發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-02 03:17

  本文選題：羈押必要性 + 審查　； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：2012年，我國(guó)《刑事訴訟法》經(jīng)歷了第二次修正，首次以立法的形式確立了檢察機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)羈押必要性進(jìn)行審查的制度。該制度改變了我國(guó)原有羈押制度附庸化、碎片化的狀態(tài)，，是我國(guó)審前監(jiān)督程序改革中的重要一步，也是本次修改的亮點(diǎn)之一。它對(duì)于解決司法實(shí)踐中“一捕了之、以捕代偵、一押到底、捕后怠偵”等問(wèn)題具有重要意義。羈押必要性審查制度是新修正的刑事訴訟法賦予檢察機(jī)關(guān)的一項(xiàng)新職責(zé)，通過(guò)探討該制度的確立意義及立法理由，發(fā)現(xiàn)破解我國(guó)長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)的輕刑化高羈押率難題的途徑。同時(shí)，通過(guò)借鑒國(guó)外羈押救濟(jì)制度中的保釋制度、定期審查制度以及人身保護(hù)令相關(guān)措施，結(jié)合我國(guó)多地的羈押必要性審查試點(diǎn)模式、經(jīng)驗(yàn)，以此構(gòu)建適應(yīng)我國(guó)特殊國(guó)情的羈押必要性審查制度。從優(yōu)化檢察監(jiān)督內(nèi)部職能工作機(jī)制的角度出發(fā)，監(jiān)所檢察部門(mén)是履行羈押必要性審查職責(zé)的適格主體。同時(shí)，根據(jù)審查內(nèi)容是輕罪、重罪還是違法羈押、羈押必要等的不同，構(gòu)建不同的審查方式，如依申請(qǐng)啟動(dòng)的聽(tīng)證審查、依職權(quán)啟動(dòng)的定期書(shū)面審查等，既可以節(jié)約刑事訴訟制度改革的成本，又能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)羈押必要性審查制度監(jiān)督和救濟(jì)的職能。羈押必要性審查制度的順利開(kāi)展不僅要立足于完善的程序設(shè)計(jì)，更要依賴于權(quán)利告知制度、溝通協(xié)作機(jī)制、跟蹤回訪機(jī)制、強(qiáng)制措施動(dòng)態(tài)變更監(jiān)督機(jī)制等一系列制度的配合。除上述正面激勵(lì)以外，還要建立對(duì)違法行為的責(zé)任追究機(jī)制，以保證羈押必要性審查制度能夠真正的發(fā)揮作用。
[Abstract]:In 2012, China's Criminal procedure Law underwent a second revision, and for the first time, the procuratorial organ established the system of examining the necessity of custody by way of legislation. This system has changed the status of subordination and fragmentation of the original detention system in our country. It is an important step in the reform of the pretrial supervision procedure in our country, and it is also one of the highlights of this revision. It is of great significance to solve the problems in judicial practice such as "one arrest, one arrest substitute investigation, one remand after arrest" and so on. The system of examining the necessity of custody is a new duty entrusted to the procuratorial organ by the newly amended Criminal procedure Law. By discussing the significance of the system and the legislative reasons, the author finds out the way to solve the problem of light punishment and high detention rate for a long time in our country. At the same time, through drawing lessons from the bail system of foreign custody relief system, periodic review system and relevant measures of habeas corpus, combined with the necessity of detention in many places in China to examine the pilot model, experience, So as to construct the system of examining the necessity of detaining according to the special situation of our country. From the angle of optimizing the working mechanism of the internal function of procuratorial supervision, the procuratorial department of the prison is the appropriate subject to perform the duty of examining the necessity of detention. At the same time, according to the differences in whether the contents of the examination are misdemeanours, felony or illegal detention, and the necessity of detaining, different ways of examination should be constructed, such as the hearing review initiated in accordance with the application, the periodic written review initiated ex officio, and so on. It can not only save the cost of the reform of the criminal procedure system, but also realize the function of supervision and relief of the necessity examination system of custody. The smooth development of the detention necessity examination system should not only be based on the perfect procedure design, but also rely on the cooperation of a series of systems, such as the right informing system, the communication and cooperation mechanism, the follow-up and return visit mechanism, the dynamic change of the supervision mechanism of the compulsory measures, and so on. In addition to the above positive incentives, we should also establish the accountability mechanism to ensure that the necessity of detention review system can really play a role.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 隋光偉;羈押屬性及適用原則[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2004年03期

2 王公義;我國(guó)司法行政體制的歷史沿革[J];中國(guó)司法;2004年01期

3 高得生;孫建榮;;論無(wú)罪推定與刑事強(qiáng)制措施之關(guān)系[J];河北公安警察職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

4 林勁松;作為憲法原則的無(wú)罪推定[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年05期

5 黃世斌;李新枝;;試論我國(guó)羈押必要性審查的主體[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年11期

6 張偉;;羈押必要性審查的探討[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年20期

7 黃文昌;;捕后羈押必要性審查制度初探[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年32期

8 張芹;楊曉穎;;羈押必要性審查的實(shí)踐應(yīng)用[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年26期

9 袁勁秋;論現(xiàn)代審前羈押制度遵循的普遍原則[J];河北法學(xué);2005年03期

10 上官春光;刑事羈押救濟(jì)的必要性和救濟(jì)制度的起源[J];檢察實(shí)踐;2004年06期

本文編號(hào)：1832152