【摘要】：目的：采用單盲隨機對照實驗的方法,把納入病例分為穴位組(穴位針刺+艾司唑侖)和非穴位組(非穴位針刺+艾司唑侖),評估針刺結合艾司唑侖治療肝火擾心型原發(fā)性失眠的療效同時找出針刺穴位對比非穴位的療效差異為針刺臨床研究中安慰療法的設計提供參考依據(jù)。并探討這種療效的產(chǎn)生與心理指標SAS、SDS評分改善的相關性。方法：1本次研究共納入68例患者,來自廣東省中醫(yī)院大德路總院傳統(tǒng)療法科均符合納入標準。運用SAS統(tǒng)計軟件采用分層、區(qū)組隨機的方法,按病例分配數(shù)及兩組1：1的隨機比例生成隨機數(shù)字分組表進行隨機分組。采用單盲隨機對照試驗的方法把病例分為穴位組(穴位針刺+艾司唑侖)、非穴位組(非穴位針刺十艾司唑侖)。2、治療方法：穴位組(穴位針刺+艾司唑侖)：每日針刺穴位一次同時睡前給予1粒艾司唑侖；非穴位組(非穴位針刺+艾司唑侖)：每日針刺非穴位一次同時睡前給予1粒艾司唑侖。兩組治療時間均為4周。3、療效判定標準：治療前后均進行主要指標PSQI(匹茲堡睡眠質量)量表,次要指標SAS(焦慮自評)量表、SDS(抑郁自評)量表評價。4、復發(fā)率評價：治療結束后第2周、第4周進行隨訪,若隨訪時點的PSQI量表總評分〉療程結束時的分值,視為復發(fā),并進行X2檢驗及Kaplan-Meier生存曲線分析。5、PSQI和相關心理指標相關性分析：應用Spearman相關計算分析心理指標SDS、SAS量表和PSQI評分及其治療前后差值間的相關性。6、安全性比較：記錄每組治療期間出現(xiàn)的白天嗜睡、頭暈、頭痛等不適現(xiàn)象。結果：1 療效比較：1.1 總有效率穴位組總有效率95.2%,非穴位組總有效率90.0%。穴位組優(yōu)于非穴位組,經(jīng)X2檢驗穴位組和非穴位組相比差異有統(tǒng)計學意義。1.2 PSQI量表1.2.1 組內(nèi)比較：治療4周后穴位組、非穴位組PSQI總評分與治療前相比均有顯著改善。治療4周后穴位組PSQI評分中日間功能評分較治療前有顯著改善。非穴位組日間功能評分較治療前雖有降低但差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(P＞0.05)。1.2.2 組間比較：治療4周后PSQI量表總評分穴位組顯著低于非穴位組。治療4周后PSQI量表中日間功能評分穴位組顯著低于非穴位組。1.2.3 組間差值比較治療4周前后PSQI總評分差值穴位組和非穴位組相比較高,且差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義。治療4周前后日間功能評分差值穴位組和非穴位組相比較高,且差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義。1.3 心理指標(SAS量表、SDS量表)：1.3.1 組內(nèi)對比治療4周后,穴位組SAS評分較治療前顯著降低,非穴位組較治療前雖降低但差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。兩組SDS總評分與治療前相比均無顯著改善(P0.05)。1.3.2 組間對比治療4周后兩組SDS、SAS總評分兩兩比較差異無統(tǒng)計學意義。2 復發(fā)情況比較：經(jīng)X2分析及Kaplan-Meier檢驗,治療結束后第2周隨訪兩組相比差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(P＞0.05)。治療結束后第4周隨訪穴位組和非穴位組相比復發(fā)風險較低且差異有統(tǒng)計學意義。3心理指標和PSQI量表及其療效相關性分析治療前抑郁自評量表(SDS)、焦慮自評量表(SAS)和睡眠質量量表(PSQI)之間呈顯著正相關性,抑郁自評量表(SDS)和PSQI評分無顯著相關性(P0.05)。PSQI總分的改善和SAS評分的改善呈顯著正相關。4 安全性比較：治療期間穴位組1例患者出現(xiàn)輕度頭暈、嗜睡；非穴位組2例患者出現(xiàn)治療后服藥后輕度頭暈、嗜睡伴胃腸道不適,兩組比較差異無統(tǒng)計學意義。對上述患者進行肝腎常規(guī)、血分析等檢查后無明顯異常,未發(fā)現(xiàn)與藥物有關和可能有關的嚴重不良反應,病人全身和局部耐受性好。結論：1 穴位組在改善睡眠質量及日間功能障礙方面優(yōu)于非穴位組；在減少復發(fā)率方面也優(yōu)于非穴位組。2 睡眠質量的改善與患者心理狀況密切相關,兩組睡眠質量的改善和焦慮傾程度的減輕有顯著相關性,和抑郁程度的改善無顯著相關性。
[Abstract]:Objective: The method of single-blind randomized controlled trial was used to divide the cases into the acupuncture point group (the acupuncture points of the acupuncture points of the acupuncture points) and the non-acupuncture point group (the non-acupuncture point acupuncture + eisphalan). To evaluate the effect of acupuncture on the treatment of primary insomnia of the heart-fire-disturbed heart-type primary insomnia, it is found that the difference of the curative effect of the acupuncture points on the non-acupuncture points is the reference for the design of the comfort therapy in the clinical study of acupuncture. The correlation between the results of this effect and the improvement of the psychological index SAS and SDS score was also discussed. Methods: A total of 68 patients were included in this study, from the traditional therapy section of the Dade Road General Hospital in the middle hospital of Guangdong Province. Using SAS statistical software, the random data packet table was randomly divided according to the number of cases and the random proportion of 1: 1 of the two groups. A single-blind randomized controlled trial was used to divide the cases into the acupuncture point group (the acupuncture points of the acupuncture points of the acupuncture points), and the non-acupuncture point group (the non-acupuncture point acupuncture + eisphalan). 2. The treatment method: the acupuncture point group (the acupuncture point acupuncture at the acupuncture point + elisphalan): The acupuncture points of each day and the acupuncture point of the acupuncture point were given 1 eesecilun in the same time, and the non-acupuncture point group (non-acupuncture point acupuncture + eisphalan): once daily acupuncture and non-acupuncture points, the acupuncture points were given 1 eesecilun before and after the same time. The treatment time of the two groups was 4 weeks. 3. The criteria for efficacy determination: the primary indexes PSQI (Pittsburgh sleep quality) scale, the secondary index SAS (anxiety self-evaluation) scale, the SDS (depression self-evaluation) scale and the recurrence rate evaluation were performed before and after the treatment. 