【摘要】：奧運(yùn)會(huì)是全世界的體育盛事,它不只涉及體育,從經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化到法律,都與奧運(yùn)息息相關(guān)。面對(duì)奧運(yùn)會(huì)的巨大商機(jī),商家紛紛想到利用這一時(shí)機(jī)宣傳自己,但如果方式不當(dāng),侵權(quán)行為也就隨之產(chǎn)生,其中最典型的就是侵犯奧林匹克標(biāo)志的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)。自2002年北京三年查獲199起奧林匹克標(biāo)志侵權(quán)案,侵犯奧林匹克標(biāo)志的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán),不僅表現(xiàn)為不法商家直接侵犯奧林匹克標(biāo)志的專有銷售權(quán),還包括利用隱性營(yíng)銷的方式打“擦邊球”,侵犯奧運(yùn)會(huì)合作伙伴的專有排他權(quán)。如何保護(hù)奧林匹克標(biāo)志知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利人的合法權(quán)利,維護(hù)奧運(yùn)會(huì)尊嚴(yán),保持奧林匹克精神的純凈性,成為一個(gè)亟待解決的問題。奧林匹克標(biāo)志的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)并不是一開始就存在。在奧運(yùn)會(huì)發(fā)展早期,由于各項(xiàng)制度并不完善,奧運(yùn)會(huì)并沒有建立起固定的標(biāo)志,因此并不存在奧運(yùn)會(huì)標(biāo)志產(chǎn)品的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)問題。1980年西班牙人薩馬蘭奇接任奧委會(huì)主席后,進(jìn)行一系列大刀闊斧的改革,正式將奧運(yùn)會(huì)引入一個(gè)全新的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展模式,并建立了影響重大的TOP計(jì)劃The Olympic Programme)。這才使得對(duì)奧林匹克標(biāo)志的保護(hù)提上日程。我國(guó)《奧林匹克標(biāo)志保護(hù)條例》的頒布,標(biāo)志著對(duì)奧林匹克標(biāo)志保護(hù)進(jìn)行法律保護(hù),《條例》共15條,于2002年2月4日由國(guó)務(wù)院發(fā)布,同年4月1日起施行,至今已經(jīng)實(shí)施九周年。本文分析了我國(guó)奧林匹克標(biāo)志知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的權(quán)利屬性以及國(guó)內(nèi)保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀,指出我國(guó)奧林匹克標(biāo)志法律保護(hù)的局限性,表現(xiàn)為專門法上的疏漏、專門法與國(guó)際法、普通法的銜接不流暢、法理上的沖突使特殊標(biāo)志保護(hù)的理論有待完善、執(zhí)法成本控制不足造成政府資源和司法的浪費(fèi)等。至此,通過對(duì)該選題的研究,了解當(dāng)前我國(guó)奧林匹克標(biāo)志的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)存在的困境,同時(shí)采取國(guó)際法與比較法的研究方法,調(diào)查研究國(guó)外關(guān)于奧林匹克標(biāo)志知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的主,要法律和典型案例,在研究國(guó)際奧林匹克標(biāo)志知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,提出適時(shí)修改和完善我國(guó)《奧林匹克標(biāo)志保護(hù)條例》的措施和建議。
[Abstract]:The Olympic Games is a sporting event all over the world. It involves not only sports, but also economy, culture and law. In the face of the huge business opportunities of the Olympic Games, merchants have thought to use this opportunity to publicize themselves, but if the way is improper, the infringement will occur, the most typical of which is to infringe the intellectual property rights of the Olympic logo. Since Beijing seized 199 cases of infringement of the Olympic logo in 2002, the infringement of the intellectual property rights of the Olympic logo has not only manifested itself in the direct infringement of the exclusive right of sale of the Olympic logo by illegal merchants. It also involves using hidden marketing to "scratch the edge" and encroach on the exclusive rights of Olympic partners. How to protect the legal rights of the holders of intellectual property rights of the Olympic symbols, safeguard the dignity of the Olympic Games and keep the purity of the Olympic spirit has become an urgent problem to be solved. The intellectual property protection of the Olympic logo does not exist in the first place. In the early days of the Olympic Games, because the systems were not perfect, the Olympic Games did not establish a fixed symbol, so there was no intellectual property protection of the Olympic logo products. After the Spanish man Samaranch took over as the IOC president in 1980, Carried out a series of radical reforms, formally introduced the Olympic Games into a new economic development model, and established the influential TOP program The Olympic Programme). This puts the protection of the Olympic logo on the agenda. The promulgation of the regulations on the Protection of the Olympic symbols in China marks the legal protection of the Olympic symbols. The regulations, which were promulgated by the State Council on February 4, 2002, came into effect on April 1 of the same year. So far the ninth anniversary of the implementation. This paper analyzes the property of the intellectual property rights of Olympic symbols in China and the present situation of domestic protection, and points out the limitations of the legal protection of Olympic symbols in China, which are manifested in the omission of special law, the special law and international law. The convergence of common law is not smooth, the conflict of legal principle makes the theory of special mark protection need to be perfected, and the insufficient control of law enforcement cost leads to the waste of government resources and judicature. So far, through the research on this topic, we can understand the dilemma of the intellectual property protection of the Olympic logo in our country at present, and at the same time adopt the research methods of international law and comparative law. To investigate and study the law and typical cases concerning the protection of intellectual property rights of Olympic symbols abroad, and on the basis of the study of the experience in the protection of intellectual property rights of international Olympic symbols, Measures and suggestions for timely revision and improvement of the regulations on the Protection of the Olympic symbols in China are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 陳慰星;;奧運(yùn)會(huì)口號(hào)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)研究[J];首都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

2 楊立新;林旭霞;;論人格標(biāo)識(shí)商品化權(quán)及其民法保護(hù)[J];福建師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期

3 呂炳斌;胡峰;;以奧林匹克標(biāo)志保護(hù)為契機(jī)完善我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度[J];河北法學(xué);2006年03期

4 劉強(qiáng);胡峰;;奧林匹克標(biāo)志的域名保護(hù)[J];上海體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

5 張玉超,孫思哲;中國(guó)奧林匹克域名的法律保護(hù)[J];山東體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

6 馬法超,于善旭;論體育標(biāo)志權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)與救濟(jì)[J];天津體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

7 胡峰;呂炳斌;段寶玫;;奧林匹克標(biāo)志知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)——基于國(guó)際法與比較法視角的研究[J];體育與科學(xué);2006年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2159706