本文選題：選擇 + 權(quán)利界定�。� 參考：《學(xué)術(shù)交流》2016年04期

【摘要】：科斯定理是關(guān)于權(quán)利界定的,然而定理中的"選擇"在很大程度上被科斯繼承者所忽視�？扑苟ɡ砟軌蛱岢鲋饕�?yàn)?損害具有相互性"這個(gè)新的分析角度,但相互性的本質(zhì)是稀缺資源配置問題,將權(quán)利沖突等價(jià)于相互性并以此分析權(quán)利配置,只會消解權(quán)利的多重屬性。科斯為權(quán)利界定的難題提供了一個(gè)有用的分析思路,但僅以財(cái)富最大化為準(zhǔn)據(jù)太冷酷、更非充分。法律人要想正確理解科斯,必須重視"企業(yè)的性質(zhì)"所提出的方法。
[Abstract]:Coase Theorem is about the definition of right, but the choice in the theorem is largely ignored by the successor of Coase. Coase Theorem is able to put forward a new analytical angle mainly because of the reciprocity of damage, but the essence of reciprocity is the problem of allocation of scarce resources, which equates the conflict of rights with reciprocity and analyzes the allocation of rights. It will only dispel the multiple attributes of power. Coase provides a useful analytical approach to the problem of defining rights, but it is too cold, much less sufficient, to maximize wealth. In order to understand Coase correctly, the legal person must attach importance to the method of "the Nature of Enterprise".
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D90-05

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 黃國洋;;《物權(quán)法》實(shí)施背景下基于權(quán)利界定的“控規(guī)五線”控制探討[J];規(guī)劃師;2009年02期

2 廖鑫彬;;論商業(yè)拆遷中的權(quán)利規(guī)則[J];四川教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年11期

3 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號：1820072