本文選題：破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)訴訟 + 破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：1986年12月頒布的《中華人民共和國(guó)企業(yè)破產(chǎn)法(試行)》中對(duì)爭(zhēng)議破產(chǎn)債權(quán)的確認(rèn)已有簡(jiǎn)略規(guī)定,后來(lái)2006年8月頒布的《中華人民共和國(guó)企業(yè)破產(chǎn)法》正式把爭(zhēng)議破產(chǎn)債權(quán)的確認(rèn)納入了訴訟程序。現(xiàn)行企業(yè)破產(chǎn)法第48條和58條的規(guī)定,擯棄了企業(yè)破產(chǎn)法(試行)中由債權(quán)人會(huì)議負(fù)責(zé)審查破產(chǎn)債權(quán),法院對(duì)實(shí)體債權(quán)爭(zhēng)議一裁終局的不合理制度,改成由管理人登記審查、債權(quán)人核查、法院確認(rèn)的方式來(lái)確定債權(quán)。在對(duì)管理人進(jìn)行登記債權(quán)及編制債權(quán)表記載的債權(quán)有異議時(shí),債權(quán)人、債務(wù)人、勞動(dòng)職工均可向法院提起要求確認(rèn)實(shí)體債權(quán)是否為真實(shí)、合法有效的破產(chǎn)債權(quán)的訴訟。然而企業(yè)破產(chǎn)法施行八年之久,除以上兩條原則性的規(guī)定外,尚未出臺(tái)有關(guān)破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)進(jìn)入訴訟程序的司法解釋,這種狀況給司法實(shí)踐造成了一定的混論和沖擊,不利于破產(chǎn)程序的進(jìn)行,最終影響債權(quán)人、債務(wù)人的權(quán)益以及社會(huì)公共利益。因此本文試圖對(duì)破產(chǎn)程序中破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)的訴訟程序進(jìn)行構(gòu)建及完善,以期能規(guī)范司法活動(dòng),統(tǒng)一實(shí)踐中的處理規(guī)則。本文內(nèi)容除去引言和結(jié)語(yǔ),共由四部分,三萬(wàn)余字組成。第一部分,乃爭(zhēng)議破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)訴訟的概論。先以破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)的重要性作為突破口,介紹了破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)訴訟的概念和由來(lái);通過(guò)比較破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)訴訟與其他類似訴訟的異同,說(shuō)明把爭(zhēng)議破產(chǎn)債權(quán)納入訴訟程序解決是有其存在之特殊性的;然后介紹了破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)訴訟在實(shí)踐操作中,根據(jù)提起訴訟異爭(zhēng)議人的不同而劃分的幾種訴訟類型;最后在各學(xué)說(shuō)的基礎(chǔ)上,分析比較并確定了破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)訴訟的性質(zhì)乃為確認(rèn)訴訟。第二部分,乃在我國(guó)確立破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)訴訟之考察,從現(xiàn)實(shí)性、必要性和可行性三個(gè)方面進(jìn)行具體考察分析�，F(xiàn)行法律規(guī)定的零星散落和缺失以及大量破產(chǎn)債權(quán)爭(zhēng)議的產(chǎn)生,迫切需要構(gòu)建和完善破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)訴訟制度來(lái)解決實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題;為滿足企業(yè)破產(chǎn)制度的不斷進(jìn)步發(fā)展、彌補(bǔ)法律的缺失、促進(jìn)破產(chǎn)程序的進(jìn)行以及實(shí)現(xiàn)在破產(chǎn)程序中沖突糾紛的一次性解決,也需要建立破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)訴訟;最后,通過(guò)分析域外國(guó)家和地區(qū)相關(guān)的破產(chǎn)制度以及破產(chǎn)債權(quán)異議訴訟,結(jié)合我國(guó)法學(xué)理論的發(fā)展,說(shuō)明建立該訴訟是可行的。第三部分,著重研究了破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)訴訟的訴訟主體。先簡(jiǎn)要分析破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)訴訟的訴訟主體后,本部分重點(diǎn)對(duì)債權(quán)人、債務(wù)人及管理人能否作為當(dāng)事人參與進(jìn)訴訟中來(lái)進(jìn)行解析說(shuō)明,最后就該訴訟具體訴訟類型下的各方當(dāng)事人進(jìn)行分析和設(shè)置。第四部分,就破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)訴訟相關(guān)程序性問(wèn)題的缺陷和缺失進(jìn)行完善和建構(gòu)。首先規(guī)定了提起破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)訴訟的特殊條件;其次就破產(chǎn)債權(quán)確認(rèn)訴訟的期限問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析和限定;再進(jìn)一步探討了該訴訟的管轄法院和訴訟費(fèi)的計(jì)算問(wèn)題;最后就確認(rèn)訴訟判決做出后的效力問(wèn)題作出分析說(shuō)明。
[Abstract]:The confirmation of disputed bankruptcy claims in the Enterprise bankruptcy Law of the people's Republic of China (trial) promulgated in December 1986 has been briefly stipulated. Later, the Enterprise bankruptcy Law of the people's Republic of China promulgated in August 2006 formally incorporated the recognition of disputed bankruptcy claims into the proceedings. The provisions of articles 48 and 58 of the current enterprise bankruptcy law have abandoned the unreasonable system in which the creditors' meeting is responsible for examining the bankruptcy claims in the enterprise bankruptcy law (trial), and the court has changed the unreasonable system of the final ruling of the dispute over substantive claims to that of the administrator to register and examine, The creditor checks and the court confirms the manner in which the claim is determined. When there is objection to the administrator's registered creditor's right and the creditor's right recorded in the form of creditor's rights, creditors, debtors