本文選題：速裁程序 + 辯訴協(xié)商��； 參考：《法律適用》2015年12期

【摘要】：目前,速裁程序試點(diǎn)工作在各地已經(jīng)全面推開,試點(diǎn)中速裁程序適用體現(xiàn)出審判時(shí)限和開庭時(shí)限大幅縮短、程序啟動(dòng)由檢察機(jī)關(guān)主導(dǎo)、整體適用率不高、庭審功能弱化等特點(diǎn)。速裁程序在試點(diǎn)過程中暴露出四大制度設(shè)計(jì)缺陷:功能定位模糊、審前程序繁瑣、量刑激勵(lì)功能發(fā)揮不力、宣告刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)有"未審先定"嫌疑。對此,應(yīng)當(dāng)采取以下解決措施:一是明確速裁程序制度定位:以辯訴協(xié)商為核心、以提高效率為目標(biāo)的獨(dú)立訴訟程序;二是科學(xué)設(shè)置適用條件,逐步擴(kuò)大適用范圍;三是抓住證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與審前程序兩個(gè)關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié),實(shí)現(xiàn)速裁程序"提速";四是強(qiáng)化量刑激勵(lì)功能,推動(dòng)建立符合我國實(shí)際的辯訴協(xié)商程序;五是爭取在試點(diǎn)期滿后實(shí)現(xiàn)速裁程序一審終審制的立法突破。
[Abstract]:At present, the trial work of quick adjudication procedure has been pushed all over the place, the trial time limit and court session time limit have been greatly shortened, the procedure is led by procuratorial organs, the overall application rate is not high, the trial function is weakened and so on. In the process of the trial, the quick adjudication procedure exposed four major system design defects: vague function orientation, cumbersome pretrial procedure, weak function of sentencing incentive, and the suspicion of "not determining the penalty standard before trial". To solve this problem, the following measures should be taken: first, to define the orientation of the system of quick adjudication: to establish independent litigation procedure with the core of plea bargaining and the goal of improving efficiency; second, to set up the applicable conditions scientifically and to expand the scope of application step by step; Third, to grasp the two key links of proof standard and pretrial procedure, to realize the speedier adjudication procedure, to strengthen the incentive function of sentencing, and to promote the establishment of plea bargaining procedure in accordance with the reality of our country. Fifth, strive to realize the legislative breakthrough of the first instance final instance system after the expiration of the pilot program.
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院;天津市高級人民法院;
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 鄭赫楠;;“刑案速裁”觀察[J];浙江人大;2014年08期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 雷馳;;從“厲而不嚴(yán)”到“嚴(yán)而不厲”:逃稅初犯免罪的合理性芻議[J];Finance and Tax Law Review;2009年00期

2 張磊;;刑事和解在處理醫(yī)患關(guān)系中的價(jià)值研究[J];赤子(中旬);2014年18期

3 彭新林;;酌定量刑情節(jié)限制死刑適用:價(jià)值、空間與路徑[J];法學(xué);2014年09期

4 肖秀敏;林煜軒;吳佩蓮;;附條件不起訴制度的問題及對策[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年10期

5 劉博文;李泓輝;;緩刑定性在商事領(lǐng)域的適用探究——以公司法第146條第2款為視角[J];成都行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年06期

6 吳sピ，

本文編號：1832342