發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-01-05 09:21

【摘要】：在我國(guó)古代的刑法制度上,保辜制度是重要的一項(xiàng)法律制度,這一制度的目的在于對(duì)于在人身傷害的案件中受害人的合法權(quán)益進(jìn)行保護(hù),對(duì)加害人所受應(yīng)承受的法律責(zé)任進(jìn)行追究,對(duì)于社會(huì)關(guān)系進(jìn)行整合的制度。在我國(guó)古代社會(huì)中這一制度實(shí)行了兩千多年。保辜制度發(fā)展的成熟期是在唐代,在此時(shí)這一制度得到了系統(tǒng)化和定型化的發(fā)展。在宋代、元代、明代和清代保辜制度獲得了繼續(xù)發(fā)展,在司法和立法等相關(guān)領(lǐng)域也出現(xiàn)了一些變化。該制度本身有其規(guī)律性,并且其思想淵源深刻。所謂刑事和解指的是對(duì)于原有的案件通過(guò)雙方相互協(xié)商并且合作的方式來(lái)對(duì)其進(jìn)行解決和恢復(fù),通常是在刑事訴訟案中,被害人和加害人雙方之間主要是通過(guò)賠償、道歉和認(rèn)罪等方式來(lái)解決矛盾、修復(fù)關(guān)系,從而實(shí)現(xiàn)和解,但是國(guó)家司法機(jī)關(guān)并不對(duì)加害人進(jìn)行相關(guān)刑事的追責(zé)。從20世紀(jì)70年代,西方國(guó)家就已經(jīng)確立、完善刑事和解,促進(jìn)案件的加害人對(duì)于被害人進(jìn)行賠償、撫慰,改造和教育加害人,發(fā)揮司法資源的最大化利用。本文主要針對(duì)中國(guó)古代保辜制度內(nèi)涵,發(fā)展成因進(jìn)行詳細(xì)分析的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合現(xiàn)代刑事和解制度及實(shí)踐狀況,分析了古代保辜制度對(duì)現(xiàn)代“刑事和解”的啟示。
[Abstract]:In the criminal law system of ancient China, the system of protecting Koo is an important legal system. The purpose of this system is to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the victims in cases of personal injury. Investigate the legal responsibility of the perpetrator and integrate the social relationship. This system has been practiced for more than two thousand years in the ancient society of our country. The mature period of the system was in the Tang Dynasty, at which time, the system was systematized and formalized. In the Song Dynasty, Yuan Dynasty, Ming Dynasty and Qing Dynasty, the system of protecting Koo was continued to develop, and there were some changes in related fields such as judicature and legislation. The system itself has its own regularity, and its ideological origin is profound. The so-called criminal reconciliation refers to the settlement and restoration of the original cases through mutual consultation and cooperation between the two sides. Usually, in criminal proceedings, the victims and the perpetrators mainly through compensation. Apologies and confessions are used to resolve conflicts, repair relationships, and achieve reconciliation, but the national judicial authorities do not pursue the perpetrators of related criminal liability. Since the 1970s, the western countries have established and perfected the criminal reconciliation, and promoted the victimizer to compensate, comfort, reform and educate the victim to maximize the use of judicial resources. Based on the detailed analysis of the connotation and causes of the development of the system of protection of the Koo in ancient China, combined with the system of modern criminal reconciliation and its practical situation, this paper analyzes the enlightenment of the system of protecting and protecting the Koo in ancient China to the modern "reconciliation of criminal justice".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D929

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 程曉璐;;附條件不起訴制度的適用[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年06期

2 陳興良;;刑法教義學(xué)與刑事政策的關(guān)系:從李斯特鴻溝到羅克辛貫通 中國(guó)語(yǔ)境下的展開(kāi)[J];中外法學(xué);2013年05期

3 武強(qiáng);張富興;史輝;;刑事公訴案件和解程序之略考[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年03期

4 孫大明;;古代保辜制度與當(dāng)今人身傷害鑒定[J];中南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年04期

5 謝軍;;現(xiàn)代遷移過(guò)程中保辜制度的損害賠償責(zé)任研究[J];安徽行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年01期

6 謝軍;;論保辜制度的“被害救助”功能之現(xiàn)代遷移[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2013年01期

7 郭梨影;;新刑訴下檢察機(jī)關(guān)適用刑事和解的思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年05期

8 侯繼虎;;古代保辜制度對(duì)現(xiàn)代法治的啟示[J];滄桑;2012年06期

9 黃太云;;刑事訴訟法修改釋義[J];人民檢察;2012年08期

10 李中和;;從曲元衡杖殺柏公成之母案看唐代保辜制度[J];貴州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2401570