【摘要】：現(xiàn)象學(xué)的創(chuàng)始人胡塞爾與哲學(xué)人類學(xué)的創(chuàng)始人普萊斯納之間有一段不太長的師生關(guān)系。由于普萊斯納在他學(xué)習(xí)的一開始就已經(jīng)具備了自己的思想體系,因而對(duì)胡塞爾的現(xiàn)象學(xué)持有懷疑與批判的態(tài)度。胡塞爾對(duì)普萊斯納的首要影響在于撇開所有理論,面向?qū)嵤碌囊?其次在于意識(shí)的意向性和先天本質(zhì)方面的主張。此外,胡塞爾的哥廷根講座"自然與精神"也對(duì)普萊斯納哲學(xué)人類學(xué)思想的形成有啟示作用。盡管哲學(xué)人類學(xué)曾受到胡塞爾和海德格爾的批評(píng),從現(xiàn)象學(xué)到哲學(xué)人類學(xué)的發(fā)展也仍是《邏輯研究》發(fā)表以來胡塞爾現(xiàn)象學(xué)及隨之形成的現(xiàn)象學(xué)運(yùn)動(dòng)的兩個(gè)主要展開方向之一。這個(gè)方向帶有舍勒、普萊斯納的思想蹤跡;另一個(gè)方向則帶有海德格爾、伽達(dá)默爾的思想蹤跡,即從現(xiàn)象學(xué)到解釋學(xué)的發(fā)展方向。
[Abstract]:The relationship between the founder of phenomenology, Husserl, and the founder of philosophical anthropology, Plessner, is not long. As Plesner had his own ideological system at the beginning of his study, he held a skeptical and critical attitude towards Husserl's phenomenology. Husserl's primary influence on Plessner lies in putting aside all theories and facing the requirements of reality, followed by the intentionality of consciousness and the proposition of innate essence. In addition, Husserl Gottingen's lecture Nature and Spirit also enlightens the formation of Plessner's philosophical anthropology. Although philosophical anthropology has been criticized by Husserl and Heidegger, the development from phenomenology to philosophical anthropology is still one of the two main directions of Husserl's phenomenology and the accompanying phenomenological movement. In this direction, there is a trace of Scheler, Plessner's thoughts; in the other direction, there is a trace of Heidegger's, Gadamer's thought, that is, the direction of development from phenomenology to hermeneutics.
【作者單位】： 中山大學(xué)哲學(xué)系 中山大學(xué)現(xiàn)象學(xué)研究所;
【基金】：國家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重大項(xiàng)目“《胡塞爾文集》中譯”(12&ZD124),項(xiàng)目負(fù)責(zé)人:倪梁康
【分類號(hào)】：B516.5
，

本文編號(hào)：2141874