美國(guó)對(duì)華反傾銷成因及對(duì)策研究
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of international trade, the trade frictions between China and the United States are increasing day by day. The United States frequently uses trade protection measures to prevent its domestic industries from being harmed by imported products, and anti-dumping investigations are one of the important means. From the beginning of 1995 to the first half of 2010, the total number of anti-dumping cases filed by the United States against China reached 101, accounting for nearly 1/4 of the total number of anti-dumping cases filed by the United States. Once the Chinese enterprises lose the anti-dumping investigation against China, it will directly lead to the industry involved in China to pay huge anti-dumping duty, and its market share will shrink seriously, and even be completely squeezed out of the American market. Therefore, American anti-dumping against China and China's coping strategies are important issues worth studying. This paper analyzes the damage and causes of American anti-dumping against China from the point of view of law, and puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions. This paper is divided into five chapters: the first chapter summarizes the current situation of American antidumping against China in recent years and analyzes the characteristics of US anti-dumping against China in recent years. The second chapter introduces the anti-dumping legal system of the United States and WTO in detail. The first part of the third chapter analyzes the economic and political reasons of the frequent anti-dumping investigations against China from the macro level. The second part from the specific provisions of the United States anti-dumping law, respectively from the normal value, non-market economy status, separate tax rate, causality and other four key points for in-depth analysis, and combined with a case to elaborate. The fourth chapter analyzes in detail the measures that should be taken to deal with American antidumping at the level of government, enterprise and middle level of society, and gives some policy suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:D996.1;D971.2;DD912.29;F752.02
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 江瑩瑩;張端明;;應(yīng)對(duì)國(guó)外反傾銷:基于反傾銷會(huì)計(jì)信息質(zhì)量特征視角——以美國(guó)對(duì)華汽車擋風(fēng)玻璃反傾銷案為例[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊(綜合版);2008年01期
2 涂詠梅;;國(guó)際貿(mào)易政策的政治經(jīng)濟(jì)分析——以美國(guó)對(duì)中國(guó)輸美紡織品設(shè)限為例[J];財(cái)政監(jiān)督;2010年06期
3 朱志晟,張亮;被政治化了的法律問題:評(píng)美國(guó)反傾銷法中的非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)國(guó)家界定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年05期
4 米歇爾○.慕爾 ,劉陽;美國(guó)反傾銷法律改革——日落條款[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年12期
5 馬光明;趙峰;;美國(guó)對(duì)華貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義加速的政策原因分析[J];對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)實(shí)務(wù);2010年02期
6 張蔓;;中國(guó)入世后美歐對(duì)華貿(mào)易保護(hù)比較[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年29期
7 王受文;并非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)待遇問題——美國(guó)反傾銷分別稅率政策分析[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2005年02期
8 阮振宇;反傾銷法與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法的關(guān)系——從WTO“美國(guó)1916年反傾銷法案”談起[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2001年02期
9 張亮;單獨(dú)稅率將成鏡中花——美國(guó)對(duì)非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)國(guó)家的反傾銷政策將出現(xiàn)倒退[J];WTO經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;2005年06期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條
1 西安交通大學(xué)絲綢之路國(guó)際法與比較法研究所 華雨婷;[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2011年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 王榮康;WTO框架下的反傾銷啟動(dòng)程序研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2002年
2 閆星;美國(guó)信息產(chǎn)業(yè)利益集團(tuán)政治參與的研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2006年
3 馮耀祥;美國(guó)對(duì)華貿(mào)易保護(hù)成因研究[D];南開大學(xué);2009年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條
1 傅聲國(guó);應(yīng)對(duì)歐盟對(duì)華反傾銷[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年
2 程春;對(duì)華反傾銷中非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)地位問題研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2007年
3 劉志彬;美國(guó)反傾銷“單獨(dú)稅率”政策研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2007年
4 徐麗芳;美國(guó)對(duì)華貿(mào)易政策的政治經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[D];上海師范大學(xué);2009年
5 王品;經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī)背景下新貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義對(duì)我國(guó)外貿(mào)的影響和對(duì)策分析[D];上海師范大學(xué);2010年
,本文編號(hào):2362141
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2362141.html