本文關(guān)鍵詞：憲政的實質(zhì)及其施行路徑——基于《獨立評論文選》“憲政觀”的分析　出處：《寧夏師范學院學報》2016年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 依憲執(zhí)政 憲政 民治 獨立評論

【摘要】：《中共中央關(guān)于全面推進依法治國若干重大問題的決定》明確提出"堅持依法治國首先要堅持以憲治國,堅持依法執(zhí)政首先要堅持依憲執(zhí)政。"為樹立憲法權(quán)威,健全憲法實施機制,提供了制度上的保障。但學界對"依憲執(zhí)政"與"憲政"的關(guān)系仍存有分歧,對憲政的施行路徑,也未有共識性的認知。謝泳先生選編的《獨立評論文選》,以創(chuàng)刊于1932年的《獨立評論》為底本,內(nèi)容涉及政治憲政、教育民生、時事大事等方面。彼時知識精英對憲政的探索,未必都適用于當下,但他們對憲政的共識,即憲政就是一種政治生活的習慣,卻可以為我們理解憲政提供一種新的視角。
[Abstract]:< > decision of the CPC Central Committee on promoting a number of major issues of rule of law put forward clearly "adhere to the rule of law must first adhere to the constitution, uphold the law governing should adhere to rule by constitution." to establish the authority of the constitution, perfect the constitution implementation mechanism, system provides security. But the academic circles of the relationship between "ruling by constitution" and "constitutional" there is disagreement on the implementation of the constitutional path, no consensus of cognition. Selected Mr. Xie Yong "independent essays", founded in 1932 to "independent review" as dibon, covering political constitutionalism, the people's livelihood education, current event and so on. Then the intellectual elite of constitutionalism the exploration, not for the moment, but they are on the constitutional consensus, namely constitutionalism is a kind of political life habit, but can understand the constitutional provides a new perspective for us.

【作者單位】： 寧夏師范學院政治與歷史學院;
【分類號】：D920.0
【正文快照】： 依憲治國,依憲執(zhí)政已經(jīng)由黨和國家明確提出,但學界對“依憲執(zhí)政”究竟是不是“憲政”還存有分歧,產(chǎn)生分歧的主要原因在于學者對憲政的實質(zhì)有不同的認知,存在憲政姓“社”姓“資”之爭。這種不同的認知,也體現(xiàn)在憲政施行路徑的主張上:走中國特色的憲政還是全然西方式的憲政。謝，

本文編號：1401204