本文選題：朱子詩經(jīng)學 + 文王之化��； 參考：《現(xiàn)代哲學》2017年01期

【摘要】：朱子以文王之化解說“二南”,又以淫詩說審視“鄭衛(wèi)之風”,其背后均通向圣人之學。具體而言,朱子通過“生有圣德”、后人追述稱王、以“理”解“天”回應文王受命說等方式,在其詩經(jīng)學體系中塑造了文王的圣人形象,并作為學之典范,且認為文王之化使“二南”之人均得性情之正。相較之下,未被文王之化的“鄭衛(wèi)”,舊俗未革,故多淫詩。朱子分別從作者定位、“止乎禮義”之義及雅鄭邪正之辨等方面審視淫詩于學者之影響,其批駁之旨乃為使讀者保持對淫詩的警省,從而得以端正性情,并通向圣人之學。
[Abstract]:Zhu Zi's theory of "Ernan" and the "wind of Zheng Wei" are all leading to the study of saints. In particular, Zhu Zi created the image of King Wen as a saint in his poetic study system by means of "living with holy virtue", tracing back to the king as king, and responding to the theory of king Wen's order by "reason" and "heaven", and as a model of learning. And think that the Wen King of the "two South" of the human temperament of the right. By contrast, the "Zheng Wei", which has not been transformed by the King of Wen, has not changed the old customs, so it has more poetries. Zhu Zi examines the influence of poetical poems on scholars from the aspects of the author's position, the meaning of "stop the courtesy and righteousness" and the differentiation of Ya-Zheng 's evil spirits. The purpose of his criticism is to make the readers keep the police province of the poetical poems, so as to correct their temperament and lead to the study of saints.
【作者單位】： 中山大學哲學系;
【分類號】：B244.7

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)會議論文 前10條

1 朱茹辛;;從文化觀點探索朱子學術(shù)思想的影響[A];海峽兩岸論朱熹——紀念朱熹誕辰865周年暨朱熹對中國文化貢獻學術(shù)會議論文集[C];1995年

2 楊少涵;;朱子的心性之學及其理論問題簡論[A];朱子學與文化建設學術(shù)研討會論文集[C];2012年

3 朱杰人;;《朱子家禮》解讀——以婚禮為例[A];歷史文獻研究（總第30輯）[C];2011年

4 吳展良;;朱子的世界秩序觀之構(gòu)成方式:朱子的天人關(guān)系思想析論[A];北京論壇（2005）文明的和諧與共同繁榮——全球化視野中亞洲的機遇與發(fā)展：“歷史變化：實際的、被表現(xiàn)的和想象的”歷史分論壇論文或摘要集（續(xù)）[C];2005年

5 朱榮貴;;從李方子《文公年譜》遺文和《朱子事實》看朱門學術(shù)之歧異[A];海峽兩岸論朱熹——紀念朱熹誕辰865周年暨朱熹對中國文化貢獻學術(shù)會議論文集[C];1995年

6 iJ孴;;朱子門人正誤二則——兼論《朱子語類》對門人研究的價值[A];傳統(tǒng)中國研究集刊（第十一輯）[C];2013年

7 河Y煤，

本文編號：1849178