【摘要】：隨著知識經(jīng)濟的不斷發(fā)展,經(jīng)濟競爭越來越紛繁復(fù)雜,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)在各國經(jīng)濟發(fā)展中愈來愈重要,但是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)不正當(dāng)使用導(dǎo)致的壟斷行為也日漸凸顯。從《反壟斷法》施行以來,用法律武器維護(hù)自身利益、公平競爭及消費者權(quán)益的法律意識也日漸普及。尤其是全球經(jīng)濟發(fā)展,跨國公司在我國進(jìn)行知識產(chǎn)權(quán)壟斷行為越來越頻發(fā)。但遺憾的是,我國關(guān)于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用規(guī)制的立法、執(zhí)法、司法方面都存在不足,法律過于原則、模糊,執(zhí)法體制、機制法效率低,司法實踐經(jīng)驗不足等原因?qū)е挛覈谥R產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)和規(guī)制方面有所欠缺。所以,對于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制問題的研究是一個具有重要意義的研究課題。從研究內(nèi)容來看,本文主要分為五個部分:第一章在反壟斷法視野下對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用問題進(jìn)行分析和界定,首先對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)特性和知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用問題做了總的概述,對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與反壟斷法既沖突又協(xié)調(diào)的復(fù)雜關(guān)系展開深入分析,為正確認(rèn)識反壟斷法規(guī)制知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用行為提供理論基礎(chǔ)。第二章主要闡述對反壟斷法規(guī)制知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用行為的必要性分析,首先概括了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用引發(fā)的反壟斷問題,如損害社會利益和他人權(quán)利、阻礙創(chuàng)新和降低經(jīng)濟效率等,以及用反壟斷法規(guī)制知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用問題帶來的益處,說明了運用反壟斷法對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用問題進(jìn)行規(guī)制是切實可行的。第三章主要介紹了我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的主要表現(xiàn)形式以及我國在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域反壟斷法立法現(xiàn)狀和司法現(xiàn)狀,指出了我國反壟斷法規(guī)制知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用存在的法律問題。第四章闡述了主要發(fā)達(dá)國家和地區(qū)對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用問題進(jìn)行法壟斷法規(guī)制的情況,主要列舉了美國、歐盟和日本在該領(lǐng)域的法律規(guī)制情況。采用比較分析方法總結(jié)出相關(guān)國家和地區(qū)對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用問題進(jìn)行反壟斷法規(guī)制對我國的啟示。第五章介紹了我國相關(guān)法律對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用問題的規(guī)制情況以及完善建議。該部分首先對我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用問題進(jìn)行法律規(guī)制現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行梳理和分析,分別從《反壟斷法》頒布以前相關(guān)法律規(guī)定和《反壟斷法》第55條解讀分析我國在相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的立法現(xiàn)狀,總結(jié)出在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用進(jìn)行法律規(guī)制過程中出現(xiàn)的各種問題,最后從宏觀上對我國具體情況提出一些完善我國《反壟斷法》規(guī)制知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用行為的建議和對策。
[Abstract]:With the development of knowledge economy, economic competition is becoming more and more complicated, intellectual property rights are becoming more and more important in the economic development of various countries, but the monopoly behavior caused by improper use of intellectual property rights has become increasingly prominent. Since the Anti-monopoly Law was put into effect, the legal consciousness of defending one's own interests with legal weapons, fair competition and consumers' rights and interests has been popularized day by day. In particular, with the development of the global economy, the monopoly of intellectual property rights by multinational corporations is more and more frequent in China. However, unfortunately, the legislation, enforcement and judicature of the abuse of intellectual property in our country are deficient, the law is too principled, vague, the law enforcement system and the mechanism law are inefficient. The lack of experience in judicial practice leads to the lack of intellectual property protection and regulation in China. Therefore, the study of anti-monopoly regulation of intellectual property abuse is an important research topic. From the point of view of the research content, this paper is divided into five parts: the first chapter analyzes and defines the abuse of intellectual property in the perspective of anti-monopoly law, first of all, it gives a general overview of the characteristics of intellectual property and the abuse of intellectual property. The complex relationship between intellectual property rights and anti-monopoly law is analyzed in depth, which provides a theoretical basis for the correct understanding of anti-monopoly law to regulate the abuse of intellectual property rights. The second chapter analyzes the necessity of anti-monopoly law to regulate the abuse of intellectual property rights. Firstly, it summarizes the antitrust problems caused by the abuse of intellectual property rights, such as harming social interests and other people's rights, hindering innovation and reducing economic efficiency. And the benefits of regulating the abuse of intellectual property rights by anti-monopoly law, which shows that it is feasible to regulate the abuse of intellectual property rights by using anti-monopoly law. The third chapter mainly introduces the main forms of abuse of intellectual property rights in China, as well as the current legislation and judicial status of anti-monopoly law in the field of intellectual property rights, and points out the legal problems in regulating the abuse of intellectual property rights in China's anti-monopoly law. In the fourth chapter, the author expounds the legal regulation of the abuse of intellectual property rights in the main developed countries and regions, mainly enumerating the legal regulations of the United States, the European Union and Japan in this field. By means of comparative analysis, this paper sums up the enlightenment of anti-monopoly law regulation on the abuse of intellectual property rights in relevant countries and regions. The fifth chapter introduces the regulation of the abuse of intellectual property rights in relevant laws of our country and the suggestions to improve it. This part firstly analyzes the current situation of the legal regulation on the abuse of intellectual property in China. According to the relevant laws and regulations before the promulgation of the Anti-monopoly Law and Article 55 of the Anti-monopoly Law, this paper analyzes the current legislative situation in the relevant fields of our country, and summarizes the various problems in the process of legal regulation on the abuse of intellectual property rights. Finally, from the macro point of view, the author puts forward some suggestions and countermeasures to improve the regulation of intellectual property abuse in China's Anti-monopoly Law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 柳丹;梁晶晶;;論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制[J];法制與社會;2013年25期

2 葉衛(wèi)平;;反壟斷法的價值構(gòu)造[J];中國法學(xué);2012年03期

3 唐元明;王立新;;淺議知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年01期

4 趙啟杉;;對我國《反壟斷法》知識產(chǎn)權(quán)除外條款的質(zhì)疑[J];東方法學(xué);2011年01期

5 董篤篤;;論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與合法壟斷權(quán)的關(guān)系[J];學(xué)理論;2010年34期

6 楊雄文;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的危害及其反壟斷規(guī)制[J];華南理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年04期

7 向東;郭廣輝;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的法律規(guī)制——以反壟斷法為視角[J];理論探索;2010年04期

8 黃勇;;反壟斷法對待知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的基本原則[J];今日財富(中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán));2010年04期

9 劉麗娟;;反壟斷法對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的限制[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年05期

10 唐斐;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)中的反壟斷與利益平衡[J];商業(yè)時代;2008年20期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 楊潔;論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的公益訴訟制度[D];蘭州大學(xué);2014年

2 白云;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法律規(guī)制研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2014年

3 曾輝;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：2242976