4. The recurrence rate evaluation: the second week after the end of the treatment, Follow-up at week 4, if the score of the PSQI scale at the time of follow-up> the score at the end of the course of treatment is considered to be a recurrence, and the X2 test and the Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis are performed. 5, PSQI and related psychometric correlation analysis: Spearman-related calculation and analysis of the psychological index SDS, The correlation between the SAS scale and the PSQI score and the difference between the pre-and post-treatment differences. 6. Comparison of safety: Record daytime sleepiness, dizziness, headache and other discomfort during each group of treatment. Results: 1. The total effective rate of the 1. 1 total effective acupoint group was 95.2%, and the total effective rate of the non-acupuncture point group was 90.0%. Compared with the non-acupuncture point group, the point group was better than that of the non-acupuncture point group. Compared with the non-acupuncture point group, the group of the acupoint group and the non-acupuncture point group had a statistically significant difference compared with that of the non-acupuncture point group. The score of the day function in the PSQI score of the acupoint group after 4 weeks of treatment was significantly improved before the treatment. The scores of the day function of the non-acupuncture point group were lower than that before treatment (P> 0.05). The comparison between the two groups: The total score of the PSQI scale after 4 weeks of treatment was significantly lower than that of the non-acupuncture point group. in that PSQI scale, the mean score of the day function score in the PSQI scale was significantly lower than that of the non-acupuncture point group. The results showed that after 4 weeks, the SAS score of the acupuncture point group was significantly lower than that before the treatment for 4 weeks after the treatment for 4 weeks after the treatment for 4 weeks. The non-acupuncture point group was lower than that before treatment (P0.05). There was no significant improvement in the total scores of SDS in the two groups (P0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups after the end of treatment (P> 0.05). in that follow-up of the 4-week follow-up group and the non-acupuncture point group, the risk of recurrence was low and the difference was statistically significant. There was a significant positive correlation between the anxiety self-rating scale (SAS) and the sleep quality scale (PSQI), and there was no significant correlation between the self-rating scale (SDS) and the PSQI score (P0.05). The improvement of the total score of PSQI and the improvement of the SAS score were positively correlated. There were mild dizziness and somnolence in one patient in the acupuncture point group during the treatment period, and 2 patients with non-acupuncture point group had mild dizziness, lethargy and gastrointestinal discomfort after treatment, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The above-mentioned patients had no obvious abnormality after the examination of the liver and kidney, blood analysis, etc., and no serious adverse reactions related to the drug and possibly related were found, and the whole body and the local tolerance of the patient were good. Conclusion: 1 point group is superior to non-acupuncture point group in improving sleep quality and day function, and it is also superior to non-acupuncture point group in reducing the recurrence rate. The improvement of sleep quality is closely related to the psychological condition of the patient, and the improvement of the sleep quality and the reduction of the degree of anxiety of the two groups have a significant correlation. and there was no significant correlation between the degree of depression and the degree of depression.
【學位授予單位】：廣州中醫(yī)藥大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：R246.6

