 + 征收與補償��； 參考：《海南大學》2014年碩士論文
【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟社會的不斷發(fā)展,城市化建設也在加速推進。城市化進程中必然會伴隨著大量市政建設以及舊城區(qū)改造等建設項目的實施,而這些項目的實施都不可避免會涉及到對城市房屋的征收與補償。而且隨著城市化建設步伐的加快,城市房屋征收規(guī)模的擴大,數(shù)量的增多,使得城市房屋征收與補償領域的糾紛日益增多,城市房屋征收與補償成為最易引發(fā)社會問題的一個敏感領域。城市房屋征收與補償是我國的一項獨特的制度,因為我國實行的是城市土地所有權(quán)與城市房屋所有權(quán)相分離的二元產(chǎn)權(quán)制度,城市規(guī)劃區(qū)域內(nèi)的土地所有權(quán)歸屬于國家,而城市房屋所有者只對其房屋占用范圍內(nèi)的土地擁有有限的使用權(quán)。這樣的制度設計使得我國的城市房屋征收相較于域外國家的征收制度更繁雜,加之相關(guān)法律制度不健全,導致了城市房屋征與收補償糾紛日益突出,進而引發(fā)諸多的暴力事件和群體性事件。目前針對城市房屋征收與補償糾紛,存在行政救濟和司法救濟兩種權(quán)利救濟機制。司法救濟在城市房屋征收與補償糾紛中具備權(quán)力制約和權(quán)利救濟雙重功能,是解決城市房屋征收與補償糾紛最權(quán)威、最正式的法律程序。理應成為解決城市房屋征收與補償糾紛的最重要的途徑。 本文對城市房屋征收與補償?shù)乃痉ň葷贫冗M行研究,全文共四部分。 第一部分,圍繞城市房屋征收與補償?shù)乃痉ň葷囊话憷碚撨M行論述,主要介紹了城市房屋征收與補償?shù)母拍�、城市房屋征收與補償?shù)乃痉ň葷母拍�、特點、城市房屋征收與補償司法救濟的意義等內(nèi)容。 第二部分,立足于域外研究的視角,主要介紹了英國、美國、法國、日本這幾個國家的城市房屋征收與補償司法救濟方面的制度,并在此基礎上總結(jié)了國外的成功經(jīng)驗,如設置了完備的司法救濟制度、司法救濟與行政救濟緊密配合、司法救濟介入公共利益的確定程序、司法救濟中注重促成糾紛雙方達成合意來化解糾紛等,對完善我國的城市房屋征收與補償司法救濟具有重大的借鑒意義。 第三部分,著重論述了我國城市房屋征收與補償司法救濟的立法和司法現(xiàn)狀,并重點分析了城市房屋征收與補償?shù)乃痉ň葷写嬖诘膯栴},諸如司法地方化阻礙城市房屋征收與補償司法救濟的正常運行、城市房屋征收與補償?shù)乃痉ň葷秶^窄、城市房屋征收與補償?shù)乃痉ň葷黄胶狻⒊鞘蟹课菡魇张c補償司法救濟的審查范圍不合理等,這些問題都亟待解決。 第四部分,針對我國目前城市房屋征收與補償?shù)乃痉ň葷嬖诘默F(xiàn)實問題,提出了較為可行的六個方面的完善構(gòu)想。包括：提高城市房屋征收與補償糾紛案件審理法院的級別、擴大城市房屋征收與補償司法救濟的范圍、賦予征收機關(guān)對城市房屋征收補償協(xié)議糾紛的起訴權(quán)、準予法院對城市房屋征收與補償行為進行合理性審查、增加城市房屋征收與補償司法救濟的判決種類、引入城市房屋征收與補償司法救濟的調(diào)解制度。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of the economy and society, the urbanization construction is also accelerating. The process of urbanization must be accompanied by the implementation of a large number of municipal construction and the reconstruction of the old city area, and the implementation of these projects will inevitably involve the collection and compensation of urban housing. The enlargement of the city housing expropriation scale and the increase of the quantity make the disputes in the field of urban housing expropriation and compensation increasing. The collection and compensation of urban housing are the most sensitive areas to cause social problems. The collection and compensation of urban housing is a unique system in our country, because China implements the urban land ownership and city. The two yuan property right system separated from the ownership of the city's housing ownership, the land ownership in the urban planning area belongs to the state, and the urban housing owners only have limited use right to the land occupied by their houses. This system design makes the urban housing expropriation in China more complicated than the foreign countries. The relevant legal system is not perfect, which leads to the increasingly prominent disputes between the urban housing levy and the compensation for compensation, and then many violent incidents and mass incidents. At present, there are two rights relief mechanisms of administrative relief and judicial relief in the case of urban housing expropriation and compensation. The dual function of force restriction and right relief is the most authoritative and formal legal procedure to solve the dispute of urban housing expropriation and compensation. It should be the most important way to solve the dispute of urban housing expropriation and compensation.
