本文選題：反傾銷預警機制 + 單獨稅率��； 參考：《西南政法大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：2003年美國對華木制家具發(fā)起的反傾銷調(diào)查案是我國木制家具出口企業(yè)遭遇到的涉案金額最大,波及企業(yè)最多的一起案件。該案在立案之初的涉案金額就達到了近10億美元,涉案企業(yè)更是達到上萬家。除此之外,該案的另外一個重要特點就是從立案調(diào)查到最終裁決這一過程幾乎涉及到了反傾銷案件所能涉及的所有主要問題。 創(chuàng)作本文的目的是一方面通過對該案的整體了解與宏觀把握,總結出以美國為代表的外國政府在對中國企業(yè)發(fā)起反傾銷調(diào)查時所需經(jīng)歷的程序和步驟;另一方面通過對該案重點環(huán)節(jié)的分析,得出美國商務部在認定反傾銷主要問題上的立場和裁決標準。在經(jīng)過以上兩個方面的把握后,達到促進我國企業(yè)、企業(yè)協(xié)會應訴能力的目的,使我國出口企業(yè)在今后的對外貿(mào)易中做到心中有數(shù),知己知彼。 由于本文為案例分析,所以文章綜合采用了類比推理法、抽象概括法、綜合分析法和文獻研究法等多種研究方法。在對國內(nèi)外相關資料進行對比分析的基礎上,筆者吸收借鑒了自認為可以對反傾銷法律實務起到積極作用的看法和觀點,再加之以本人對這些觀點的理解和評論,最終形成了此文。 本文在內(nèi)容上分為五個部分,具體表現(xiàn)如下: 第一部分為案情介紹,這一部分是以時間為主線,以美國商務部做出的裁決結果為主要內(nèi)容,主要包括從商務部接到立案申請到作出行政復審終裁這段時間的重要裁決。通過對本案主要裁決的陳述,達到在整體上把握案件始末的目的。 第二部分介紹了美國商務部對本案主要爭議問題的認定以及做出這些裁決的依據(jù)。這一部分的內(nèi)容主要圍繞著市場經(jīng)濟國家問題、市場導向產(chǎn)業(yè)問題、單獨稅率問題和替代國選擇問題展開,通過這一部分的內(nèi)容,分析出本案主要爭議問題的焦點所在以及商務部的裁決標準。 第三部分著重從我國應訴企業(yè)方面進行論述,一方面對我國家具企業(yè)在本案中的成功經(jīng)驗進行總結,另一方面對這些企業(yè)在案件中表現(xiàn)出的不足進行歸納并提出了一些粗淺的完善建議。在企業(yè)成功經(jīng)驗方面,本文主要以企業(yè)的產(chǎn)權制度和財務制度、企業(yè)聯(lián)合進口國力量,形成強大統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線、替代國研究這三方面為中心;在企業(yè)的不足方面,本文主要以建立企業(yè)層面的反傾銷預警機制、果斷應訴、積極配合調(diào)查、單獨稅率等方面進行展開。 第四部分以我國政府為切入點,綜合評價我國政府在在應對反傾銷調(diào)查時的出色表現(xiàn)和不足之處,并對不足方面提出了一些完善措施,這部分內(nèi)容主要圍繞著“非市場經(jīng)濟地位”問題的解決、國家層面的反傾銷應訴基金機制和貿(mào)易報復措施展開。 第五部分總結了我國家具行業(yè)協(xié)會在此次反傾銷訴訟中的積極作用和缺陷所在,并針對這些欠缺方面提出了一些應對策略,該部分主要圍繞企業(yè)協(xié)會層面的預警機制、應訴基金、加強企業(yè)培訓、協(xié)調(diào)出口價格等方面展開分析。
[Abstract]:The anti-dumping investigation launched by American wooden furniture in China in 2003 is the largest amount involved in the case of wooden furniture export enterprises in China. The case has reached nearly 1 billion dollars at the beginning of the case, and the enterprises involved in the case have reached tens of thousands. In addition, another important feature of the case is the case. That is, from the filing investigation to the final ruling process, almost all major problems that can be covered by anti-dumping cases are involved.
On the one hand, the purpose of this article is to summarize the procedures and steps required by the United States as the representative of the foreign government to initiate anti-dumping investigations on Chinese enterprises, on the one hand, and through the analysis of the key links of the case, on the other hand, the United States Department of commerce has found that the main issues of anti-dumping are identified. After the grasp of the above two aspects, we can achieve the purpose of promoting the ability of our enterprises and enterprise associations to appeal, so as to make our export enterprises have a good idea in the future of foreign trade.
Because this article is a case analysis, the article adopts a variety of research methods, such as analogy reasoning, abstract generalization, comprehensive analysis and literature research. On the basis of comparison and analysis of relevant information at home and abroad, the author absorbs the views and views that can play an active role in the practice of anti dumping law. Coupled with my understanding and comments on these views, I finally formed this article.
This article is divided into five parts in content:
The first part is the introduction of the case. This part is based on the time as the main line. The main content is the result of the decision made by the Department of Commerce of the United States. It mainly includes the important verdict from the Department of Commerce to the end of the administrative retrial from the Ministry of commerce to the final judgment of the end of the administrative retrial.
The second part introduces the identification and basis of the main disputes of the case by the Department of Commerce of the United States, which mainly focuses on the problems of the market economy, the market oriented industry, the individual tax rate and the choice of the alternative country. Through the content of this part, the main disputes are analyzed. The focus of the question and the standards of the Department of Commerce.
The third part focuses on the discussion of the enterprises in our country. On the one hand, it summarizes the successful experience of our furniture enterprises in this case, on the other hand, sums up the shortcomings of these enterprises in the cases and puts forward some rough suggestions. In the experience of enterprise achievement, this article mainly takes the property right system of the enterprise. Degree and financial system, enterprises combined with the strength of importing countries, forming a strong United Front, the research of the three aspects as the center of the country; in the shortage of enterprises, this article is mainly to establish an anti-dumping early warning mechanism at the enterprise level, resolutely answer the lawsuit, actively cooperate with the investigation, and separate tax rate and other aspects.
The fourth part, taking our government as the breakthrough point, comprehensively evaluate the outstanding performance and shortcomings of our government in dealing with the anti-dumping investigation, and put forward some perfect measures. This part mainly focuses on the solution of the "non market economic status", the anti dumping response fund mechanism and trade newspaper at the national level. The complex measures are carried out.
The fifth part summarizes the positive role and defects of China's furniture industry association in this anti-dumping lawsuit, and puts forward some countermeasures against these deficiencies. This part mainly focuses on the early warning mechanism of the enterprise association level, the response fund, the strengthening of enterprise training, and the coordination of export prices.

【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D971.2;D922.29;F752.02

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前6條

1 余暉;WTO體制下行業(yè)協(xié)會的應對策略——以反傾銷為例[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2002年03期

2 William Perry,樊飛華 ,許肖冰;關鍵在于積極應訴——從美國對華反傾銷案中獲得的啟示[J];國際貿(mào)易;2000年11期

3 趙瑾;特殊待遇——美國對華應用“非市場經(jīng)濟條款”對中美經(jīng)貿(mào)關系的影響[J];國際貿(mào)易;2004年07期

4 鐘偉;難畢其功于一役——對中國“市場經(jīng)濟地位”的反思[J];國際貿(mào)易;2004年07期

5 江小涓;中國市場經(jīng)濟地位與企業(yè)競爭力[J];連鎖與特許;2004年12期

6 宋泓;非市場經(jīng)濟地位與我國對外貿(mào)易的發(fā)展[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治;2004年10期

，

本文編號：1810548