發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-02 15:54

【摘要】：在我國,保護(hù)計(jì)算機(jī)軟件的主要法律是著作權(quán)法、計(jì)算機(jī)軟件保護(hù)條例及反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法中一些商業(yè)秘密的規(guī)定。但是在實(shí)踐中,這些法律的表現(xiàn)卻差強(qiáng)人意,《計(jì)算機(jī)軟件保護(hù)條例》的部分條款與《著作權(quán)法》的立法精神相悖�！秾＠麑彶橹改稀返南嚓P(guān)規(guī)定明確如果一項(xiàng)發(fā)明包含算機(jī)軟件并符合一定標(biāo)準(zhǔn),可以授予專利。但同時(shí)將純粹的“計(jì)算機(jī)軟件”排除出專利客體之外。對(duì)于軟件是否能夠成為專利客體,歐美國家經(jīng)過一系列的努力,探討計(jì)算機(jī)軟件可專利主題標(biāo)準(zhǔn),但是尚無定論。正如鄭成思教授所講,探討計(jì)算機(jī)軟件的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)不應(yīng)僅僅將其看作足法理的問題,進(jìn)而將其擬作品化歸入版權(quán)法范圍或者擬技術(shù)化歸為專利法保護(hù),這樣會(huì)有其形而忽視其本質(zhì)。必須按照計(jì)算機(jī)軟件特有的屬性,并基于計(jì)算機(jī)軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的需要,平衡公眾與軟件開發(fā)商之間利益的法律政策性問題。筆者認(rèn)為專門立法保護(hù)計(jì)算機(jī)軟件是較為合理的措施,然而法律的制定并不是一件容易的事。因此,我們可以利用現(xiàn)有法律資源,對(duì)計(jì)算機(jī)軟件進(jìn)行協(xié)同保護(hù)。本文從計(jì)算機(jī)軟件特性出發(fā),結(jié)合其他影響因素;根據(jù)我國國情,同時(shí)借鑒國外先進(jìn)立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),為構(gòu)建和完善我國軟件產(chǎn)業(yè)法律協(xié)同保護(hù)提出建議。本論文分為四個(gè)部分:第一部分介紹計(jì)算機(jī)軟件協(xié)同保護(hù)法律屬性綜述,通過各國立法中關(guān)于計(jì)算機(jī)軟件及計(jì)算機(jī)程序的定義,確定本文研究對(duì)象足商業(yè)軟件中的通用軟件;第二部分對(duì)計(jì)算機(jī)軟件協(xié)同保護(hù)的影響因素進(jìn)行分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)計(jì)算機(jī)軟件兼具“作品性”與“功能性”的特殊屬性是計(jì)算機(jī)軟件協(xié)同保護(hù)主要原因,并為后文構(gòu)建我國計(jì)算機(jī)軟件協(xié)同保護(hù)法律模式做鋪墊;第三部分對(duì)現(xiàn)有計(jì)算機(jī)軟件保護(hù)模式進(jìn)行優(yōu)劣勢(shì)的分析,特別是歐美國家理論和實(shí)踐的發(fā)展和變化,為我國計(jì)算機(jī)軟件的法律保護(hù)提供借鑒意義;第四部分結(jié)合我國國情,在堅(jiān)持利益平衡原則,及充分利用現(xiàn)有的法律資源原則下,根據(jù)我國立法現(xiàn)狀和問題,對(duì)構(gòu)建計(jì)算機(jī)軟件法律協(xié)同保護(hù)提出幾點(diǎn)初步建議。
[Abstract]:In China, the main laws to protect computer software are copyright law, computer software protection regulations and some trade secrets in the anti-unfair competition law. But in practice, Some of the provisions of the computer Software Protection regulations run counter to the legislative spirit of the copyright Law. The relevant provisions of the Patent Review Guide specify that if an invention contains computer software and meets certain standards, Patents may be granted. But at the same time, the pure "computer software" is excluded from the patent object. As to whether software can be the object of patent, European and American countries have made a series of efforts to discuss the subject standard of patentability of computer software, but there is no final conclusion. As Professor Zheng Chengsi has said, discussing the intellectual property protection of computer software should not only be regarded as a legal issue, but also be classified as copyright law or patent law protection. This will have its shape and ignore its essence. It is necessary to balance the interests between the public and the software developers according to the special attributes of computer software and the needs of the development of computer software industry. The author thinks that special legislation to protect computer software is a reasonable measure, but it is not easy to make laws. Therefore, we can use existing legal resources to protect computer software collaboratively. Based on the characteristics of computer software, combined with other influencing factors, and according to the national conditions of our country, and drawing on the advanced legislative experience of foreign countries, this paper puts forward some suggestions for the construction and perfection of the coordinated legal protection of software industry in China. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part introduces the legal attributes of computer software collaborative protection, through the definition of computer software and computer program in the legislation of various countries, determines the general software in commercial software; In the second part, the author analyzes the influence factors of computer software cooperative protection, and finds that the special properties of computer software both "work" and "function" are the main reasons for computer software collaborative protection. The third part analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the existing computer software protection model, especially the development and change of the theory and practice in Europe and the United States. The fourth part combines the situation of our country, insists on the principle of balance of interests, and makes full use of the existing legal resources, according to the current situation and problems of our legislation, the fourth part is to provide reference for the legal protection of computer software in our country. Some preliminary suggestions are put forward to construct the legal cooperative protection of computer software.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京郵電大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 謝明敦;孔虹;馬捷;;ICT產(chǎn)業(yè)中的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)協(xié)同機(jī)理研究——基于協(xié)同學(xué)的理論視角[J];北京郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年03期

2 周成;;計(jì)算機(jī)軟件的專利申請(qǐng)[J];計(jì)算機(jī)應(yīng)用與軟件;2013年06期

3 楊兆輝;;計(jì)算機(jī)軟件的版權(quán)保護(hù)探析[J];華章;2013年13期

4 王岳;陳怞芳;;計(jì)算機(jī)軟件行業(yè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)分析與建議[J];山東紡織經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年10期

5 文小森;程樂;;探源古代的計(jì)算機(jī)——算盤[J];蘭臺(tái)世界;2011年23期

6 曾文革;白婧;;印度離岸軟件外包的法律保障及對(duì)我國的啟示[J];鄭州航空工業(yè)管理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期

7 王爭(zhēng);;專利制度的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)研究綜述[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

8 余翔;劉珊;;美國、歐盟計(jì)算機(jī)軟件相關(guān)發(fā)明的專利保護(hù)比較研究[J];管理學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

9 崔國斌;"文字作品"的專利法保護(hù) 計(jì)算機(jī)程序文本的可專利性分析[J];法律適用;2005年09期

10 吳漢東;財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體制度論——以無形財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)客體為主要研究對(duì)象[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2000年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 何育浩;軟件知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的法律保護(hù)研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2159941