This paper studies the judicial remedy system of urban housing expropriation and compensation, which consists of four parts.
In the first part, the general theory of judicial relief for urban housing expropriation and compensation is discussed. The concept of urban housing expropriation and compensation, the concept of judicial relief for urban housing expropriation and compensation, characteristics, the meaning of urban housing expropriation and compensation for judicial relief are introduced in the first part.
The second part, based on the perspective of extraterritorial research, mainly introduces the system of urban housing expropriation and compensation in Britain, the United States, France and Japan, and summarizes the successful experience of foreign countries on this basis, such as the establishment of a complete judicial relief system, the close cooperation of judicial relief and administrative relief, and the judicial rescue. It is of great significance to improve our country's housing expropriation and compensation to improve our country's housing expropriation and compensation for judicial relief.
The third part mainly discusses the legislative and judicial status of the urban housing expropriation and compensation judicial relief, and focuses on the analysis of the existing problems in the judicial relief of the urban housing expropriation and compensation, such as the normal operation of the judicial localization which hinders the urban housing expropriation and the compensation of the judicial relief, and the judicial rescue of the urban housing expropriation and compensation. The economic scope is narrow, the judicial relief of the urban housing expropriation and compensation is not balanced, and the examination scope of the urban housing expropriation and compensation judicial relief is not reasonable, and these problems need to be solved urgently.
The fourth part, in view of the current problems existing in the judicial relief of urban housing expropriation and compensation in China, put forward more feasible six aspects of the perfect conception, including: raising the level of the court to improve the cases of urban housing expropriation and compensation disputes, expanding the scope of the urban housing expropriation and compensation judicial relief, and endow the expropriation organ to the government. The right to prosecute the urban housing compensation agreement disputes, grant the court to the city housing expropriation and compensation conduct reasonable review, increase the urban housing collection and compensation judicial relief of the type of judgment, the introduction of urban housing collection and compensation of judicial relief mediation system.
【學位授予單位】：海南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 周佑勇;熊樟林;;房屋征收決定之可訴性的制度解讀——評《國有土地上房屋征收與補償條例》第14條[J];湖北社會科學;2011年10期
2 莫紀宏;論人權(quán)的司法救濟[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);2000年05期
3 劉飛;行政訴訟類型制度探析——德國法的視角[J];法學;2004年03期
4 張武揚;公共利益界定的實踐性思考[J];法學;2004年10期
5 唐杰英;;“司法強拆”可否走出征收困局[J];法學;2012年04期
6 陳發(fā)桂;;司法強拆運行機制可行性審視——基于案例分析的反思與重構(gòu)[J];福建行政學院學報;2012年01期
7 劉善春;裴建饒;;試論行政訴訟禁止判決[J];公法研究;2010年00期
8 張開俊;;房屋征收補償協(xié)議的性質(zhì)及其司法救濟途徑[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學院學報;2012年01期
9 黃東斌;;征收補償協(xié)議法律適用的困境與司法救濟[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2012年21期
10 任志強;;走出司法強拆征收困境的模式選擇[J];廣東行政學院學報;2013年01期
，本文編號：1999611
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/1999611.html
