【摘要】：從近幾年發(fā)生的字庫侵權(quán)的案件來看,司法實踐中對于計算機字體、字庫的作品屬性是什么、以及字庫保護范圍的界定各不相同,做出的裁判也互相矛盾。這樣很容易造成司法混亂不統(tǒng)一的局面,影響了司法權(quán)威也不利于糾紛的解決。此外,還可能嚴(yán)重損害字庫設(shè)計研發(fā)企業(yè)的利益,不利于我國字庫行業(yè)的發(fā)展。在理論界和實務(wù)界對字庫的保護是達成共識的,那就是字庫值得保護。但對于字庫的保護程度卻存在很大的爭議。本文通過對近年發(fā)生的幾個典型的字庫及字體侵權(quán)案件的分析,主要從五個方面對計算機字庫及字體的著作權(quán)保護進行研究。第一部分,通過近幾年發(fā)生的計算機字庫及字體著作權(quán)侵權(quán)案件,來探求該類案件在司法實踐中存在的問題及爭議；第二部分,針對第一部分的爭議焦點問題進行法律分析：主要分析我國計算機字庫的法律屬性、計算機字庫中的單個字體的法律屬性,計算機字庫以及字庫中的單個字形是否可以享有著作權(quán)等問題；第三部分,根據(jù)第二部分的分析,在現(xiàn)行《著作權(quán)法》及相關(guān)法律規(guī)范沒有明確規(guī)定如何保護計算機字庫及字體的前提下,如何來認(rèn)定計算機字體、字庫的侵權(quán),主要分析在認(rèn)定侵權(quán)過程中存在的障礙；侵權(quán)的主要形式以及侵權(quán)的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)；第四部分,考察外國法對計算機字體、字庫法律保護方面的相關(guān)做法,并進行簡要分析比較；第五部分,借鑒外國法對計算機字體、字庫的保護的相關(guān)經(jīng)驗并根據(jù)我國的實際情況進行分析,進而提出完善我國計算機字庫、字體法律保護的可行性建議。
[Abstract]:Judging from the cases of font infringement in recent years, in judicial practice, the definition of computer font, the property of the works of the font and the scope of the font protection are different, and the judgment made is also contradictory. This will easily lead to judicial confusion and disunity, affecting the judicial authority is not conducive to the resolution of disputes. In addition, it may seriously damage the interests of font design and R & D enterprises, and is not conducive to the development of Chinese font industry. In the theoretical and practical circles, there is a consensus on the protection of the font, that is, the font is worth protecting. However, there is a great controversy about the protection of the font. Based on the analysis of several typical font infringement cases in recent years, this paper mainly studies the copyright protection of computer fonts and fonts from five aspects. The first part, through the computer font and font copyright infringement cases occurred in recent years, to explore this kind of cases in the judicial practice of the problems and disputes; the second part, The first part of the dispute focus of the legal analysis: mainly analyzes the legal attributes of the computer font in our country, the legal attributes of a single font in the computer font, Whether the computer font and the individual font in the font can enjoy copyright or not; part three, according to the analysis of the second part, In the current copyright Law and related laws and regulations have not clearly stipulated how to protect the computer font and font premise, how to identify the computer font, font infringement, mainly analyzes the obstacles in the process of copyright infringement; The main forms of infringement and the standards of tort; the fourth part, the investigation of foreign laws on computer fonts, font protection related practices, and a brief analysis of the comparison; part five, drawing lessons from foreign laws on computer fonts, According to the actual situation of our country, this paper puts forward some feasible suggestions on how to perfect the legal protection of computer font and font in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 劉曉霞;;加強知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法制建設(shè) 完善知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法律法規(guī)[J];中華商標(biāo);2009年12期

2 張平;;再談計算機字體的法律保護[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年05期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 張玉瑞;[N];中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)報;2009年

，

本文編號：2160119