【摘要】：審查起訴制度是整個(gè)刑事訴訟制度的重要組成部分和重要訴訟環(huán)節(jié)。它向前要履行偵查監(jiān)督職能,向后要做出是否提起公訴的決定；一方面要保證整個(gè)刑事訴訟的順利進(jìn)行,另一方面要保證訴訟當(dāng)事人合法權(quán)益不受到來自訴訟活動(dòng)的“不當(dāng)侵害”,但審查起訴制度也不是盡善盡美的,也存在需要完善的地方。本文通過概述介紹我國審查起訴的概念、特征、期限、對(duì)象、基本任務(wù)、流程等基本內(nèi)容,以案例形式反映出審查起訴工作實(shí)踐存在問題,這些問題主要是：非羈押型措施的濫用、放任偵查機(jī)關(guān)濫用偵查手段、證物的移交和審查不嚴(yán)格、證據(jù)的審查不夠?qū)徤鳌Ｗ詈?以存在的問題為契機(jī)研究我國的審查起訴監(jiān)督制度的完善方法。
[Abstract]:The examination and prosecution system is an important part of the whole criminal procedure system and an important litigation link. It must perform the function of investigation and supervision forward and make the decision on whether to prosecute or not; On the one hand, it is necessary to ensure the smooth progress of the entire criminal proceedings, on the other hand, to ensure that the legitimate rights and interests of the litigants are not "improperly infringed" by the litigation activities, but the system of examining and prosecuting is not perfect either. There are also areas that need to be improved. This paper introduces the concept, characteristics, duration, object, basic task, process and so on of the review of prosecution in our country, and reflects the problems existing in the practice of reviewing and prosecuting in the form of case. These problems are: abuse of non-custodial measures, laissez-faire abuse of investigative techniques, lack of strict transfer and examination of exhibits, and inadequate examination of evidence. Finally, taking the existing problems as a turning point to study the perfect methods of the supervision system of our country's review and prosecution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2;D926.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 谷國文;現(xiàn)代刑事審判模式評(píng)析[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1998年01期

2 汪建成,王敏遠(yuǎn);刑事訴訟法學(xué)研究述評(píng)[J];法學(xué)研究;2001年01期

3 俞洪慶;淺議審查起訴中的告知程序[J];人民檢察;2000年10期

4 宋英輝;張建港;;刑事程序中警、檢關(guān)系模式之探討[J];政法論壇;1998年02期

5 陳光中,陳海光,魏曉娜;刑事證據(jù)制度與認(rèn)識(shí)論——兼與誤區(qū)論、法律真實(shí)論、相對(duì)真實(shí)論商榷[J];中國法學(xué);2001年01期

6 程雷;;檢察官的客觀義務(wù)比較研究[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

7 吳瑞群;;保障被害人權(quán)益的重要手段——完善審查起訴階段的告知機(jī)制[J];中山大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)論叢;2005年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2407792