本文選題：環(huán)境保護(hù) + 公益訴訟��； 參考：《河南大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：新《環(huán)境保護(hù)法》以及《民事訴訟法》增添了關(guān)于環(huán)境民事公益訴訟的條款,加強(qiáng)了司法權(quán)力對環(huán)境生態(tài)破壞問題的管控能力,通過司法手段解決環(huán)境污染、保護(hù)生態(tài)環(huán)境侵害糾紛逐步被大眾熟知和接受,此舉也成為了彌補(bǔ)環(huán)境管理中行政機(jī)關(guān)失靈的良方。伴隨著環(huán)境污染問題對人們生活的影響加深,社會(huì)各個(gè)群體對生態(tài)環(huán)境問題意識(shí)的也逐步提升,需要通過司法解決的環(huán)境侵害案件勢必逐漸變多。若仍依據(jù)傳統(tǒng)訴訟理論對此類新形態(tài)案件予以審理,就會(huì)對環(huán)境民事公益訴訟的判決實(shí)質(zhì)效力的生效范圍以及法律關(guān)系的安定方面產(chǎn)生不利的影響。因此在環(huán)境民事公益訴訟中,既要堅(jiān)持既判力相對性原則的基礎(chǔ),也應(yīng)當(dāng)適當(dāng)?shù)貙⒓扰辛Φ闹饔^范圍進(jìn)行擴(kuò)張,以利于環(huán)境保護(hù)問題的實(shí)際、快速解決。本文由緒言、正文和結(jié)語構(gòu)成,從司法實(shí)踐出發(fā),結(jié)合國內(nèi)外先進(jìn)制度和經(jīng)驗(yàn),將環(huán)境民事公益訴訟制度研究與既判力理論研究相結(jié)合,通過對概念的明晰以及對外延的確定,闡述了在什么樣的情況之下對裁判的效力進(jìn)行擴(kuò)張及其擴(kuò)張的范圍、方式等問題。另外,擴(kuò)張?bào)w系構(gòu)建的情況下討論了第三人撤銷之訴以及當(dāng)事人處分權(quán)限制等程序保障問題,從而維護(hù)判決的正當(dāng)性基礎(chǔ),實(shí)現(xiàn)環(huán)境民事公益訴訟實(shí)踐中的程序正義和實(shí)體公正,達(dá)到其應(yīng)有的法律價(jià)值。第一部分主要明晰了本文所提及的主要理論的基礎(chǔ)概念和內(nèi)涵。闡述了環(huán)境公益和環(huán)境私益實(shí)質(zhì)上的不同,并概述了既判力體系的基礎(chǔ)理論和學(xué)界對此仍存在有爭議的部分。通過基礎(chǔ)理論的明晰和界定為后面文章寫作進(jìn)行了基礎(chǔ)的鋪墊。第二部分著重介紹了我國現(xiàn)有的立法和司法現(xiàn)狀,立足于對現(xiàn)狀的分析闡述了現(xiàn)有既判力體系下環(huán)境民事公益訴訟終結(jié)后所作出裁決的效力范圍所存在的問題,從而提出效力范圍擴(kuò)張的必要性。第三部分主要是對比分析了域外地區(qū)涉及環(huán)境公益訴訟的法律制度以及判決既判力主觀范圍的擴(kuò)張情況,明確了該訴訟類型下判決效力擴(kuò)張案外人的可行性。并對域外的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)進(jìn)行總結(jié),發(fā)現(xiàn)其可取之處為我國制度的完善提供一定的借鑒。第四部分主要是針對我國現(xiàn)有的環(huán)境法律體系下訴訟既判力擴(kuò)張局限,提出與之相互銜接的制度體系的構(gòu)建。立足于現(xiàn)有制度框架提出涉及環(huán)境公共利益的訴訟模式存在的不足和改進(jìn)之處。
[Abstract]:The new "Environmental Protection Law" and the "Civil procedure Law" have added provisions on environmental civil public interest litigation, strengthened the ability of judicial power to control and control environmental ecological damage, and solved environmental pollution through judicial means.The dispute of protecting ecological environment infringement has gradually been known and accepted by the public, which has also become a good remedy for the failure of administrative organs in environmental management.With the impact of environmental pollution on people's lives, the awareness of ecological environmental problems of various social groups is also gradually enhanced, the need to solve the need for judicial settlement of environmental violations is bound to become more and more.If this kind of new case is still tried according to the traditional litigation theory, it will have an adverse effect on the effective scope of the judgment substantive effect of the environmental civil public interest litigation and the stability of the legal relationship.Therefore, in environmental civil public interest litigation, we should not only adhere to the principle of relativity of res judicata, but also properly expand the subjective scope of res judicata in order to facilitate the practical and rapid solution of environmental protection problems.This paper consists of preface, text and conclusion, starting from judicial practice, combining advanced systems and experiences at home and abroad, combining the research of environmental civil public interest litigation system with the theory of res judicata, through the definition of concept and extension.This paper expounds the expansion of the referee's effectiveness under what circumstances and the scope and ways of its expansion.In addition, under the circumstances of the construction of the expansion system, this paper discusses the procedural protection issues such as the revocation of the action by the third party and the restriction of the party's right to dispose, so as to maintain the legitimacy of the judgment.To achieve procedural justice and substantive justice in the practice of environmental civil public interest litigation, to achieve its due legal value.The first part clarifies the basic concepts and connotations of the main theories mentioned in this paper.This paper expounds the essential differences between environmental public welfare and environmental private interests, and summarizes the basic theory of res judicata system and the controversial parts in academic circles.Through the clarity and definition of the basic theory for the following article writing for the foundation of the groundwork.The second part focuses on the current legislative and judicial situation in China, based on the analysis of the current situation of environmental civil public interest litigation based on the existing res judicata system after the end of the ruling after the effectiveness of the scope of the existing problems.Therefore, the necessity of expanding the scope of effectiveness is put forward.The third part mainly compares and analyzes the legal system involving environmental public interest litigation and the expansion of the subjective scope of judgment res judicata, and clarifies the feasibility of the outsider in the case of expansion of judgment validity under this type of litigation.The author sums up the advanced experience and finds that it can provide some reference for the perfection of our country's system.In the fourth part, aiming at the limitation of the expansion of res judicata of litigation under the existing environmental law system in China, the author puts forward the construction of the system which is connected with each other.Based on the existing institutional framework, this paper puts forward the shortcomings and improvements of litigation mode involving environmental public interest.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D922.68;D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王燦發(fā);;中國環(huán)境公益訴訟的主體及其爭議[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李曉輝;論既判力主觀范圍的擴(kuò)張[D];湘潭大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1748782