【摘要】：筆者通過問卷調(diào)查、訪談和案例分析,對“對泰漢語有效課堂教學(xué)行為”進(jìn)行了調(diào)查研究,調(diào)查對象為赴泰漢語教師志愿者和泰國中學(xué)生。寫作此文的目的在于了解師生雙方對漢語課堂教學(xué)行為的評價(jià)怎么樣,師生之間的看法有沒有出現(xiàn)顯著性的差別,具體表現(xiàn)在哪幾個(gè)方面?然后,根據(jù)教學(xué)實(shí)踐和教學(xué)理論提出嘗試性的建議和解決辦法,希望為今后的赴泰漢語教師志愿者提供教學(xué)參考,從而提高漢語課堂教學(xué)的效率和質(zhì)量。本文參考了王艷(2004)和曹賢文、王智(2010)的問卷內(nèi)容,根據(jù)研究對象的實(shí)際情況對問卷進(jìn)行了適當(dāng)?shù)恼{(diào)整和修改。筆者采用SPSS軟件對師生兩組數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行了統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,通過計(jì)算平均值和獨(dú)立樣本T檢驗(yàn),發(fā)現(xiàn)教師組和學(xué)生組在20項(xiàng)課堂教學(xué)行為的評價(jià)上表現(xiàn)出一定的一致性,但是在涉及錯(cuò)誤糾正、提問方式、學(xué)習(xí)評估、教學(xué)語言和教學(xué)方法等方面的教學(xué)行為上存在著顯著性差異。比對“對泰漢語有效課堂教學(xué)行為”顯著性差異的檢測結(jié)果,筆者對參與問卷調(diào)查的漢語教師志愿者進(jìn)行了訪談,從中選取出具有代表性的教學(xué)案例加以分析研究。本文所列舉的案例均來自于真實(shí)的泰國漢語課堂,集中反映了師生雙方在教學(xué)語言、教學(xué)方式和錯(cuò)誤糾正這三類課堂教學(xué)行為上的差異。筆者對案例中存在的問題進(jìn)行了深入分析,并提出了解決策略,對課堂教學(xué)實(shí)踐有一定的指導(dǎo)意義和參考價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:Through questionnaire investigation, interview and case analysis, the author investigates and studies the effective classroom teaching behavior of Thai Chinese. The object of the investigation is volunteers of Chinese teachers in Thailand and middle school students in Thailand. The purpose of writing this article is to understand how both teachers and students evaluate the Chinese classroom teaching behavior, whether there is a significant difference between teachers and students, in which aspects? Then, according to the teaching practice and teaching theory, this paper puts forward some tentative suggestions and solutions, hoping to provide teaching reference for Chinese teacher volunteers in Thailand in the future, so as to improve the efficiency and quality of Chinese classroom teaching. This paper refers to the contents of Wang Yan (2004), Cao Xianwen and Wang Zhi (2010), and adapts and modifies the questionnaire according to the actual situation of the subjects studied. The author used SPSS software to analyze the data of two groups of teachers and students. By calculating the average value and independent sample T test, the author found that the teacher group and the student group showed a certain consistency in the evaluation of 20 classroom teaching behaviors. However, there are significant differences in teaching behavior involving error correction, way of questioning, learning evaluation, teaching language and teaching method. Compared with the test results of the significant difference in the effective classroom teaching behavior of Thai Chinese, the author interviewed the Chinese teacher volunteers who participated in the questionnaire survey, and selected representative teaching cases to analyze and study. All the cases cited in this paper come from the real Thai Chinese classroom, which reflects the differences between teachers and students in language of instruction, teaching method and error correction in these three kinds of classroom teaching behavior. The author makes a thorough analysis of the problems existing in the case, and puts forward the solution strategy, which has certain guiding significance and reference value to the classroom teaching practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G633.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 余文森;;有效教學(xué)三大內(nèi)涵及其意義[J];中國教育學(xué)刊;2012年05期

2 黃曉穎;;漢語國際推廣背景下的有效教學(xué)[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2011年05期

3 曹賢文;王智;;對外漢語教師與歐美留學(xué)生對“有效教師行為”的評價(jià)[J];語言教學(xué)與研究;2010年06期

4 田艷;;關(guān)于對外漢語課堂糾錯(cuò)策略的層次性選擇[J];語言教學(xué)與研究;2010年03期

5 彭小川;馬煜逵;;漢語作為第二語言詞匯教學(xué)應(yīng)有的意識與策略[J];語言文字應(yīng)用;2010年01期

6 溫曉虹;;教學(xué)輸入與學(xué)習(xí)者的語言輸出[J];世界漢語教學(xué);2007年03期

7 鐘啟泉;;“有效教學(xué)”研究的價(jià)值[J];教育研究;2007年06期

8 徐彩華;程偉民;;對外漢語教師自我教學(xué)效能感研究初探[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);2007年02期

9 丁安琪;;關(guān)于日本本科留學(xué)生對漢語課堂活動有效性評價(jià)的分析——對外漢語課堂活動系列調(diào)查之四[J];世界漢語教學(xué);2007年01期

10 丁安琪;;歐美留學(xué)生對課堂活動有效性評價(jià)的分析——對外漢語課堂活動系列調(diào)查之三[J];漢語學(xué)習(xí);2006年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 姚利民;有效教學(xué)研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：2467152