中國容隱制度的歷史考察及其現(xiàn)代意義
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-27 09:37
【摘要】：二十世紀以來,實證法學受到越來越多的質(zhì)疑,世界各國開始普遍地承認法律的道德性,這種傾向被稱之為自然法的復興。如果從比較法的角度來看,容隱制度的現(xiàn)代化轉(zhuǎn)型也未嘗不可以看作是這一運動在中國的體現(xiàn)。本文旨在討論容隱制度的歷史及其現(xiàn)代意義,一方面是對中國本土法治資源的整理,另一方面也是對當代法學思潮的回應(yīng)。筆者相信,容隱制度的現(xiàn)代化轉(zhuǎn)型不僅僅具有刑事訴訟法的意義,應(yīng)當還具有更為深遠的法學意義,因為它是中國法學主體性的一種追求,也是一種融入現(xiàn)代法學主流的嘗試。中國容隱制度的現(xiàn)代化,有著非常深遠的現(xiàn)代意義。本文認為這種意義主要體現(xiàn)在以下五個方面：第一,它有利于促進立法與社會的和諧,并最終有利于和諧社會的形成；第二,它是對中國固有法律制度中優(yōu)良傳統(tǒng)的弘揚；第三,它有助于降低法律移植的風險；第四,它能夠保障法益之間的相互平衡；第五,它可以節(jié)約法治成本。最后,因為本文認為法律不僅僅是一種裁判的準則,它同時應(yīng)該也是一種價值的載體以及文化的符號,所以本文在容隱制度的歷史考察過程中,大量地進行了價值分析和文化解讀,筆者深信這種分析和解讀的方法將有益于加深我們對容隱制度的理解。
[Abstract]:Since the 20th century, the empirical law has been questioned more and more, and the countries all over the world began to universally recognize the morality of law, which is called the revival of natural law. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the history and modern significance of the concealment system, on the one hand, to sort out the local legal resources in China, on the other hand, to respond to the ideological trend of contemporary law. The author believes that the modern transformation of the concealment system not only has the significance of criminal procedure law, but also has more profound legal significance, because it is a pursuit of the subject of Chinese jurisprudence and an attempt to merge into the mainstream of modern jurisprudence. The modernization of China's concealment system has profound modern significance. This paper holds that this meaning is mainly reflected in the following five aspects: first, it is conducive to the promotion of legislation and social harmony, and ultimately conducive to the formation of a harmonious society, second, it is to promote the Chinese inherent legal system in the good tradition; Third, it can help to reduce the risk of law transplantation; fourth, it can guarantee the mutual balance between legal interests; fifth, it can save the cost of the rule of law. Finally, because this paper holds that law is not only a criterion of adjudication, it should also be a carrier of value and a symbol of culture, so in the course of the historical investigation of the concealment system, A great deal of value analysis and cultural interpretation have been carried out, and the author is convinced that this method of analysis and interpretation will be helpful to deepen our understanding of the system of tolerance.
【學位授予單位】：西南交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D929;D924
本文編號：2360249
[Abstract]:Since the 20th century, the empirical law has been questioned more and more, and the countries all over the world began to universally recognize the morality of law, which is called the revival of natural law. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the history and modern significance of the concealment system, on the one hand, to sort out the local legal resources in China, on the other hand, to respond to the ideological trend of contemporary law. The author believes that the modern transformation of the concealment system not only has the significance of criminal procedure law, but also has more profound legal significance, because it is a pursuit of the subject of Chinese jurisprudence and an attempt to merge into the mainstream of modern jurisprudence. The modernization of China's concealment system has profound modern significance. This paper holds that this meaning is mainly reflected in the following five aspects: first, it is conducive to the promotion of legislation and social harmony, and ultimately conducive to the formation of a harmonious society, second, it is to promote the Chinese inherent legal system in the good tradition; Third, it can help to reduce the risk of law transplantation; fourth, it can guarantee the mutual balance between legal interests; fifth, it can save the cost of the rule of law. Finally, because this paper holds that law is not only a criterion of adjudication, it should also be a carrier of value and a symbol of culture, so in the course of the historical investigation of the concealment system, A great deal of value analysis and cultural interpretation have been carried out, and the author is convinced that this method of analysis and interpretation will be helpful to deepen our understanding of the system of tolerance.
【學位授予單位】：西南交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D929;D924
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王桂芳;親屬拒證權(quán)淺見[J];湖北社會科學;2005年04期
2 丁志;;我國親屬容隱制度的歷史發(fā)展及其分析[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬);2011年05期
3 董明珠;;淺談親親相隱制度的重構(gòu)[J];法制與社會;2009年04期
4 許燕;;淺議唐代容隱制度及其現(xiàn)代意蘊[J];法制與社會;2009年20期
5 廖滿棠;;論親屬間的容隱制度[J];法制與社會;2009年21期
6 王嘉;;關(guān)于“親親相隱”的研究[J];法制與社會;2011年04期
7 張中秋;;中國傳統(tǒng)法律的公法文化屬性[J];華東政法學院學報;2005年06期
8 王瑞娟;;論傳統(tǒng)容隱制度的現(xiàn)代重構(gòu)——從法學、倫理學的視角[J];懷化學院學報;2008年07期
9 郭靜;;論親屬間容隱權(quán)利在我國法律中的構(gòu)建[J];牡丹江大學學報;2011年07期
10 張中秋;法治及其與德治關(guān)系論[J];南京大學學報(哲學.人文科學.社會科學版);2002年03期
，本文編號：2360249
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2360249.html
