發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-02-22 10:26

【摘要】：權(quán)利外觀法則依據(jù)權(quán)利之外觀而非權(quán)利之實(shí)在,使對外觀產(chǎn)生合理信賴之人因此獲得與其所認(rèn)為的法律狀況相一致的法律效,屬于合意主義權(quán)利變動(dòng)機(jī)制的一種例外。其在實(shí)證法上體現(xiàn)為一個(gè)個(gè)雖各具特色,但可以權(quán)利外觀法則統(tǒng)稱的制度,如善意取得、不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記薄公信力、表見代理、債權(quán)表見讓與等。權(quán)利外觀法則猶如地下水默默滋養(yǎng)著散布于民法各個(gè)角落的諸多具體制度,當(dāng)微觀具體制度的研究已相對成熟,對各制度背后所蘊(yùn)含共同機(jī)理的抽象便成為必要,以成就其體系化的研究目標(biāo)。全文除引言外,共分為五個(gè)部分。第一部分:初步介紹權(quán)利外觀法則的基本內(nèi)容,為后續(xù)研究建立基礎(chǔ)。隨后對權(quán)利外觀規(guī)則體系之統(tǒng)領(lǐng)稱謂展開檢討,在此基礎(chǔ)上指出“權(quán)利外觀法則”稱謂的妥當(dāng)性。第二部分:從內(nèi)部視角剖析權(quán)利外觀法則的基本法律構(gòu)造,具體包括以下四個(gè)方面的論述:物質(zhì)性要素、心理性要素、可歸責(zé)性、法律效果。第三部分:從外部視角揭示權(quán)利外觀法則的獨(dú)特性。在此選取了三個(gè)具有典型意義的比較對象:與大陸法上的權(quán)利外觀法則相對應(yīng)的英美法上的禁反言;與積極信賴保護(hù)模式相對應(yīng)的消極信賴保護(hù)模式—信賴損害賠償責(zé)任;以及同樣具有交易安全保障功能的無因性。第四部分:對權(quán)利外觀法則作為民法上一項(xiàng)新范式的證成,分別從其突破性、相容性、滲透性三個(gè)維度加以論述。第五部分:在權(quán)利外觀法則視野下,對我國現(xiàn)行立法展開檢討,針對其中存在的不當(dāng)與闕如,提出修正與填補(bǔ)之道。
[Abstract]:The law of appearance of rights is based on the appearance of rights rather than the reality of rights, which makes the person who has reasonable trust in appearance obtain the legal effect consistent with the legal situation that he thinks, which is an exception to the mechanism of the change of rights of consensus doctrine. It has its own characteristics, but it can be referred to as the rule of appearance of rights, such as bona fide acquisition, real estate registration and credibility, agency, creditor's rights, and so on. The law of appearance of right is like groundwater nourishing many concrete systems scattered in every corner of civil law. When the study of microscopic concrete system is relatively mature, it is necessary to abstract the common mechanism behind each system. In order to achieve its research goal of systematization. In addition to the introduction, the full text is divided into five parts. The first part: introduce the basic content of the law of appearance of rights, and establish the foundation for the following research. On the basis of this, the author points out the appropriateness of the appellation of "right appearance Law". The second part analyzes the basic legal structure of the law from the internal angle of view, including the following four aspects: material elements, psychological elements, imputability, legal effects. The third part: from the external perspective to reveal the uniqueness of the law of the appearance of rights. In this paper, three typical comparative objects are selected: the estoppel in Anglo-American law, the negative trust protection mode corresponding to the positive trust protection model, and the liability for compensation for trust damage, which corresponds to the law of the appearance of rights in continental law. And also has the transaction safety and security function without cause. The fourth part discusses the law of appearance of rights as a new paradigm of civil law from its breakthrough compatibility and permeability. The fifth part: under the view of the law of the appearance of rights, the author reviews the current legislation of our country, and puts forward the ways to amend and fill in the existing malpractice and lack of it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D913

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 劉曉華;;商事審判中權(quán)利外觀原則的適用[J];東岳論叢;2013年04期

2 丁曉春;;權(quán)利外觀原則及其類型研究[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年05期

3 劉保玉;郭棟;;權(quán)利外觀保護(hù)理論及其在我國民法典中的設(shè)計(jì)[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2012年05期

4 李長兵;;德國商法中的權(quán)利外觀責(zé)任及其借鑒[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年06期

5 姜晶玲;;欠缺交付之票據(jù)移轉(zhuǎn)中權(quán)利外觀理論的適用[J];學(xué)習(xí)與探索;2013年06期

6 季境;;占有在現(xiàn)代財(cái)產(chǎn)制度中的地位申明——一種基于動(dòng)態(tài)沖突的考察[J];河北法學(xué);2012年06期

7 姚貝;;財(cái)產(chǎn)罪客體新論[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王q;權(quán)利外觀責(zé)任[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 胡苗苗;德國民法權(quán)利外觀責(zé)任構(gòu)成要件研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2014年

2 崔明亮;權(quán)利外觀法則研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年

3 陳雨婷;論權(quán)利外觀及信賴保護(hù)規(guī)則[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

4 孫述琳;外觀保護(hù)法理探析[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

5 王燕;“與因主義”的權(quán)利外觀說[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：2428125