本文選題：刑事簡(jiǎn)易程序　切入點(diǎn)：效率　出處：《貴州民族大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展，各國(guó)的犯罪率呈現(xiàn)出普遍增長(zhǎng)得趨勢(shì)，為了處理更多的刑事案件，緩解司法壓力，各國(guó)紛紛探索簡(jiǎn)化程序的方式，刑事簡(jiǎn)易程序成為了保障公正，提高訴訟效率最直接、最為行之有效的方法。 我國(guó)1996年刑事訴訟法確立了針對(duì)輕刑簡(jiǎn)單案件的簡(jiǎn)易程序后，2003年兩高和司法部聯(lián)合發(fā)文，又增加普通程序案件簡(jiǎn)化審理的被告人認(rèn)罪案件程序，這在一定程度上減輕了刑事案件積壓和司法資源緊張的問(wèn)題，但兩者在適用中都出現(xiàn)一些問(wèn)題。在這種背景下，面對(duì)仍在不斷增長(zhǎng)的案件數(shù)量，為解決案多人少的困境，提高訴訟效率，2012年3月14日，第十一屆全國(guó)人民代表大會(huì)第五次會(huì)議審議通過(guò)了《關(guān)于修改中華人民共和國(guó)刑事訴訟法的決定》，對(duì)簡(jiǎn)易程序進(jìn)行了較大程度的變革。此次修改，在簡(jiǎn)易程序的多個(gè)具體程序設(shè)計(jì)上進(jìn)行了改進(jìn)，多方面完善了簡(jiǎn)易程序，但同時(shí)也應(yīng)意識(shí)到還有多處不足沒(méi)有得到解決。本文從刑事簡(jiǎn)易程序的立法及司法實(shí)踐入手，運(yùn)用在G省G市H區(qū)法院的調(diào)查研究結(jié)果對(duì)簡(jiǎn)易程序進(jìn)行探討。一共分為三個(gè)部分： 第一部分，刑事簡(jiǎn)易程序概述。首先通過(guò)多個(gè)學(xué)者對(duì)簡(jiǎn)易程序的不同認(rèn)識(shí)，從廣義和狹義上探討簡(jiǎn)易程序的含義。其次，，從效率、公正對(duì)刑事簡(jiǎn)易程序的功能價(jià)值進(jìn)行了分析，為其提供理論基礎(chǔ)。 第二部分，我國(guó)刑事簡(jiǎn)易程序的立法、司法現(xiàn)狀。首先，對(duì)我國(guó)刑事簡(jiǎn)易程序的修改之后的變化進(jìn)行了介紹，并對(duì)現(xiàn)行立法進(jìn)行反思。其次，從修改后刑事簡(jiǎn)易程序的司法實(shí)踐方面指出我國(guó)現(xiàn)行刑事簡(jiǎn)易程序的進(jìn)步性和存在的問(wèn)題。 第三部分，論述我國(guó)的刑事簡(jiǎn)易程序的完善措施。經(jīng)過(guò)上文的探討、分析，針對(duì)存在的具體問(wèn)題，從限制簡(jiǎn)易程序的適用范圍、構(gòu)建輕微罪書(shū)面審程序、通過(guò)設(shè)立預(yù)審制度啟動(dòng)簡(jiǎn)易程序以實(shí)現(xiàn)繁簡(jiǎn)分流、提高當(dāng)庭宣判率、尊重和保障被告人的基本權(quán)利、加強(qiáng)司法隊(duì)伍建設(shè)六方面提出了相應(yīng)的完善意見(jiàn)。
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy, the crime rate showed a common growth trend, in order to deal with more criminal cases, alleviate the pressure of justice, countries have to explore the simplified procedure, criminal summary procedure has become the guarantee of justice, improve the efficiency of litigation is the most direct, the most effective method.
In 1996, the criminal procedural law of our country has established the summary procedure for the simple case of light punishment after the 2003 high and the Ministry of Justice jointly issued a document, and increase the defendant cases of ordinary procedure simplification of the guilty plea procedure, which reduces the backlog and judicial resource in criminal cases to a certain extent, but both have some problems in the application. In this context, still face a growing number of cases, to solve the case less than the difficulties, improve the efficiency of the proceedings, in March 14, 2012, the eleventh session of the Fifth National People's Congress to approve the decision on the revision of < > People's Republic of China criminal procedure law, to the simple procedure for the greater degree change. This modification, in a specific program design simple procedure for the improvement, improvement of the summary procedure, but also should be aware that there are many The shortage has not been solved. Starting from the legislation and judicial practice of the criminal summary procedure, this paper discusses the summary procedure in the H District Court of G City, G province. It is divided into three parts.
The first part is the summary of criminal summary procedure. First, through the different understanding of summary procedure by many scholars, we discuss the meaning of summary procedure from broad sense and narrow sense. Secondly, we analyze the function value of criminal summary procedure from the perspective of efficiency and justice, and provide theoretical basis for it.
The second part, the status quo of China's criminal summary procedure legislation and judicial. Firstly, the change of criminal summary procedure of our country changes are introduced, and reflect on the current legislation. Secondly, the modified from the judicial practice of criminal summary procedure pointed out that China's current criminal summary procedure. And the progress of the the problem.
The third part discusses the criminal summary procedure of our country perfect measures. Through the above discussion and analysis, aimed at the existing problems, from the limitation of application of the summary procedure, construction of minor crime of written trial procedures, through the establishment of pre-trial system start simple procedures to achieve simplified shunt, improve the rate of RJC, respect for fundamental rights and the protection of the defendant, corresponding proposals are put forward to strengthen the six aspects of judicial ranks.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉根菊;李利君;;刑事簡(jiǎn)易程序比較研究[J];比較法研究;2009年05期

2 顧永忠;;我國(guó)刑事辯護(hù)制度的重要發(fā)展、進(jìn)步與實(shí)施——以新《刑事訴訟法》為背景的考察分析[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年06期

3 劉根菊,黃新民;從普通程序簡(jiǎn)化審看我國(guó)刑事速?zèng)Q程序的建構(gòu)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2005年03期

4 楊宇冠;劉曉彤;;刑事訴訟簡(jiǎn)易程序改革研究[J];比較法研究;2011年06期

5 徐松青;張華;;修正后刑事簡(jiǎn)易程序?qū)崉?wù)研究[J];法律適用;2012年06期

6 刑事簡(jiǎn)易程序研究課題組;;刑事簡(jiǎn)易程序擴(kuò)大適用問(wèn)題研究[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

7 左衛(wèi)民;刑事訴訟的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J];法學(xué)研究;2005年04期

8 陳衛(wèi)東,李洪江;正當(dāng)程序的簡(jiǎn)易化與簡(jiǎn)易程序的正當(dāng)化[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年02期

9 馬康;;試論刑事簡(jiǎn)易程序中的被告人權(quán)利保障——基于被告人自愿性視角[J];山西警官高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

10 耿慧茹;;比較法視野下對(duì)我國(guó)刑事簡(jiǎn)易程序的思考[J];人民司法;2012年13期

本文編號(hào)：1690459