and labor workers can file an action to the court requesting confirmation of whether the entity's creditor's rights are true, legal and effective. However, after eight years of implementation of the enterprise bankruptcy law, in addition to the above two provisions of principle, there has not been a judicial interpretation of the recognition of bankruptcy claims into the proceedings, which has caused certain confusion and impact to the judicial practice. It is unfavorable to the bankruptcy procedure, and ultimately affects the creditors, debtors' rights and interests and the social and public interests. So this paper tries to construct and perfect the procedure of confirming the bankruptcy creditor's rights in the bankruptcy procedure in order to standardize the judicial activities and unify the handling rules in practice. Apart from the introduction and conclusion, this paper consists of four parts, more than 30,000 words. The first part, is the dispute bankruptcy creditor's rights confirmation lawsuit introduction. This paper first introduces the concept and origin of bankruptcy creditor's rights recognition litigation, and compares the similarities and differences between bankruptcy creditor's rights confirmation litigation and other similar litigation, taking the importance of bankruptcy claims confirmation as the breakthrough point. It explains that it has its own particularity to bring the dispute bankruptcy creditor's rights into the litigation procedure, and then introduces several kinds of litigation types which are divided according to the different litigant of the litigant in practice. Finally, on the basis of various theories, the author analyzes and determines that the nature of bankruptcy creditor's right confirmation action is confirmation action. The second part is the investigation of the establishment of bankruptcy creditor's rights in China, from three aspects: reality, necessity and feasibility. In order to satisfy the continuous development of enterprise bankruptcy system, it is urgent to construct and perfect the system of bankruptcy creditor's rights confirmation litigation to solve the problems in practice because of the scattered and missing provisions of current laws and regulations as well as the emergence of a large number of disputes over bankruptcy claims. To make up for the deficiency of the law, to promote the process of bankruptcy and to resolve the conflict dispute in the bankruptcy proceedings, we also need to establish the bankruptcy claim confirmation lawsuit. By analyzing the bankruptcy system of foreign countries and regions and the dissenting litigation of bankruptcy creditor's rights, and combining with the development of our country's legal theory, it is proved that it is feasible to set up this lawsuit. The third part focuses on the subject of bankruptcy claims confirmation litigation. After a brief analysis of the litigant of the confirmation of bankruptcy creditor's rights, this part focuses on whether the creditor, the debtor and the administrator can participate as the parties in the litigation, and explain whether the creditor, the debtor and the administrator can participate in the proceedings. Finally, the parties involved in the specific litigation type are analyzed and set up. In the fourth part, the defects and defects of the procedural issues related to the bankruptcy creditor's rights confirmation litigation are perfected and constructed. First of all, the special conditions of initiating the bankruptcy claim confirmation action are stipulated; secondly, the time limit of the bankruptcy claim confirmation action is analyzed and limited, and the issue of the jurisdiction court and the calculation of the lawsuit costs are further discussed. Finally, the confirmation of the effectiveness of the judgment after the issue of analysis and explanation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.92

