本文選題：親權　切入點：未成年子女　出處：《復旦大學》2008年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】： 親權是父母基于其身份,對于未成年子女以教養(yǎng)保護為目的之權利義務的集合。親權制度是近現(xiàn)代各國民法中,規(guī)范父母與子女關系的一項重要的法律制度。由于我國現(xiàn)行親屬法制度的欠缺,在實踐中發(fā)生了很多父母與未成年子女間的爭議或糾紛,尤其表現(xiàn)在未成年子女的隱私權、財產(chǎn)權、人身權等三個方面。本文通過分析發(fā)生糾紛的原因,借鑒其他國家和地區(qū)法律制度中的規(guī)定,分析了我國在親子關系上立法的缺失與不足,重點對親權與未成年子女上述權利間的沖突進行了分析,提出了具體的制度性的完善建議,以充分保護未成年子女的合法權益,同時保障父母對親權的合理行使。 本文由四個部分組成: 第一章親權制度基本理論。簡要介紹了親權制度的起源及演化過程、內(nèi)容與性質(zhì)以及我國與親權相關的制度,并提出了所存在的問題。 第二章親權與未成年子女隱私權。闡述了隱私權與未成年子女隱私權的基本概念與范圍,分析了我國目前未成年人隱私權和親權的沖突的表現(xiàn)形式與原因。提出了親權與未成年子女隱私權沖突的協(xié)調(diào)規(guī)則,即在法律中確立親權制度,在未成年人保護法等法律中明確禁止父母侵犯未成年子女隱私權的典型行為,以及在立法中明確規(guī)定兩個權利沖突時的協(xié)調(diào)原則。 第三章未成年人財產(chǎn)權。首先通過兩個典型案例引出實踐中涉及未成年人財產(chǎn)權的典型案件及涉及問題。其次簡要介紹了未成年人財產(chǎn)權歷史發(fā)展以及賦予未成年人財產(chǎn)權的意義;對未成年人財產(chǎn)的范圍進行了界定;分析了父母對未成年子女財產(chǎn)的權利義務,父母對未成年子女財產(chǎn)的處分及其效力。最后,分析了我國現(xiàn)行保護未成年人財產(chǎn)權的法律體系,指出了現(xiàn)行立法的缺陷,提出了自己的立法建議,并對所舉的兩個案例結合本文觀點進行了解答。 第四章未成年子女人身權。首先分析了與未成年子女人身權相關的三個概念:管教權、保護教育權、懲戒權。其次對于兩大法系具有代表性的國家和地區(qū)對于管教權的規(guī)定進行了簡要介紹。再次通過父母侵害未成年子女人身權的具體行為,從社會歷史、父母自身、現(xiàn)行法律制度欠缺等三個角度分析了原因,最后,通過對懲戒權是否應入典的爭論,提出了關于未成年人人身權保護的立法建議。
[Abstract]:Parental right is a collection of rights and obligations of parents based on their identity and aiming at the protection of minor children. The system of parental authority is a civil law in modern and modern countries. It is an important legal system to regulate the relationship between parents and children. Because of the lack of the current relative law system in our country, there have been many disputes or disputes between parents and minor children in practice, especially in the right to privacy of minor children. By analyzing the causes of disputes and drawing lessons from the legal system of other countries and regions, this paper analyzes the lack and deficiency of legislation on parent-child relations in China. This paper analyzes the conflict between parental right and the above rights of minor children, and puts forward some specific institutional suggestions to fully protect the legitimate rights and interests of minor children, and at the same time to ensure the reasonable exercise of parental rights by parents. This paper consists of four parts:. The first chapter briefly introduces the origin and evolution process, content and nature of paternity system and the system related to paternity in China, and puts forward the existing problems. The second chapter expounds the basic concept and scope of the right to privacy and the right to privacy of minor children. This paper analyzes the forms and causes of the conflict between the right to privacy and parental right of minors in our country, and puts forward the coordination rules of the conflict between parental right and the right of privacy of minor children, that is, to establish the system of parental right in the law. The typical behavior of parents violating the right to privacy of minor children is explicitly prohibited in laws such as the law on protection of minors, and the principle of coordination when the two rights conflict is clearly stipulated in the legislation. The third chapter introduces the property rights of minors. Firstly, through two typical cases, it leads to the typical cases and problems concerning the property rights of minors in practice. Secondly, it briefly introduces the historical development of the property rights of minors and the imputation of minors' property rights. The meaning of adult property rights; It defines the scope of minor property, analyzes the rights and obligations of parents to the property of minor children, and the disposition and effectiveness of parents to minor children's property. This paper analyzes the current legal system of protecting the property rights of minors in our country, points out the defects of the current legislation, puts forward its own legislative suggestions, and gives an answer to the two cases given in this paper. Chapter 4th analyzes the personal rights of minor children. Firstly, three concepts related to the personal rights of minor children are analyzed: the right to discipline, the right to education, the right to education, and the right to education. Secondly, it briefly introduces the provisions of the right of discipline in the representative countries and regions of the two major legal systems. Again, through the specific acts of parents infringing upon the personal rights of minor children, from the social history, the parents themselves, This paper analyzes the reasons from three angles, such as the deficiency of the current legal system, and finally puts forward some legislative suggestions on the protection of the personal rights of minors through the debate on whether the right of punishment should be included in the code.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：D923

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 林楓;論未成年人財產(chǎn)監(jiān)護制度[D];西南財經(jīng)大學;2011年

2 於洛;學校教育中的家長教育權利及其保障研究[D];江西師范大學;2012年

3 劉偉;親權濫用法律問題研究[D];山東大學;2013年

，

本文編號：1620762