明代典例法律體系的確立與令的變遷——“律例法律體系”說(shuō)、“無(wú)令”說(shuō)修正
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2019-07-06 17:41
【摘要】:傳統(tǒng)的明代"律例法律體系"說(shuō)、"無(wú)令"說(shuō)應(yīng)當(dāng)修正。明代建立的新法律體系是按照"以典為綱、以例為目"的框架構(gòu)建的,應(yīng)總稱(chēng)或簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)為"典例法律體系"。"律例法律體系"說(shuō)忽視了《明會(huì)典》系"大經(jīng)大法"和洪武年間頒行的《大明令》等十一種法律并非刑事法律這一基本史實(shí),因而失之偏頗。明初在變革傳統(tǒng)律令法律體系時(shí),把單行"令"的稱(chēng)謂變換為"事例",二者名異而實(shí)同;《大明令》不僅在明開(kāi)國(guó)后百余年間被奉為必須遵行的成法,即使正德、萬(wàn)歷兩朝《明會(huì)典》融《大明令》入典后,其有效條款仍在行用;明人以詔令頒布國(guó)家重大事項(xiàng)、把"制例"稱(chēng)為"著為令"的傳統(tǒng),直至明末未變,所謂"明代無(wú)令"說(shuō)不能成立。
文內(nèi)圖片:
圖片說(shuō)明:正德《明會(huì)典》頒行后明代法律體系構(gòu)成圖
[Abstract]:The traditional law legal system of Ming Dynasty said that the theory of "no order" should be amended. The new legal system established in Ming Dynasty was constructed according to the framework of "taking canon as the outline and taking examples as the purpose", which should be called "legal system of examples". The theory of "legal system of laws" ignores the basic historical facts that eleven kinds of laws, such as "Dajing Dafa" and "Daming decree" promulgated by Hongwu during the Ming Dynasty, are not criminal laws, so they are biased. In the early Ming Dynasty, when the legal system of the traditional law was changed, the appellation of the single line "order" was transformed into "case", and the names of the two were the same. "Daming order" was not only regarded as a method that must be followed for more than a hundred years after the founding of the Ming Dynasty, but even after Zhengde and Wanli's "Ming Dynasty canon" were incorporated into the code, its effective provisions were still in use. The Ming people promulgated the important matters of the state by imperial edict, and called "making legislation" the tradition of "writing as order". Until the end of Ming Dynasty, the so-called "Ming Dynasty without order" said that it could not be established.
【作者單位】: 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院法學(xué)研究所;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D929
本文編號(hào):2511215
文內(nèi)圖片:
圖片說(shuō)明:正德《明會(huì)典》頒行后明代法律體系構(gòu)成圖
[Abstract]:The traditional law legal system of Ming Dynasty said that the theory of "no order" should be amended. The new legal system established in Ming Dynasty was constructed according to the framework of "taking canon as the outline and taking examples as the purpose", which should be called "legal system of examples". The theory of "legal system of laws" ignores the basic historical facts that eleven kinds of laws, such as "Dajing Dafa" and "Daming decree" promulgated by Hongwu during the Ming Dynasty, are not criminal laws, so they are biased. In the early Ming Dynasty, when the legal system of the traditional law was changed, the appellation of the single line "order" was transformed into "case", and the names of the two were the same. "Daming order" was not only regarded as a method that must be followed for more than a hundred years after the founding of the Ming Dynasty, but even after Zhengde and Wanli's "Ming Dynasty canon" were incorporated into the code, its effective provisions were still in use. The Ming people promulgated the important matters of the state by imperial edict, and called "making legislation" the tradition of "writing as order". Until the end of Ming Dynasty, the so-called "Ming Dynasty without order" said that it could not be established.
【作者單位】: 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院法學(xué)研究所;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D929
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 懷效鋒;;論明代司法中的皇權(quán)[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1988年05期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條
1 唐文基;;明代糧食倉(cāng)儲(chǔ)制度[A];明史研究論叢(第六輯)[C];2004年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 李媛;明代國(guó)家祭祀體系研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2009年
2 江繼海;明代官吏職務(wù)犯罪研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2005年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條
1 姚燕;論《明會(huì)典》中的行政法文化[D];華東師范大學(xué);2010年
2 張澤慧;萬(wàn)歷《明會(huì)典》之兵部云南史料校注[D];云南大學(xué);2015年
3 陳云峰;明代河西屯田研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2008年
4 劉海榮;明代陜西巡檢司研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2009年
5 程佳;論明代官服制度與禮法文化[D];山西大學(xué);2008年
,本文編號(hào):2511215
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2511215.html
教材專(zhuān)著