評(píng)析美國判例法中董事注意義務(wù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及其借鑒意義
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-03-02 18:04
本文選題:董事注意義務(wù) 切入點(diǎn):群體決策理論 出處:《吉林大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】: 隨著公司制度的發(fā)展,為了確保公司合理地開展各項(xiàng)經(jīng)營活動(dòng),董事會(huì)被賦予了廣泛的權(quán)力?同時(shí),為了防止董事會(huì)權(quán)力擴(kuò)張所帶來的種種弊端,各國公司法均明確規(guī)定了董事的各種義務(wù)?嚴(yán)格追究董事責(zé)任,可以避免公司及股東可能因董事的不良行為所遭受的損失,但同時(shí)我們也應(yīng)該看到,在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的當(dāng)今社會(huì),公司經(jīng)營活動(dòng)是復(fù)雜多變的,要求董事的所有經(jīng)營決策或活動(dòng)都取得成功是不現(xiàn)實(shí)的,而且過于嚴(yán)格的責(zé)任可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致董事在經(jīng)營中謹(jǐn)小慎微,其結(jié)果也不利于股東利益的最大化?如何合理地設(shè)定董事義務(wù),追究董事責(zé)任,是各國立法機(jī)關(guān)亟需解決的問題?我國2006年1月1日實(shí)施的ǎ中華人民共和國公司法ǐ對(duì)董事的注意義務(wù)作了原則性的規(guī)定,但是為了更好地保障公司ǐ股東及第三人的利益,還需要在借鑒國外先進(jìn)立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國的具體情況,進(jìn)一步明確和完善董事的注意義務(wù)?
[Abstract]:With the development of the company system, the board of directors has been given extensive powers to ensure that the company carries out all kinds of business activities reasonably. At the same time, in order to prevent all kinds of malpractice brought by the expansion of the board of directors' power, the company law of every country has clearly stipulated all kinds of obligations of directors? Strict accountability of directors can avoid the loss that companies and shareholders may suffer as a result of the directors' bad behavior. But at the same time, we should also see that in today's society of economic globalization, the business activities of companies are complex and changeable. It is unrealistic to require directors to succeed in all their business decisions or activities, and too strict liability may lead to directors being cautious in their operation, and the result is not conducive to the maximization of shareholders' interests. How to set up the director's duty reasonably and investigate the director's responsibility is a problem that the legislatures of various countries need to solve urgently. The Company Law of the people's Republic of China, which came into effect in January 1st 2006, provides in principle the duty of care of directors, but in order to better protect the interests of shareholders and third parties of the company, Also need to learn from foreign advanced legislative experience, combined with the specific situation of our country, further clarify and improve the duty of care of directors?
【學(xué)位授予單位】:吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2010
【分類號(hào)】:D971.2;DD912.29
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 朱羿錕;彭心倩;;論董事誠信義務(wù)的法律地位[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年04期
2 候富強(qiáng),王衡;董事注意義務(wù)研究[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2002年Z3期
3 郟文慧;董事注意義務(wù)的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];檢察實(shí)踐;2005年02期
,本文編號(hào):1557588
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/1557588.html
最近更新
教材專著