本文選題：商業(yè)樓宇 + 所有權(quán)歸屬��； 參考：《農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展與金融》2016年11期

【摘要】：正車位抵押的法律風險,主要是因立法活動落后于現(xiàn)實實踐,導致在車位所有權(quán)歸屬及業(yè)主優(yōu)先權(quán)等方面易出現(xiàn)糾紛,以及車位可能存在權(quán)利負擔,從而影響車位抵押權(quán)的有效設立或最終實現(xiàn)。近些年來,隨著我國步入汽車社會,城市車位的價值開始凸顯。各地利用車位進行融資的現(xiàn)象逐漸增多,其中利用住宅小區(qū)與商業(yè)樓宇車位所有權(quán)進行抵押融資的較為普遍。然而,由于車位種類繁多、權(quán)屬復雜,加之"法律自制定頒布之日起,就注定落后
[Abstract]:The main reason for the legal risk of car-parking mortgage is that the legislative activities lag behind the practical practice, which leads to disputes in the ownership of parking spaces and the priority of owners, and the possible right burden of parking spaces. Thus affect the effective establishment of parking mortgage or the ultimate realization. In recent years, with China entering the automobile society, the value of urban parking space began to highlight. The phenomenon of using parking spaces to finance has gradually increased, among which the use of residential and commercial parking space ownership for mortgage financing is more common. However, due to the wide variety of parking spaces, the complexity of ownership, coupled with the "law since the date of promulgation, doomed to lag behind"
【作者單位】： 農(nóng)發(fā)行總行法律與內(nèi)控合規(guī)部;
【分類號】：D923.2
，

本文編號：2067744