孟子責(zé)善論面臨的合理性挑戰(zhàn)
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-12-21 07:43
【摘要】：圍繞孟子的責(zé)善論,后世學(xué)者既有辯護(hù)、傳承、創(chuàng)新和發(fā)展,也有批評(píng)、責(zé)難。作為處理父子這一特殊人際關(guān)系的學(xué)說(shuō),孟子的責(zé)善論自古以來(lái)引起了長(zhǎng)久而又廣泛的爭(zhēng)議和駁難,面臨三種合理性挑戰(zhàn):一是己他關(guān)系向度的合理性挑戰(zhàn),孟子說(shuō)的"古者易子而教"并不像他所擔(dān)憂(yōu)的那樣一定會(huì)造成雙方關(guān)系惡化;二是血親倫理向度的合理性挑戰(zhàn),孟子"父子之間不責(zé)善"的理念與儒家一貫主張的諫親理念難以融洽,導(dǎo)致血緣親情與道德理性難以統(tǒng)一、親情倫理與社會(huì)倫理難以統(tǒng)一;三是孟子的"父子之間不責(zé)善"理念因擔(dān)心直諫、義諍和厲言會(huì)損害父子仁愛(ài)親情走向拒絕"父子責(zé)善",這與他的仁宅義路觀念、與仁義禮智"四德"為人的類(lèi)特質(zhì)思想相沖突。
[Abstract]:Around Mencius' theory of responsibility and goodness, scholars of later generations have not only defense, inheritance, innovation and development, but also criticism and criticism. As the theory of dealing with the special interpersonal relationship between father and son, Mencius' theory of responsibility and goodness has caused a long and widespread controversy and refutation since ancient times, which faces three kinds of reasonable challenges: first, the reasonable challenge of the dimension of self-other relationship. Mencius said that "the ancient man changed and taught" does not necessarily cause the deterioration of bilateral relations as he feared; Second, the rationality challenge of blood kinship ethics, Mencius' idea of "not being responsible for kindness between father and son" and the concept of remonstrating kinship advocated by Confucianism are difficult to get in harmony, which leads to the difficulty of unifying blood kinship and moral rationality, and the unity of kinship ethics and social ethics. Third, Mencius'"responsibility between father and son" concept is worried about direct remonstrance, justice and harsh words will damage the father and son love and kinship toward rejection of "father and son blame good", which is with his benevolence and justice concept. It conflicts with the thought of "four virtues" of benevolence, righteousness, propriety and wisdom as human beings.
【作者單位】： 山東社會(huì)科學(xué)院文化研究所;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“中西倫理學(xué)比較視域中的儒家責(zé)任倫理思想研究”(14BZX046)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B222.5
，
本文編號(hào)：2388600
[Abstract]:Around Mencius' theory of responsibility and goodness, scholars of later generations have not only defense, inheritance, innovation and development, but also criticism and criticism. As the theory of dealing with the special interpersonal relationship between father and son, Mencius' theory of responsibility and goodness has caused a long and widespread controversy and refutation since ancient times, which faces three kinds of reasonable challenges: first, the reasonable challenge of the dimension of self-other relationship. Mencius said that "the ancient man changed and taught" does not necessarily cause the deterioration of bilateral relations as he feared; Second, the rationality challenge of blood kinship ethics, Mencius' idea of "not being responsible for kindness between father and son" and the concept of remonstrating kinship advocated by Confucianism are difficult to get in harmony, which leads to the difficulty of unifying blood kinship and moral rationality, and the unity of kinship ethics and social ethics. Third, Mencius'"responsibility between father and son" concept is worried about direct remonstrance, justice and harsh words will damage the father and son love and kinship toward rejection of "father and son blame good", which is with his benevolence and justice concept. It conflicts with the thought of "four virtues" of benevolence, righteousness, propriety and wisdom as human beings.
【作者單位】： 山東社會(huì)科學(xué)院文化研究所;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“中西倫理學(xué)比較視域中的儒家責(zé)任倫理思想研究”(14BZX046)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B222.5
，
本文編號(hào)：2388600
本文鏈接：http://www.sikaile.net/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2388600.html
教材專(zhuān)著