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 喻鳳蘭,趙榮征,孫學東,孔鄂生,任恕;應用精密測溫儀測定穴位與非穴位溫度的探討[J];同濟醫(yī)科大學學報;1990年03期

2 王寶琦;穴位按壓配合針刺治療急性腹痛觀察[J];中國民間療法;1995年04期

3 黃杰,歐陽嵐;穴位毫米波輻射與穴位針刺治療顳下頜關節(jié)紊亂病76例[J];中國臨床康復;2002年20期

4 嚴振國,白娟,邵水金,張建華;危險穴位針刺深度與角度的研究[J];中國針灸;2004年11期

5 高文斌 ,徐波 ,杜敏 ,王懷瑾 ,尹良偉;穴位針刺注射地塞米松預防化療藥物致骨髓抑制的臨床觀察[J];臨床腫瘤學雜志;2005年03期

6 張建國;應用復雜科學理論對穴位進行實驗研究和定量計算[J];醫(yī)學與哲學;2005年08期

7 胡建群;陸曉婕;葉新華;范伯強;陸美萍;俞明;;穴位針刺治療喉部慢性炎癥的彩色多普勒血流顯像觀察[J];中華超聲影像學雜志;2006年03期

8 李巍;譚洛;于波;李普海;陳健;孫育賢;;氦—氖激光穴位針刺治療高脂血癥臨床研究[J];針灸臨床雜志;2008年08期

9 張曉霞;鄭倩茹;趙凌;;針刺治療中風后呃逆的穴位配伍[J];四川中醫(yī);2013年07期

10 周海濤;;中醫(yī)膝關節(jié)穴位針刺配合手法對人工膝關節(jié)置換術后康復的影響[J];世界中醫(yī)藥;2013年10期

相關會議論文 前8條

1 劉斌;申琴;;穴位用藥與生物全息效應[A];全國中西醫(yī)結合教育學術研討會論文集[C];2000年

2 徐書君;符文彬;梁兆暉;;針刺治療頸椎病頸痛的穴位特異性臨床試驗[A];廣東省針灸學會第十二次學術研討會暨全國腦卒中及脊柱相關性疾病非藥物診療技術培訓班論文集[C];2011年

3 白愛蓮;馮霞;;針刺手足穴位中西醫(yī)結合搶救重癥患兒的體會[A];中國特種針法應用與針灸臨床學術交流大會論文集[C];2000年

4 王惠敏;王蘭蘭;;脊針穴位針刺治療腰腹部病癥625例療效分析[A];中國針灸學會第六屆全國中青年針灸推拿學術交流暨針灸學科發(fā)展與建設研討會論文匯編[C];2004年

