【摘要】：我國(guó)減刑程序應(yīng)用廣泛,而現(xiàn)行法律法規(guī)對(duì)減刑程序的規(guī)定已經(jīng)明顯不足以應(yīng)對(duì)實(shí)務(wù)中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題以及減刑程序本身正當(dāng)性的需求。解決減刑程序中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題除了對(duì)其進(jìn)行根本制度性規(guī)則的重建之外,完善對(duì)減刑程序的檢察監(jiān)督也是不能被忽視的一條有效途徑。并且筆者認(rèn)為完善檢察機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)減刑程序的監(jiān)督更有現(xiàn)實(shí)意義,即在現(xiàn)有體制下以較小的權(quán)力變動(dòng)換取較大的制度價(jià)值以及社會(huì)價(jià)值。另外較小的權(quán)力變動(dòng)也意味著可執(zhí)行性、可操作性的提高,制度的預(yù)期效果會(huì)更加易于實(shí)現(xiàn),解決方案也就更具有現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)�；谶@種認(rèn)識(shí),本文選取了減刑程序檢察監(jiān)督這一個(gè)相對(duì)較小的視角,對(duì)其完善進(jìn)行了討論。 本文第一部分主要界定了與減刑程序檢察監(jiān)督相關(guān)的基礎(chǔ)概念以及完善減刑程序檢察監(jiān)督的重要意義。此部分論述主要解釋了減刑、減刑程序、減刑的性質(zhì)、減刑程序的適用范圍和檢察監(jiān)督等概念,闡述了筆者對(duì)該領(lǐng)域概念的認(rèn)識(shí);以及減刑程序檢察監(jiān)督的完善對(duì)杜絕權(quán)力濫用、實(shí)現(xiàn)正當(dāng)程序和保障被監(jiān)禁人權(quán)利等方面的意義。本文第二部分重點(diǎn)分析了我國(guó)減刑程序檢察監(jiān)督的現(xiàn)狀,首先羅列了我國(guó)減刑程序檢察監(jiān)督方面主要的法律規(guī)定,并闡述了現(xiàn)有法定檢察監(jiān)督途徑的失效;其次以數(shù)據(jù)顯示了減刑程序在我國(guó)廣泛運(yùn)用的司法實(shí)踐以及完善減刑程序檢察監(jiān)督的必要性;最后以現(xiàn)實(shí)途徑失效為出發(fā)點(diǎn),抽象出造成這種失效的檢察監(jiān)督體制的宏觀缺陷,即減刑程序檢察監(jiān)督標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的模糊性及檢察監(jiān)督權(quán)力設(shè)置的不平衡性。第三部分提出了完善我國(guó)減刑程序檢察監(jiān)督的具體途徑,具體為檢察機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)法院減刑案件審理方式的檢察監(jiān)督以及對(duì)減刑裁定救濟(jì)的檢察監(jiān)督;檢察機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)監(jiān)管機(jī)關(guān)申報(bào)減刑材料以及不申報(bào)減刑的檢察監(jiān)督。此外,因?yàn)閱渭円揽课覈?guó)現(xiàn)行的減刑制度無(wú)法提出有效的程序性保障手段,所以第三部分還會(huì)涉及對(duì)減刑制度必要實(shí)體制度的構(gòu)建。經(jīng)過(guò)以上論述希望能夠解決我國(guó)減刑程序檢察監(jiān)督中存在的問(wèn)題,并通過(guò)強(qiáng)化檢察機(jī)關(guān)檢察監(jiān)督的職能構(gòu)建更加正當(dāng)合理的監(jiān)督機(jī)制以深化減刑制度對(duì)被監(jiān)禁人改造以及社會(huì)秩序等方面的良好效能。
[Abstract]:The commutation procedure is widely used in our country, but the provisions of current laws and regulations on commutation procedure are obviously insufficient to deal with the problems in practice and the demand of the legitimacy of commutation procedure itself. In addition to the reconstruction of fundamental institutional rules, it is also an effective way to improve the procuratorial supervision of commutation procedure. And the author thinks that it is more practical to perfect the supervision of the procuratorial organ to the commutation procedure, that is, under the existing system, the smaller power change can be exchanged for the larger system value and the social value. In addition, the small power change also means that the executability and maneuverability will be improved, the expected effect of the system will be more easily realized, and the solution will have a more realistic foundation. Based on this understanding, this paper selects a relatively small perspective of procuratorial supervision of commutation procedure and discusses its perfection. The first part of this paper mainly defines the basic concepts related to the procuratorial supervision of commutation procedure and the significance of perfecting the procuratorial supervision of commutation procedure. This part mainly explains the concepts of commutation, commutation procedure, the nature of commutation, the scope of application of commutation procedure and procuratorial supervision, and expounds the author's understanding of the concept in this field. And the improvement of procuratorial supervision of commutation procedure is significant to prevent abuse of power, realize due process and protect the rights of imprisoned persons. The second part of this paper focuses on the analysis of the current situation of procuratorial supervision of commutation procedure in China. Firstly, it lists the main legal provisions of procuratorial supervision of commutation procedure in China, and expounds the invalidation of the existing statutory ways of procuratorial supervision. Secondly, it shows the judicial practice of commutation procedure widely used in our country and the necessity of perfecting the procuratorial supervision of commutation procedure. Finally, it abstracts the macroscopic defects of the procuratorial supervision system that caused this invalidation by taking the failure of practical approach as the starting point. The fuzziness of procuratorial supervision standard of commutation procedure and the imbalance of procuratorial supervision power. The third part puts forward the specific ways to improve the procuratorial supervision of the commutation procedure in China, specifically for the procuratorial supervision of the trial mode of the court commutation cases and the procuratorial supervision of the relief of the commutation ruling. The procuratorial organ shall supervise the supervision over the declaration of commutation materials and the non-reporting of commutation of sentence. In addition, the third part will also involve the construction of the necessary substantive system of commutation system because it is impossible to put forward effective procedural safeguard means by relying solely on the current commutation system of our country. After the above discussion, I hope to solve the problems existing in the procuratorial supervision of the commutation procedure in our country. And through strengthening the function of procuratorial supervision of procuratorial organs to build a more legitimate and reasonable supervision mechanism to deepen the commutation system of prisoners reform and social order and other aspects of good efficiency.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D926.34;D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 程紹燕;減刑程序研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2008年

2 彭海濱;我國(guó)減刑制度的反思與重塑[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2157252