本文選題：多邊協(xié)定 + 實(shí)體內(nèi)容　； 參考：《環(huán)球法律評(píng)論》2014年02期

【摘要】：正編者按WTO"中國(guó)-原材料案"和"中國(guó)-稀土案"引起了國(guó)內(nèi)外法學(xué)界對(duì)于入世議定書的法律性質(zhì)和效力,特別是其與WTO多邊協(xié)定之間關(guān)系的深入思考和廣泛討論。與傳統(tǒng)條約法下加入條約基本上是一個(gè)程序性問(wèn)題、不涉及條約實(shí)體內(nèi)容不同,入世議定書為新加入成員創(chuàng)設(shè)了與WTO多邊協(xié)定的既有規(guī)則不盡吻合的權(quán)利和義務(wù)。應(yīng)當(dāng)如何理解這些權(quán)利和義務(wù),或者更確切地說(shuō),如何理解創(chuàng)設(shè)這些權(quán)利和義務(wù)的入世議定書相關(guān)條款?
[Abstract]:The "China-Raw material case" and "China-rare Earth case" have aroused deep thinking and extensive discussion on the legal nature and effect of the protocol of entry into WTO, especially on the relationship between WTO and multilateral agreements. Joining the treaty under the traditional treaty law is basically a procedural issue and does not involve the content of the treaty entity. The protocol of accession to the WTO creates rights and obligations which are inconsistent with the existing rules of the multilateral agreement of WTO for the new members to join the WTO. How should these rights and obligations be understood, or more precisely, the relevant provisions of the Protocol on accession that created them?
【分類號(hào)】：+

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李仲周;中國(guó)與關(guān)貿(mào)總協(xié)定[J];w蕓，

本文編號(hào)：2046558