本文選題：產(chǎn)品缺陷 + 產(chǎn)品召回　； 參考：《河北經(jīng)貿大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：產(chǎn)品召回制度是隨著商品經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展、科學技術的進步和對消費者利益保護的重視逐步發(fā)展起來的,它是現(xiàn)代市場法制進步的重要標志。產(chǎn)品召回制度是建立在對人的生命和財產(chǎn)更加尊重、對人權愈加重視的理念之上的,體現(xiàn)了對消費者權益進行保護的立法傾斜,是尊重人權、保護人權在經(jīng)濟關系中的具體表現(xiàn)。 美國是世界上第一個確立產(chǎn)品召回制度的國家,該制度的確立始于對缺陷汽車產(chǎn)品的召回。目前,美國是當今世界上產(chǎn)品召回制度發(fā)展最迅速、最完備、最具代表性的國家,其立法與司法實踐對西方一些發(fā)達國家的產(chǎn)品召回制度立法具有較大的影響。 我國加入WTO后,國際貿易往來增多,外國商品大量進入中國市場,有關進口貨物的投訴和糾紛逐漸多了起來,消費者將廠家和經(jīng)銷商告上法庭的案例屢屢見諸報端。而我國消費者在面對國外產(chǎn)品缺陷問題時,相比歐美國家的消費者來說往往得不到公平的待遇。究其原因,是我國缺少完善的產(chǎn)品召回制度。目前,我國對產(chǎn)品召回制度的認識和立法均處于初級階段。而經(jīng)過幾十年的探索與實踐,美國在產(chǎn)品召回方面的法律體系和管理制度已經(jīng)相當?shù)慕∪屯陚?本文正是在這種背景下,通過對中美產(chǎn)品召回法律制度的比較研究,進一步完善我國的產(chǎn)品召回制度。 本文除了引言和結論外共分為三部分。先對產(chǎn)品召回制度的相關概念、理論基礎和與其他制度的區(qū)別等基本問題進行論述,并對中美產(chǎn)品召回制度的若干法律問題進行比較分析,然后對我國產(chǎn)品召回制度的不足和必要性進行探討,借鑒美國先進的立法經(jīng)驗,提出我國對產(chǎn)品召回法律制度的完善措施。 第一部分,產(chǎn)品召回制度概述。本章首先對產(chǎn)品缺陷和產(chǎn)品召回的涵義進行了界定,然后從法哲學與經(jīng)濟學方面對產(chǎn)品召回制度的理論基礎進行了較深入的剖析,最后,將產(chǎn)品召回制度與商品的“三包”制度、強制回收制度進行了比較,更加詳細地了解產(chǎn)品召回制度。 第二部分,中美產(chǎn)品召回制度的比較。本章介紹了中美產(chǎn)品召回制度的立法現(xiàn)狀和價值理念,對比兩國在立法上的差異,揭示了產(chǎn)品召回制度深層次的立法理念。同時,對比了中美兩國產(chǎn)品召回制度中關于主體、召回對象、召回方式、法律責任等問題的不同內容。 第三部分,我國產(chǎn)品召回制度的完善。首先在我國現(xiàn)行法律法規(guī)的基礎上分析我國產(chǎn)品召回法律制度中存在的問題,然后對產(chǎn)品召回制度的必要性進行了詳細地剖析,進而借鑒美國先進的產(chǎn)品召回立法經(jīng)驗,分別從完善我國現(xiàn)有法律法規(guī)、制定專門的產(chǎn)品召回法及完善產(chǎn)品召回制度配套機制三方面做出詳細闡述,力圖完善我國的產(chǎn)品召回法律制度。
[Abstract]:With the development of commodity economy, the progress of science and technology and the attention paid to the protection of consumers' interests, the system of product recall has been developed step by step. It is an important symbol of the progress of legal system in modern market. The product recall system is based on the concept of more respect for human life and property and more attention to human rights. It reflects the legislative inclination to protect the rights and interests of consumers and respects human rights. The concrete manifestation of protecting human rights in economic relations. The United States is the first country in the world to establish a product recall system, the establishment of which begins with the recall of defective automobile products. At present, the United States is the world's most rapid development of product recall system, the most complete, the most representative of the country, its legislation and judicial practice of some developed countries in the West has a greater impact on the legislation of product recall system. After China's entry into WTO, international trade has increased, foreign goods have entered the Chinese market in large quantities, complaints and disputes about imported goods have gradually increased, and the cases of consumers taking manufacturers and dealers to court are frequently reported. In the face of foreign product defects, Chinese consumers are often not treated fairly compared with those in Europe and the United States. The reason is that our country lacks the perfect product recall system. At present, the understanding and legislation of product recall system in our country are in the primary stage. However, after decades of exploration and practice, the legal system and management system of product recall in the United States has been quite sound and complete. This paper, in this context, through the comparative study of the legal system of product recall between China and the United States, Further improve China's product recall system. In addition to the introduction and conclusions, this paper is divided into three parts. First of all, the related concepts, theoretical basis and the differences between the product recall system and other systems are discussed, and some legal issues of the product recall system in China and the United States are compared and analyzed. Then it discusses the deficiency and necessity of the product recall system in our country, and draws lessons from the advanced legislative experience of the United States, and puts forward some measures to perfect the legal system of product recall in our country. The first part is an overview of the product recall system. This chapter first defines the meaning of product defect and product recall, then analyzes the theoretical basis of product recall system from the aspects of legal philosophy and economics. This paper compares the product recall system with the "three guarantees" system and the compulsory recovery system to understand the product recall system in more detail. The second part, the comparison of product recall system between China and America. This chapter introduces the current legislative situation and the value concept of the product recall system in China and the United States, compares the legislative differences between the two countries, and reveals the deep-seated legislative ideas of the product recall system. At the same time, the different contents about the subject, recall object, recall method, legal liability and so on in the product recall system of China and the United States are compared. The third part, the consummation of the product recall system in our country. On the basis of the current laws and regulations of our country, the problems existing in the legal system of product recall in our country are analyzed, and then the necessity of the system of product recall is analyzed in detail, so as to draw lessons from the advanced legislative experience of product recall in the United States. From the aspects of perfecting the existing laws and regulations of our country, formulating the special product recall law and perfecting the supporting mechanism of the product recall system, the author tries to perfect the legal system of the product recall in our country.
【學位授予單位】：河北經(jīng)貿大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D923.8;D971.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 王利明;美國懲罰性賠償制度研究[J];比較法研究;2003年05期

2 鄒杰華;實行強制收回制度 堵住劣質產(chǎn)品源頭[J];商業(yè)研究;2003年10期

3 王利明;;關于完善我國缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度的若干問題[J];法學家;2008年02期

4 李學祥;美國產(chǎn)品召回制度及其啟示[J];工商行政管理;2005年05期

5 蔣辰昕;試論缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2004年01期

6 徐孟洲;王強;;構建產(chǎn)品召回制度的法律思考[J];經(jīng)濟法論壇;2004年00期

7 王賀洋;曹繁有;;論我國產(chǎn)品召回制度的完善[J];行政與法(吉林省行政學院學報);2005年12期

相關碩士學位論文 前8條

1 王繼新;中外產(chǎn)品責任法若干問題之比較研究[D];大連海事大學;2003年

2 覃嬰桃;缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度法律問題研究[D];西南政法大學;2005年

3 高梅梅;缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度研究[D];安徽大學;2006年

4 邱格磊;缺陷產(chǎn)品召回制度研究[D];廈門大學;2008年

5 趙江燕;缺陷產(chǎn)品召回法律制度研究[D];蘭州大學;2009年

6 李玉s，

本文編號：2046526