5 馬紅利;孫立虹;;眼周穴位針刺手法簡介[A];第十屆全國中西醫(yī)結合眼科學術會議暨第五屆海峽眼科學術交流會論文匯編[C];2011年

6 盧君艷;蔣松鶴;鄭余銀;李勁民;郝赤子;;不同穴位針刺結合康復訓練對偏癱患者肌痙攣的影響[A];2011浙江省針灸學會年會暨學術交流會論文匯編[C];2011年

7 張澤全;;手針療法[A];中醫(yī)藥學術發(fā)展大會論文集[C];2005年

8 李小軍;;砭石療法與穴位針刺治療失眠癥的對比研究[A];中國針灸學會砭石與刮痧專業(yè)委員會年會論文集[C];2014年

相關重要報紙文章 前5條

1 傅云祥;穴位植藥祛風濕[N];健康報;2008年

2 本版撰文 李佳慶 王愛華;小小銀針祛大病[N];健康時報;2003年

3 黑龍江省大慶油田總醫(yī)院 沈中秋 衣曉峰 李華妍 整理;為遺尿患兒擰緊“閥門”[N];健康報;2011年

4 時仲省 高思敏 溫廷勇;針藥結合治結石[N];中國醫(yī)藥報;2000年

5 上海曙光醫(yī)院寶山分院腎內(nèi)科 孫成力;內(nèi)關穴改善心絞痛、心律失常[N];上海中醫(yī)藥報;2014年

相關博士學位論文 前7條

1 陳澤斌;穴位針刺預處理抗大鼠腦缺血再灌注損傷作用及其機制的研究[D];湖北中醫(yī)學院;2003年

2 顏培宇;不同穴位針刺對免疫抑制大鼠神經(jīng)肽相關基因表達及免疫調(diào)節(jié)作用的分子機制研究[D];黑龍江中醫(yī)藥大學;2010年

3 張俊海;電針鎮(zhèn)痛的腦功能磁共振初步研究[D];復旦大學;2005年

4 姜慶軍;穴位針刺的腦功能磁共振成像：真穴、假穴和觸覺刺激的對照研究[D];第二軍醫(yī)大學;2006年

5 黃偉;超早期針刺對急性腦缺血大鼠能量代謝的影響及其機制研究[D];湖北中醫(yī)藥大學;2010年

6 任曉暄;電針不同穴位對實驗性類痛經(jīng)大鼠鎮(zhèn)痛效應及其機理的研究[D];中國中醫(yī)科學院;2010年

7 溫秀云;針刺治療絕經(jīng)過渡期絕經(jīng)相關癥狀的臨床研究[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學;2015年

相關碩士學位論文 前10條

1 靳蕊;膽囊疾病相關穴位數(shù)字化測量的研究[D];河北聯(lián)合大學;2014年

2 李松;低頻穴位電刺激改善中風后腕背伸功能即刻效應的研究[D];黑龍江中醫(yī)藥大學;2016年

3 張徐雯;穴位與非穴位對比治療肝火擾心型原發(fā)性失眠的臨床研究[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學;2016年

4 鄧紅妹;穴位與非穴位針刺治療慢性頸痛的臨床研究[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學;2016年

5 嚴曉霞;穴位真刺與假刺治療慢性頸痛的臨床研究[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學;2016年

6 和婧偉;大鼠不同部位穴位的形態(tài)學觀察[D];中國中醫(yī)科學院;2006年

7 丁玉龍;電針中毼治療良性前列腺增生癥穴位特異性的研究[D];中國中醫(yī)科學院;2011年

8 康建華;不同電針頻率和穴位對膀胱逼尿肌功能的干預效應規(guī)律研究[D];福建中醫(yī)藥大學;2010年

9 楊聯(lián)勝;穴位電磁療治療急性期特發(fā)性面神經(jīng)麻痹的隨機對照研究[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學;2012年

10 浦婧婧;利用數(shù)據(jù)挖掘方法探討針灸治療多囊卵巢綜合征相關穴位的研究[D];黑龍江中醫(yī)藥大學;2012年

，

本文編號：2324129