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宋晶;王暉;;論破產(chǎn)管理人的職責(zé)[J];職業(yè);2007年24期

2 黃少彬;;對(duì)我國(guó)設(shè)立簡(jiǎn)易破產(chǎn)程序的建議[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)與管理;2008年12期

3 黃少彬;;我國(guó)設(shè)立簡(jiǎn)易破產(chǎn)程序的必要性探析[J];江蘇技術(shù)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(職教通訊);2009年12期

4 黃少彬;;我國(guó)設(shè)立簡(jiǎn)易破產(chǎn)程序的必要性可行性及路徑研究[J];江南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年06期

5 劉靜;;試論當(dāng)代個(gè)人破產(chǎn)程序的結(jié)構(gòu)性變遷[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年04期

6 王東光;;消費(fèi)者債權(quán)在破產(chǎn)程序中的優(yōu)先地位——基于風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分擔(dān)的視角[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期

7 王華;;論破產(chǎn)程序中商標(biāo)使用許可合同的處理——以管理人為主要視角[J];中國(guó)石油大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年06期

8 郭瑞;江河;;破產(chǎn)程序:破解執(zhí)行難問(wèn)題的路徑選擇——以無(wú)財(cái)產(chǎn)可供執(zhí)行案件為視角[J];法律適用;2013年01期

9 趙廣宇;;善用德國(guó)企業(yè)破產(chǎn)程序[J];中國(guó)海關(guān);2013年04期

10 鄒海林;試析破產(chǎn)程序中的幾個(gè)基本問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1994年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前5條

1 關(guān)憲法;;破產(chǎn)程序中的訴訟時(shí)效適用之分析[A];2009中華全國(guó)律師協(xié)會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)專業(yè)委員會(huì)年會(huì)論文集[C];2009年

2 張倫;;破產(chǎn)程序中的審判公開(kāi)與群眾路線相結(jié)合[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（2011年第1輯）[C];2011年

3 李建立;;上市公司破產(chǎn)程序中信息披露的責(zé)任人[A];2009中華全國(guó)律師協(xié)會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)專業(yè)委員會(huì)年會(huì)論文集[C];2009年

4 仲崇玉;;破產(chǎn)程序與民事執(zhí)行程序的沖突及協(xié)調(diào)——對(duì)實(shí)施《破產(chǎn)法》的一點(diǎn)建議[A];中國(guó)商法年刊（2007）：和諧社會(huì)構(gòu)建中的商法建設(shè)[C];2007年

5 于鳳瑞;;論動(dòng)產(chǎn)浮動(dòng)抵押所擔(dān)保的債權(quán)在破產(chǎn)程序中的實(shí)現(xiàn)——《物權(quán)法》的創(chuàng)新與《破產(chǎn)法》的挑戰(zhàn)[A];中國(guó)商法年刊（2007）：和諧社會(huì)構(gòu)建中的商法建設(shè)[C];2007年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 孟巖峰;諾奇欠債20億或走破產(chǎn)程序[N];中國(guó)紡織報(bào);2014年

2 池偉宏;執(zhí)行轉(zhuǎn)破產(chǎn)程序的改革設(shè)想[N];民主與法制時(shí)報(bào);2014年

3 記者　宋世益;俄羅斯法院宣布啟動(dòng)尤科斯破產(chǎn)程序[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)參考報(bào);2006年

4 本報(bào)記者 劉加瑩;廣州家誼非得走“破產(chǎn)程序”嗎？[N];中國(guó)商報(bào);2005年

5 上海市長(zhǎng)寧區(qū)人民法院 劉亞玲　李騰;探索執(zhí)行不能轉(zhuǎn)破產(chǎn)程序的新舉措[N];人民法院報(bào);2011年

6 田彥紅;破產(chǎn)程序啟動(dòng)廣州樣板超市或成黑洞？[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)營(yíng)報(bào);2005年

7 ;破產(chǎn)程序（6）[N];廣東科技報(bào);2002年

8 本報(bào)記者 李冰;億佰購(gòu)物破產(chǎn)程序仍未完成 受害用戶欲集體維權(quán)[N];證券日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

9 池偉宏 廣東省深圳市中級(jí)人民法院;執(zhí)行轉(zhuǎn)破產(chǎn)程序的運(yùn)行機(jī)制與機(jī)構(gòu)改革設(shè)想[N];人民法院報(bào);2014年

10 記者 張文君;三鹿進(jìn)入破產(chǎn)程序 凈資產(chǎn)負(fù)11億[N];河北經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 丁文聯(lián);論企業(yè)破產(chǎn)程序中的利益平衡[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2005年

2 張作順;破產(chǎn)程序法律制度研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2002年

3 鄭維煒;破產(chǎn)的國(guó)際私法問(wèn)題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 郭嶺楠;簡(jiǎn)易破產(chǎn)程序研究[D];哈爾濱工程大學(xué);2010年

2 董德成;論我國(guó)破產(chǎn)程序的目的及其對(duì)立法與司法的影響[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2003年

3 張麗利;破產(chǎn)程序啟動(dòng)問(wèn)題研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

4 王婷鈺;證券公司行政處置與破產(chǎn)程序的銜接[D];華東政法大學(xué);2009年

5 李哲;期權(quán)、重整權(quán)與破產(chǎn)程序[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2002年

6 王力;建筑物上的權(quán)利順位及其在破產(chǎn)程序中的實(shí)現(xiàn)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2013年

7 鄭余秋;論證券公司破產(chǎn)程序中的客戶保護(hù)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2009年

8 董文彬;破產(chǎn)程序權(quán)力制衡機(jī)制之研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2009年

9 田璧;證券公司破產(chǎn)程序初探[D];四川大學(xué);2006年

10 趙莉;論破產(chǎn)程序的開(kāi)始[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：2048515