教師書面糾正性反饋對(duì)高中生、高職生英文寫作錯(cuò)誤影響的對(duì)比研究
[Abstract]:In English learning, students' writing ability is an important embodiment of comprehensive language expression. However, students often make more or less mistakes in the process of English writing. Through the research of teachers' written corrective feedback, this paper discusses whether it can reduce students' English writing errors, and if they can, which kind of errors can be reduced more effectively for high school students and vocational students under which kind of corrective feedback. First, through the questionnaire survey, from the attitude view, the error correction demand, the way demand and the effective degree and so on dimension, understands the Nanjing Gaochun high school and the Nanjing engineering higher vocational school student's overall writing present situation. Then, an experiment is carried out on each class of 2015 of Nanjing Gaochun High School and Nanjing higher Vocational School. Students in each class were divided into three groups: direct feedback group, indirect tagging feedback group and indirect underlined feedback group. Using Carl James's error classification method for reference, students' English writing errors are classified into ontology errors, lexical errors, grammatical errors and textual errors, and the quantitative statistics of English writing errors are carried out. Finally, using EXCEL and SPSS19.0 software, the author makes a comparative analysis of all kinds of writing errors in high school students and vocational college students before and after testing. Based on the relevant theories of psychology, such as "reinforcement" and "attention", the questionnaire data and experimental data are analyzed and discussed. The results show that: (1) Direct feedback contributes to the reduction of English writing among senior high school students. Two kinds of indirect feedback contribute to the reduction of English writing errors of vocational college students; (2) Noumenon errors and textual errors are the most easily corrected ones. Considering the teachers' time and energy and the students' attention, indirect underlined feedback is the best. (3) the lexical errors have no significant improvement in the three ways of feedback. Further research is needed. It is hoped that the results of this paper will be helpful to the English teaching of English teachers as well as to the English writing of senior high school students and vocational students.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:H319.3;G633.41
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 樊永美;;國內(nèi)二語寫作書面糾正性反饋研究述評(píng)[J];瘋狂英語(教師版);2015年01期
2 蘇建紅;;認(rèn)知因素、注意與書面糾正性反饋效果[J];西安外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期
3 姜琳;陳錦;;書面糾正性反饋與二語習(xí)得——針對(duì)英語類指名詞短語用法的實(shí)證研究[J];當(dāng)代外語研究;2013年11期
4 楊麗娟;楊曼君;張陽;;我國英語寫作教學(xué)三種反饋方式的對(duì)比研究[J];外語教學(xué);2013年03期
5 李競(jìng);;英語寫作教學(xué)中教師書面反饋效果的案例研究[J];外語界;2013年02期
6 陳曉湘;彭麗娜;郭興榮;張姣;劉星;;聚焦和非聚焦書面反饋對(duì)英語非真實(shí)條件虛擬語氣習(xí)得的影響[J];外語與外語教學(xué);2013年02期
7 于書林;;教師反饋與同伴反饋——社會(huì)文化活動(dòng)理論視角下的差異與融合[J];現(xiàn)代外語;2013年01期
8 胡俊;;大學(xué)生英語應(yīng)用文寫作錯(cuò)誤類型與教師的反饋方式探討[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年01期
9 李競(jìng);;中國學(xué)生英語寫作中教師書面反饋特征與學(xué)生反應(yīng)的案例研究[J];外語界;2011年06期
10 蔣霞;曾路;;大學(xué)英語教師書面反饋?zhàn)鳂I(yè)行為的效率——新視角下的實(shí)證研究[J];山東外語教學(xué);2011年04期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 王珊珊;高中生英語寫作中母語負(fù)遷移問題及其矯正策略研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2014年
2 金香花;中國朝鮮族大學(xué)生英語寫作中動(dòng)詞錯(cuò)誤分析[D];延邊大學(xué);2010年
3 李家遠(yuǎn);教師“親和力”和教育教學(xué)效果有效性的研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年
,本文編號(hào):2358606
本文鏈接:http://www.sikaile.net/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2358606.html